no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Robert James Foster (abt. 1600 - bef. 1624)

Sir Robert James "Robert, Richard" Foster
Born about in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 24 in Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 25 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 4,714 times.

Contents

Biography

Robert was born in 1587. He passed away before 1624. [1] Dorcas (b. c. 1600) was married to a Mr. Foster, prior to her marriage with Bartholomew Hoskins (of unknown origins but speculation attempts to attach him with the Hoskyns of Harewood in Herefordshire ... not to be confused with Hertfordshire).[2] She had two children with Robert Foster: Robert and Richard.[3]

Warner (1971), states that the husband of Dorcas was a Richard Foster, but he doesn't cite this claim.[4] Based on onomastics, some other researchers thought that Foster's given name is "Robert."[3] But both given names have been refuted:

"information has conclusively shown that ... Richard Foster was transported by his step-father, Bartholomew Hoskins, ancient planter. Bartholomew had married Richard's mother, Mrs. Dorcus Foster, widow of two children, in England. We do not know the first husband of Dorcus Foster Hoskins, but it was not Sir Robert Foster."[5]

His wife's identity is also in question. Some seem to believe she may have been from the Isham family, and have variously called her:

  • Dorcas Ann Isham; or
  • Mira Isham

but for the most part it's speculation since to date, there really is no documentation to prove this.[3]

What is PROVEN is that Foster's son Richard (b. abt. 1619), sailed on the ship "Safety," from London to the New World in August of 1635 at the age of 16.[6][7]

Parents

[citation needed]

The parents listed for this individual are speculative and may not be based on sound genealogical research. Sources to prove or disprove this ancestry are needed. Please contact the Profile Manager or leave information on the bulletin board.

Marriage

m. Dorcas. Issue:

  • 1. Robert
  • 2. Richard (b. abt. 1619; age 16 in Aug 1635).[6]

Sources

  1. Note that the date of birth for Mira Isham (b. 1587) is not valid for this Robert Foster (see Dorcas' profile for sources on Isham's birth). The only dating that we have for his wife Dorcas, puts her date of birth around 1600. Her second husband Bartholomew Hoskins was b. abt. 1600/1.
  2. According to Achievements of Canterbury (n.d.), Dorcas Foster of London and Bartholomew Hoskins, gent. of St. Mary, Bothaw, London, were married by licence in Dustan, Stepney on 03 Jul 1628, (p. 3).
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Achievements of Canterbuy, n.d.
  4. Warner, 1971
  5. "Our Foster/Morgan Ancestors," (2011, 26 July). Rootsweb.[1]
  6. 6.0 6.1 Hotten, 1874, p. 122
  7. Achievements of Canterbury, n.d., p. 1




Is Robert your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Robert by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Let's add Mortimer to his internet list of given names! Just Kidding! Genealogical humor. But seriously. This man absolutely must be detached from Dorcas Foster Hoskins as her husband is unknown. Ancestry family trees with zero sources are not valid per wikitree guidelines.

Cheers.

posted by Chad Olivent
Foster-28578 and Foster-355 appear to represent the same person because: they share the same spouse, Dorcas (Isham) Hoskins, and the same son, James/Richard Foster.
posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Forster-1484 and Foster-355 are not ready to be merged because: Not enough information to be certain
posted by [Living Davison]
Compromise... first name UNKNOWN (marked certain) and preferred name as Robert (marked uncertain).
posted by [Living Ogle]
Forster-1484 and Foster-355 are the same UNKNOWN Foster. ... Merge into FOSTER. There's no proof for Forster of Durham or Surrey. Unproven speculation (based on onamastics) has tried to name him both Richard (in the first place)... and Robert came up some time later...
posted by [Living Ogle]
Do not confuse this person with Foster-2254.
posted by William Foster Jr
Forster-454 and Foster-355 do not represent the same person because: Two different people born in two different eras, to two different fathers
posted by Robin Lee
By 1624 his wife was a widow and remarried, so I have "fixed" the death date. Also, her first husband never left England
posted by Robin Lee
Forster-197 and Foster-1786 appear to represent the same person because: Same person, but don't know correct last name at birth. Family eventually became Foster.
posted by Carole Partridge

F  >  Foster  >  Robert James Foster

Categories: Forster DNA Study | Virginia, Forster Name Study