Please would an arborist help merge Rachel McMunn?

+3 votes
233 views
It is stated that there are three of them, McMunn-47, 48 and 61 all of whom belong to the same father and different mothers. I have my doubts.
WikiTree profile: Rachel McMunn
in Genealogy Help by William Arbuthnot of Kittybrewster G2G6 Pilot (183k points)
edited by William Arbuthnot of Kittybrewster

 This note from:Peter D http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Beattie-247#WT-comments

question about the 'McMunn's. Did any of yours live in Co Sligo Ireland mid-1800s. There was a Doctor McMunn there who married a Beatty. Regards Peter D Beattie (UK). 

Maybe check with him?

Do you have an address?
His Wiki Tree ID is Beattie-247, if that is what you meant.  Otherwise, no.

3 Answers

+2 votes
 
Best answer

Looking at the three profile sI would guess there have been mistakes made for two or three of the mothers. As Mary said make them unmerged matches, and contact the PM to discuss the matter, the PM is active, only last week she added you to a trusted list for one of her profiles. As she uploaded all three she is the one who may know most of where the information came from.

As all three contain no sources except for Ancestry Family Trees references, which is totally unreliable, I would say there is no evidence for any mother, but perhaps the PM knows more and has not added it yet.

by Living Geleick G2G6 Pilot (224k points)
selected by Michelle Hartley
0 votes
Sir William,

instead of using a merge, match them instead until changes are made for the mother in question.  It could be spelling, dates and different first names.  Once the profile managers are notified, let them handle the differences and work it out between them.
by Living Hammond G2G6 Mach 8 (84.9k points)
They are both "managed" by the Canterville ghost!
Ha ha!
Ditto!
ROFL!   Ok, Sir William, you got me there.    I would request an open profile on both pages if run by the same manager then, and adopt the profiles once they are available, make the changes and put them back as orphans until family adopts them.
Unfortuneatly there are three profiles and three mothers, they cannot be merged until the the mothers are sorted out. The profiles cannot be orphaned as the manager of all three is an active member, just not here every day like some of us. If she does not know which is the mother I would suggest removing them all as mother and leaving a note in the profiles that they may have been Rachels mother, also noting as Tom said one may have been 10 years old when Rachel was born.
+4 votes
Martha Hamilton seems to have been ten years old when Rachel was born.  If this can be documented, it would eliminate her as a possible mother.
by Tom Bredehoft G2G6 Pilot (209k points)

Related questions

+3 votes
1 answer
+8 votes
5 answers
330 views asked Jan 23, 2017 in Policy and Style by Brad Foley G2G6 Mach 7 (78.4k points)
+5 votes
1 answer
104 views asked Jun 25, 2016 in Genealogy Help by Debi Hoag G2G6 Pilot (395k points)
+11 votes
2 answers
+11 votes
3 answers
178 views asked Aug 25, 2016 in WikiTree Tech by Kitty Linch G2G6 Mach 4 (43.4k points)
+7 votes
1 answer
+3 votes
1 answer
+3 votes
1 answer

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...