Robert Keith, was born 1483, the second son of William Keith, 2nd Earl of Marischal[1] and Lady Elizabeth Gordon. [2][3]
Robert Keith was styled as "Lord Keith, Master of Marischal." Robert never became the 3rd Earl of Marischal because he died before his father, and that title went to his son, William.[4]
Before January 8 1505. Lord Keith married Lady Elizabeth Douglas, daughter of John Douglas, 2nd Earl of Morton and Janet Crichton.[4][3][5] They had issue:
Beatrice, m. Alexander Fraser, s. h. of Alexander, 7th of Philorth.[3]
William, 3rd Earl Marischal, born 1506, died October 7, 1581[2][3]
Lord Keith was involved in the Battle at Flodden field on 9 September 1513. This battle was when King Henry VIII of England's northern army under Thomas Howard, Earl of Surrey, annihilated the invading Scots army near Branxton, Northumberland. Among the more than 10,000 dead was James IV King of Scotland. His infant son would succeed him as James V King of Scotland and the queen, Margaret Tudor, would assume the regency.
Research Notes
The date of Lord Keith's death is highly disputed. While some biographers report that he died in the battle at Flodden Field, in 1513,[2] others, including Sir James Balfour Paul's "Scots Peerage"[3] have him still alive after April 5, 1514. Peerage.com notes that he died some time between 24 August 1524 and 22 April 1525, while another source indicates "He was definitely alive on 10/10/1518, when he gave consent to a charter by his father Earl William to his younger brother Gilbert, of the lands of Troupe. See NRS GD57/1/133"
Sources
↑Cokayne, George Edward, "The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom", London: St. Catherine Press, 1910, Ed. 2 Vol I, Archive.org,
p. 117
↑ 2.02.12.22.32.42.52.6Burke, John Bernard, "A Genealogical History of the Dormant, Abeyant, Forfeited, and Extinct Peerages of the British Empire", London: Harrison,1866, Archive.org,
p. 303
↑ 3.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.8Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909, Vol. VI, Archive.org,
p 43
↑ 4.04.1Cokayne, George Edward, "The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom", London: William Pollard & Co, 1932, Ed. 2 Vol VIII, FamilySearch,
p. 477
↑Burke, John and Burke, John Bernard, "The Royal Families of England, Scotland, and Wales: With Their Descendants, Sovereigns and Subjects", London: E.Churton, 1851, Vol. II, Hathitrust,
p. 208, Pedigree V
↑Cokayne, George Edward, "The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom", London: St. Catherine Press, 1910, Ed. 2 Vol I, Archive.org,
p. 314
↑Cokayne, George Edward, "The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom", London: St. Catherine Press, 1912, Ed. 2 Vol II, Archive.org,
p. 239
↑Cokayne, George Edward, "The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom", London: William Pollard & Co, 1932, Ed. 2 Vol VIII, Archive.org,
p. 258, p. 677
I am trying to find family history and I have a distant cousin that we are trying to find our connections. He sent me a long line of family and at the top was Lord Robert Keith. So, I interested in learning more if anyone has an knowledge.
It seems odd that Robert Keith who died in France in 1551 and is shown in the biography as a son of Robert and whose mother was Lady Douglas and has two sources attached is not shown as their child. He was the father of several illegitimate children including Andrew Keith (Lord Dingwall) and Rev. Alexander Keith. (see http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7480/, page 318)
Is there any reason why he is not shown alongside Robert and Elizabeth’s other children?
Is there any reason why he is not shown alongside Robert and Elizabeth’s other children?
edited by Colin Aumann