Attached to f-a-g "Manuscript of membership application for National Society, Sons of the American Revolution, by Joseph Franklin Orr (member # 69311)" it is too blurred to read at all
Family Finder - Matches - Craig Jackson Family Tree [2]
On Hannah Catherine Lowrance as daughter of John and Mary (Perkins) Lawrence:
Although the Welch Family Bible names David Welch's wife as Hannah, she may not be a Lowrance/Lawrence, as I have as yet found no evidence of such a daughter among the records associated with John Lawrence/Lowrance. Although I found a DNA match with one of John's descendants, this match is much better explained by another, better documented, link I found with Debra & Craig Jackson, with their ancestor Nancy Jane Welch (1792-1850), as daughter of Ephraim Welch Sr. (1773 - 1835) and Sarah Elizabeth (Miller) Welch (1770 - 1835), our common ancestors. The relation of the Jackson family to John Lowrance is much better established. Although I added her as a daughter to this couple, I am removing her as daughter until there is better evidence that she was really their daughter.-- Kent Creamer
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
Perkins-17132 and Perkins-99 appear to represent the same person because: Perhaps one of these Mary Perkins profile was soneone else but it's been "done over" as his wife. The BIRTH details needs to be sourced before the merge.
Perkins-3542 and Perkins-99 do not represent the same person because: Mary Perkins does not have the right birth date. Has no husband or mother, father.
Perkins-1373 and Perkins-99 appear to represent the same person because: Potentially the same person. Can PMs sort out if this should be merged? Thanks!