no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Unknown (Unknown) Wood (bef. 1605 - abt. 1643)

Unknown Wood formerly [surname unknown]
Born before [location unknown]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married before 1618 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about after about age 38 in Maspeth, Queens, New York, British Colonial Americamap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Puritan Great Migration Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Apr 2010
This page has been accessed 788 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Unknown (Unknown) Wood migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Disputed Person

There was a Margaret Carter married 28 January 1610/11 at Southwark, St Saviours, Surrey, England to John Wood.[1] However, the recently digitized Token Books of St. Savior's Parish suggest that John Wood, spouse of Margaret Wood, may still have been living in St. Savior's parish until as late as 1643, when John Wood of Portsmouth was documented as in Newport. This new evidence casts doubt on the claim that this is the Rhode Island couple.[2] Therefore, the name of first wife of John Wood "the mariner" remains unknown.

Biography

Identity

According to Austin's Genealogical Dictionary, the first wife of John Wood "the mariner" was _____ ______ ie Unknown.[3]

Birth

The date of birth remains unknown, so it would be similar to the date of John Wood's birth in 1587. The estimated date of her birth would be in the range of 1580 to 1590. However, considering her marriage to John Wood "the mariner" past the legal age of 18 before their first child born about 1615, it would lead to 1597 or before. Another consideration of their last child's birth about 1635 before her advanced maternal age of 40 that would put the date of her birth in 1595 or after.

Death

Unknown but it has been suggested that she was killed during the Maspeth Massacre.[4]

DNA

A triangulated group has been discovered through autosomal testing that shares John Wood and his wife Unknown (Unknown) Wood as most-recent common ancestors. They share a 10.9 cM segment on chromosome 10.

Sources

  1. London, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812.
  2. Wood, Michael M. "The Token Books of St. Savior's, A Source for testing a John Wood Hypothesis." American Ancestor's Magazine. Vol 19, number 2 (Summer 1028)
  3. Austin, John Osborne. Genealogical Dictionary of Rhode Island: Comprising Three Generations of Settlers Who Came Before 1690 : With Many Families Carried to the Fourth Generation. (Albany: J. Munsell Sons, 1887) p. 230
  4. Clark, Bertha W, and Dorothy W. Ewers. John Wood of Rhode Island: And His Early Descendants on the Mainland. United States: B.W. Clark, 1966, p. 2, 6, and 11. Download at FamilySearch
See also:

Contributors

Ron Callahan, Jonathon Dale Walter Myers, Mike Wood, Bob Nichol, Beryl Meehan





Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Unknown's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Carter-7479 and Unknown-440245 appear to represent the same person because: Here's another Margaret.
posted by Beryl Meehan
Unknown-440245 and Carter-7479 are not ready to be merged because: Unless I have missed something, according to the comment here and intro to the profile of Unknown-440245, Margaret has previously been severed as John's wife. If someone is able to confirm this, then perhaps the match can be rejected.--Gene
posted by GeneJ X
The article by Wood does not speak with the same degree of certainty as seems represented here. Wood (the author) does not seem sure he has even clearly identified the same Margaret Carter. I don’t see where it says Margaret was living in 1643. (John’s profile mentions the date 1634). Perhaps it could say that John Wood probable husband of Margaret Carter took communion with Robert Carter in 1643.
posted by M Smith
Thank you, I agree the claims in Wood's 2017 article do appear more cautious. I have revised the text to more closely conform to the conclusions of the article. However, the article is a bit confusing but as I read it, Wood concludes on p. 45 that there are references to John Wood of Frying Pan Alley in the token books until as late as "1643" - which is the basis for that statement in this profile. It appears the reference in the spouse profile to 1634 was a typo. If you think I am misreading that, please correct me.
posted by Scott McClain
It looks looks perfect to me (I might have added that he took communion with Robert Carter, except I can't find anything to connect a Robert to the other Carter's). Having had the chance to look at the article and the records more closely, the article is indeed confusing. It has John Carter buying a token after he is dead (another John Carter, possibly the son, has a later burial record at St Savior's.) Also, it can be incorrectly interpreted that the token book says the older John was buried at St Savior's (I found the burial record). Despite the confusion, my conclusion is that the article is more conclusive than it may appear. By the way, it looks like some rudimentary work for this Carter family was done on FamilySearch: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GX64-6HW
posted by M Smith
Instead of merging this profile with Carter-9289. I think it would be more efficient to change her to Unknown Unknown which is what Austin (Gen Dict) calls the first wife of John Wood, than making all the diconnections. Objections?
posted by Anne B
Carter-9289 and Carter-66 do not represent the same person because: changing Carter-66 to unknown makes sense
posted by Anne B
Carter-9289 and Carter-66 appear to represent the same person because: Definitely the same person. Please see the bio on Carter-9289. Newly digitzed records prove she was not the wife of the immigrant John Wood. She will need to be disconnected from husband and death date changed.
posted by Anne B
The Margaret Carter who married 28 Jan 1611 in St Saviours, Southwark did NOT die about 1643 in Maspeth, Queens.

Please see the NEHGS "American Ancestors" magazine, Summer 2018, for information which has been substantiated with SOURCE RECORDS.

posted by Mike Wood
Mike, did you read my merge proposal? It acknowledges the challenge-- but she's married to the same man. Perhaps unmerged match until we sort it out?
posted by Jillaine Smith
Carter-9289 and Carter-66 do not represent the same person because: sorry, she can not be born 1616 and have a son born 1620...
posted by Mike Wood
Carter-9289 and Carter-66 appear to represent the same person because: There might be a problem with Carter-66: note the two different John Wood spouses on her profile. This might be better as an unmerged match, but I wanted to make sure this note gets posted.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Fixed formatting in marriage location with John Hewson Wood
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Carter-66 and Carter-6928 do not represent the same person because: Her maiden name was not WOOD.
posted by Mike Wood
Carter-66 and Carter-6928 appear to represent the same person because: Her son William looks identical also
posted by H Husted

[Do you know Unknown's family name?]  |  W  >  Wood  >  Unknown (Unknown) Wood

Categories: Puritan Great Migration