It's hard to make constructive comments on something unfinished; notwithstanding here are my opinions:
I am a 'meat and potatoes' person and, for me, the 8 identical (except for size) images of daisies placed throughout the profile is a little too much although I appreciate they represent the daisies collected for the funeral by the "little Italian children".
I think it is great that you have tracked down so many different articles and records but I would lke to see at least a short synopsis (particualrly of the longer articles) to capture my interest and make me want to open them and read them. Also indicating the source of each article would be good. The first article [The Clark Profile Images-393.jpg] has a wonderful image that would look good displayed right in the profile and would capture interest (who are all those children in the picture? I should read the profile/article to find out)
I would like to see the sources 'reduced', by which I mean choose the 'strongest' source for each version of a fact. Any sources that end up not being used can be listed as 'see also'. For example if I have a published genealogy, a birth record, and an obituary and none contradict the others, I would cite the birth record for name, birth date/place, and parents, the published genealogy for marriage date/place, and the the obituary for death and burial date/place, as well as any children's names. There is little reason to have 4 sources for a name.
Once again - these are just my opinions