Adding images from webpages

+3 votes
414 views
There are tons of image resources on the web now that we can use for our profiles. I haven't found a way yet to retain the original image link and not have to download the image to my computer and then re-upload it to WikiTree.  Is that possible, or do I need to link to the original image through my comments on the image?

For example, for my famous ancestor Roger Sherman, there are a number of great images online, like these:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0a/RogerShermanPortrait.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/54/Roger_Sherman_1721-1793_by_Ralph_Earl.jpeg/220px-Roger_Sherman_1721-1793_by_Ralph_Earl.jpeg

http://www.sonofthesouth.net/revolutionary-war/patriots/roger-sherman.jpg

Thoughts?  Suggestions?
WikiTree profile: Roger Sherman
in Genealogy Help by Kyle Dane G2G6 Pilot (113k points)
edited by Keith Hathaway

1 Answer

+4 votes

Hi Kyle,

If I understand what you are asking - you would like to specify just a link and have the image stored at some other site displayed on a Wikitree page. The equivalent to using html <img src="http://www.example.com/picture.jpg">

My opinion based on this interpretation of what you are asking is:

1) It is not 'ideal' to just display another site's content, even if the material is public domain. a) There is the issue of broken links if content is moved or renamed - perhaps less of a concern with a site like Wikimedia, but if you allow links they can be made to all websites. b) There is the issue of bandwidth usage for the other sites. c) It is also unfair if the site hosting the content and providing the bandwidth displays ads or seeks donations to pay their bills as those ads and sonation requests will not be seen. d) It may or not be legal depending on the specific rules of the country where the linked content is and the external sites terms of service. Some jurisdictions may consider a photo of a painting to be subject to copyright even if the painting itself is not (similar to a derivative work)

2) By having users upload images themselves they have 'greater' personal responsibility to ensure material IS free from copyright. People are more likely to think about the legality and rights when they have to download and upload content themselves.

3) Privacy - when a users computer 'pulls' content from a third-party site their personal information may be collected and used subject to that other sites privacy policy without the user being aware of - and agreeing to - that usage. That policy may or may not be the same as Wikitree's.

 

by Rob Ton G2G6 Pilot (291k points)
Let me ask the hypothetical this way: what if you were able to bring the image/link over to WikiTree the same way Pinterest does?  My understanding is that when you view an image on Pinterest, you are not visiting the original site - the image is duplicated "on Pinterest", but the image retains a link to the original site which you will go to if you click on the image.

I'm pretty sure this doesn't solve your copyright objection and that alone is probably reason enough for WikiTree not to follow Pinterest's lead.  I'm just thinking out loud and looking for every way I can to improve my profiles.
The html code doesn't seem to work.

Related questions

+4 votes
1 answer
1.3k views asked Jan 5, 2014 in WikiTree Tech by Dianne Reuby G2G1 (1.8k points)
+6 votes
2 answers
810 views asked Nov 19, 2017 in WikiTree Help by Kyla H G2G6 Mach 5 (54.5k points)
+11 votes
3 answers
170 views asked Nov 20, 2018 in The Tree House by Living Rocca G2G6 Mach 5 (59.6k points)
+9 votes
1 answer
+7 votes
2 answers
206 views asked Apr 5, 2017 in The Tree House by Carolyn Mills G2G Crew (340 points)
+5 votes
3 answers
219 views asked Jan 15, 2017 in Policy and Style by Douglas Beezley G2G6 Mach 3 (36.1k points)
+6 votes
2 answers
+12 votes
1 answer

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...