Orphans Again

+5 votes
101 views

By way of explanation --  I decided to take a break (and gain a little experience on Wiki at the same time).  I select an Orphaned Surname Group I know “something about.”  Find missing dates and add DateGuess and any other sources/info I can come up with.  Although I have to admit, I sometimes get side-tracked and start wandering down the Yellow Brick Road (Duplicates) – Hopefully, I will find Oz one of these days.

I have a quirky situation with two profiles – both orphans – both no information other than name – Looks like “no connections” and may have been the user profiles originally.  The only clue is the name of the GEDCOM Pioneer Stock.GED

Would like someone to verify my thought process to see if I make sense or if I should go another direction.  Procedurally, it seems to make sense, but don’t have enough Wiki experience to see a potential problem in the making.

1.         They serve no logical use

2.         They should be merged away – but there does not seem to be anywhere to merge them

3.         Adopt Both – merge them together – Now I have 1 (does not seem to be a reason why they should be adopted unless there is a 30-day wait?)

4.         Remaining 1  could be:

a.         used as an additional Burnside entry by just changing the name and adding information; or see if

b.         an “Unknown with the same problems” exist elsewhere under the same (Burnside) surname; or

c.         create it as an Unknown profile – then merge all (surname specific) garbage found into the one profile (with Garbage Notation).  But then once you have worked the surname, what do you do with the Unk?;  revert to step“a”???

It would seem that at least this would keep the original information as trackable under changes?

 

 

WikiTree profile: John Burnside
in Policy and Style by Sandy Edwards G2G6 Mach 7 (78.5k points)
Hi Sandy Edwards. Thank you.

I looked at Penny ... is there a second ID?

Updated: Might it be Tami? Burnside-47?
Hi again and thank you again, Sandy Edwards,  

Assuming this is Tami and Penny, I would merge away or change the given names/identity, but have some additional logic that will send you in a private message.

Good work!
I will check and see what I can add and use your info.  It was Tami & Penny I was referring to.  I will take a look at the James and send a private message to see if they want to adopt the other two.  I think this probably finishes off the dates here - now I can address any dupllicates that I find.
 
Many thanks.
Regards, Sandy

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

+3 votes
3 answers
229 views asked Apr 22, 2020 in Policy and Style by Karen Lowe G2G6 Pilot (192k points)
+5 votes
0 answers
65 views asked Feb 15 in WikiTree Help by M Gillies G2G6 Mach 4 (44.1k points)
+1 vote
1 answer
+1 vote
1 answer
270 views asked Jul 26, 2022 in Genealogy Help by Ken Spratlin G2G6 Mach 2 (20.1k points)
+2 votes
0 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...