no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Nicholas (Radcliffe) de Radcliffe (abt. 1105 - aft. 1122)

Nicholas de Radcliffe formerly Radcliffe aka de Tailbois, Taillebois
Born about in Radcliffe, Lancashire, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Father of
Died after after about age 17 in Bury, Lancashire, Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Maryann Hurt private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 6 May 2013
This page has been accessed 3,850 times.

Contents

Biography

Nicholas has been asserted to be an ancestor of the Talbots who descend from the Norman Conquest. Nicholas de Tailbois was looking to choose a name in the style of an Englishman and chose a surname derived from his Radcliffes estate.[1]

Family

While his wife is unknown, three sons are attributed to him by Hampson (1940):[1]

  • Matthew, married and had a son, Richard, who was gave lands to Burscough Priory in 1124. Richard's son, William, died without heirs. leaving, leaving Henry as the heir of his holdings.[1] Other sources indicate the priory was established in 1190.[2]
  • Henry[1]
  • Simon[1]

Research Notes

Some old books, including Hampson (1940), start the Ratcliffe (Lancashire) family tree with a Nicholas who is said to be a brother of William de Lancaster, also known as William Fitz Gilbert. Examples:

  • James Butterworth (1823) [3]
  • John Debrett (1819)[4]

So it can be seen that Debrett thinks Nicholas might be the same as Henry Radcliffe, previously listed as the son of Nicholas. They key point is that all these sources are trying to find ancestors for William de Radcliffe who is the first really clearly known person the tree.

Here is what a modern and respected source says about the origins of the family:

"The parentage of William de Radcliffe is not known. One Henry de Radcliffe attested a charter in 1189; Farrer, Lancs. Pipe R. 350. Alexander son of Uvieth received 2 oxgangs in Little Lever from Albert Grelley the younger (1162 to 1180), and as Adam de Radcliffe was in possession in 1227, it is possible that Alexander was the father of William; Lancs. Inq. and Extents, i, 57, 130. It will be seen that an Adam son of Alexander occurs in 1246. William de Radcliffe and Hugh his son attested a Withington charter about 1200; Hulme D. no. 1."[5]

So the father of William is currently unknown. Henry is a possible name, because someone of that name appears in an early charter, but so is Alexander.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Charles P. Hampson, "The Book of the Radclyffes", (Edinburgh: Priv. print. by T. and A. Constable at the University Press, 1940), p 2-4, https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/22070/dvm_GenMono005252-00013-1?backurl=&ssrc=&backlabel=Return#?imageId=dvm_GenMono005252-00014-1
  2. "Burscough Priory", WIkipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burscough_Priory
  3. https://books.google.be/books?id=6c0HAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA1-PA51
  4. https://books.google.be/books?id=FPFRAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA1236
  5. 'The parish of Radcliffe', in A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 5, ed. William Farrer and J Brownbill (London, 1911), pp. 56-67. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/lancs/vol5/pp56-67 [accessed 3 April 2017].

Acknowledgments





Is Nicholas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Nicholas by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
DeTail-1 and Radcliffe-648 appear to represent the same person because: I think these are ready to be merged now. Radcliffe-648 si now better sourced. The other profile is unsourced. There was only one source Nicholas Radcliffe and the possible de Tail name is explained in the Nicholas Radcliffe biography.
posted on Radcliffe-648 (merged) by Marty (Lenover) Acks
Radcliffe-423 and Radcliffe-648 appear to represent the same person because: One one Nicholas has been documents for this era in Lancashire. Radcliffe-648 is the one with sources.
posted on Radcliffe-648 (merged) by Marty (Lenover) Acks
Can anyone give a reason not to disconnect this profile from its supposed parents?
posted on Radcliffe-648 (merged) by Andrew Lancaster
I think there are doubts about whether this person existed. Debrett's Baronetage seems to assume that Nicholas of Radcliffe mentioned by Radcliffe genealogists is really the same as Henry Radeclive, the earliest recorded Radcliffe.
posted on Radcliffe-648 (merged) by Andrew Lancaster

R  >  Radcliffe  |  D  >  de Radcliffe  >  Nicholas (Radcliffe) de Radcliffe