no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Isaac Fox (1657 - abt. 1735)

Isaac Fox
Born in Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 18 Jul 1678 in Billerica, Middlesex, Massachusetts Baymap
Husband of — married about 1720 in Groton, New London, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 77 in New London, Connecticut Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 18 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 1,540 times.

Biography

Isaac was born in 1657. He was the son of Thomas Fox. He passed away about 1689.

Isaac Fox married Abigail Osborn in Billerica, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay on 18 July 1678.[1]

This profile originally for Isaac Fox born: 1657 with wife Sarah Larrabee had many mistakes. John Fox (brother of Isaac) was born c.1653 and it was he who was married to Sarah Larrabee (my direct ancestors). Isaac Fox born 1657 was married 1st to Abigail Osborn and 2nd to Elizabeth Beebe.

Sources

  1. Middlesex, Vital Records of Billerica Massachusetts to the year 1850, p. 257: "Osban"
  • "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QPZL-8VDX : 31 October 2019), Isaac Fox and Abigail Osburn, 18 May 1678; citing Marriage, Billerica, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007009675.
  • "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FC99-5ZK : 10 November 2020), Isaac Fox in entry for Samuel Fox, 30 Apr 1687; citing Birth, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 004198966.
  • Source: S99 Type: Web Site Title: Ancestry.com URL: www.ancestry.com Data Changed: Date: 4 AUG 2012
  • Source: "Descendants of Thomas Fox of Concord, Mass. (through his Sixth Son) Isaac Fox of Medford, Mass. & (New Caanan?), Ct. (Five Generations)" by George Henry Fox, M.D. 145 East 54th St. New York, N.Y. (pub. 1931). Information in this genealogy gives both New Caanan & New London but New Caanan might be a typo. Mr. Fox was up in years when he prepared his genealogy and passed away in 1937. He was buried in the Ballston Spa Village Cemetery in Ballston Spa, Saratoga County, New York where his father & mother were also buried.
  • Paternal relationship is confirmed through Y-chromosome DNA testing on Family Tree DNA. FSF and half his 8th cousin 1x removed, Kent Fox, FTDNA kit # 69617, match at a Genetic Distance of 1 on 37 markers, thereby confirming their direct paternal lines back to their most-recent common ancestor who is Thomas Fox, the 8x great grandfather of FSF and 7x great grandfather of Kent Fox.

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile Fox-1392 created through the import of Putnam2-1_2010-01-02_2011-02-16_2011-10-11.ged on Oct 12, 2011 by John Putnam. See the Changes page for the details of edits by John and others.
  • FAMILY TREE




Is Isaac your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Isaac by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Isaac:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Fox-10560 and Fox-309 are not ready to be merged because: Death date difference.
posted by Deanna Speed
It looks like these profiles (Thomas, Hannah, Isaac) have been duplicated many times. I wonder if they would be eligible for PPP under a Project? Something to do with early colonists maybe? (just throwing out ideas!)
Fox-10531 and Fox-309 are not ready to be merged because: Place of birth for Thomas Fox. Hannah Brooks Wiley is correct spouse of thomas,but her birth and death uncertain. She definitely had 3 spouses. I found marriage names and dates for each.
posted by Deanna Speed
Fox-10531 and Fox-309 appear to represent the same person because: same birth and death dates, same wife
Jolone, Isaac Fox's mother was Hannah Brooks Fox. Isaac only married Abigail Osborne according to the book Descendants of Thomas Fox of Concord by Dr. George Henry Fox pub. 1926-1931. Where did you get your erroneous information from?
posted by William Fox Jr.
Fox-6227 and Fox-309 appear to represent the same person because: They are indeed the same Isaac Fox, son of Thomas & Hannah (Brooks) Fox. The differences are in the birth date but same year. The mother is listed as Hannah (Brooks) Willey. Widow Hannah married second to Mr. Lester then third to Isaac Willey so no problem there.
posted by William Fox Jr.
Fox-4944 and Fox-309 appear to represent the same person because: These two profiles represent the same Isaac Fox, son of Thomas & Hannah (Brooks) Fox.
posted by William Fox Jr.

F  >  Fox  >  Isaac Fox