Contents |
William d'Aubeney [1]
Son and heir of William d'Aubeney and Alice (etc) of Louvain, (widow of Henry I, King of England)[1]
He was, however, styled Earl of Arundel before he received possession of the Castle and Honour, namely, on 18 September 1189, and on 26 November of the same year he witnessed King Richard's Charter as "Will. Earl of Arundel."
He received also at the same time, the third penny of the pleas of Sussex in the precise words of the grant made to his father. In 1191 he was made Custos of Windsor Castle, and in 1194 one of the Receivers of the money raised for the King's ransom.
He married before Michaelmas 1176 Maud de Saint Hilary, widow of Roger de Clare (otherwise Roger Fitz Richard), 2nd Earl of Hertford. [1]
Maud was the daughter and heir of James de St.. Hilaire du Harcouet and Aveline, who had 4 sons and 3 daughters. The four sons included William, eldest, and the daughters included Avice and Maud.
In 1176/7 he was confirmed as Earl of Sussex, but the castle and Honour of Arundel were, in accordance with the policy of King Henry II, retained by the Crown. [1]
William d'Aubeney, b: 1138, was named "Earl of Sussex" in 1176/77, and in 1790, he became the 2nd Earl of Arundel on the death of his father, William d'Aubeney Sr. As it was considered the superior title, "Earl of Sussex" fell into disuse.[2]
He was granted restoration of the Castle and Honour of Arundel by King Richarfd I, 27 June 1190 when he became Earl of Arundel. [1]
He died 24 Dec 1193, and was buried at Wymondham Priory, Norfolk.[1][3]
William and his wife Maud had three sons and one daughter:[1]
An additional daughter Avice is sometimes shown as a daughter of William and Maud, but not by Douglas Richardson.[1]
See also:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: William is 21 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 27 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 22 degrees from George Catlin, 23 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 31 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 23 degrees from George Grinnell, 26 degrees from Anton Kröller, 20 degrees from Stephen Mather, 28 degrees from Kara McKean, 26 degrees from John Muir, 20 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 32 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
A > Aubigny | D > d'Aubeney > William (Aubigny) d'Aubeney
Categories: This Day In History December 24 | Earls of Arundel | Early Barony of Arundel | Early Barony of Old Buckenham
I also notice that the Regesta regum anglo-normannorum, 1066-1154, vol. 2 refers to her in the index as Alice of Louvain https://archive.org/details/regestaregumangl02grea/page/415/mode/1up
Even if we were to use a "proper family name", deciding what that is can be difficult. All primary sources in this period are in Latin, and there is no definite way of spelling most names. I've come across documents where the same person might be referred to several times in the same document but their name is spelled differently
edited by John Atkinson
This inconsistency cascades into the children of this profile.
In general, this strikes me as NOT a case where we ought to "use their conventions not ours" because any historical records we may be deferring to as definitive source docs for name spelling, are misspelling a French name phonetically in English, ie omitting the silent G. This is not the same thing as converting Guillaume to William, for example; it would be like misspelling Guillaume as Geeyohm.
In this regard, a similar example is the (interrelated) Tosny/Tonei family, descended from Hugues de Calvacamp, which experienced similar name-misspelling in England (but not in France).
By promoting the quasi-anglo variants of these ancient Franco-Norman names, I feel we are making the mistake of being anglocentric, and perhaps unintentionally deferring to primary source records from England in an era when they famously lacked authoritative spelling.
In contrast, this is NOT the same dynamic as say the French placename St-Liz becoming the British surname Senlis, and sticking as such over time. Perhaps would be more like western sources misspelling say Osama bin Laden as Binladen, merely because that's how western surnames typically look. And we shouldn't do that here on Wikitree, right?
If the profile managers agree, can they resolve the inconsistency of the surnames in this chunk of this family, and standardize on dAubigny? If not, for whatever reason (i.e. if this is intentional) can they explain why in the profile(s)?
Cheers