Her marriage to Thomas Carr, son of Walter and Lartha Carr, is dated in published records as 19th day of the 3rd month, commonly called May 1705, but this may be a transcription error of the original record. The record before this marriage in the Quaker minutes is dated 1705 and the one after it is dated 1709. A marriage year of 1709 makes more sense when you examine the facts of her grandmother and mother's lives.[1]
Her marriage to Thomas Carr, son of Walter and Lartha Carr, in the West River Monthly Meeting Minutes, where they were married, is dated "this twenty-second day of the ninthe month, commonly called November, in the year according to the Inglish account 1705". It is between another marriage in 1705 and and marriage in 1704. However, the records in this book do appear to be in random order.[2]
Elizabeth is left a legacy in her mother's will and her husband, Thomas Carr, was the executor of her mother's estate.[3]
Thomas Carr and Elizabeth his wife were accepted into membership with [Gunpowder] Friends in 1754. [4]
↑ Peden, Henry C. Quaker Records of Southern Maryland: Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Abstracts from the Minutes, 1658-1800. Westminster, Md.: Willow Bend, 2000.
↑ The record is available at Ancestry.com (Image : last accessed 7 Dec 2021). It is misfiled in Ohio > Columbiana > Sandy Spring Monthly Meeting > Marriage 1682-1824 (which is not unusual for Ancestry.com Quaker Records). The Book cover (image 1) states it contains Marriage Records for West River Meeting, Herring Creek Meeting, and Indian Springs Meeting for 1682-1824. The certificates state these meetings were in the Province of Maryland. sharing image
↑ Maryland Colonial Administration Accounts Liber 9/186
↑ Henry C. Peden, Jr., Quaker Records of Northern Maryland (Family Line Publications: Westminster, Md. 1993-1994), Records of the Gunpowder Monthly Meeting, at page 34. Other family information on this site.
Carr, Lois Jeannette (Baltzly) and Carr, Charles Edgar. The Passing Shadows of the Carr Clan, Pioneers of Jefferson, Stark, Tuscarawas, and Wayne Counties, Ohio, Their Ancestors and Descendants, 1658-1976 (privately printed, unknown publisher), 1976. (Quality or Certainty of Data: 2)
The Passing Shadows of the Carr Clan, Vol. II, (unknown publisher, publication date, and author).(Quality or Certainty of Data: 2)
Baltimore Families by Barnes. 1989 HISTORY BARNES ON BALTIMORE COUNTY FAMILIES. BARNES.
Copy of her husband's will: Maryland.Gov - Will of Thomas Carr Note: I used Ctrl F to search for his name and it took me to the place on the document where he is listed. There are not any page numbers to cite.
Harrison, J. Houston. "Settlers by the Long Grey Trail", Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1998. Chapter 23: Around and About the Old Country and Elsewhere, page 500. Available on Ancestry.com (Image : last accessed 7 Dec 2021)
(Secondary Source, Quality or Certainty of Data: 2)
See also:
"Relatives of Nate and Kristine Maas," online tree, rootsweb (rootsweb.com) Note: This source is meant only as a starting point.
WikiTree profile Price-1310 created through the import of Lupton file.ged on Jul 8, 2011 by Kim Ostermyer.
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:
Price-4995 and Price-1310 appear to represent the same person because: Hello, these appear to be duplicate profiles of the same person based on the data in common. If you agree please approve this merge proposal. Thanks a lot
Price-4995 and Price-1310 are not ready to be merged because: I postpone this match because it ties Thomas the immigrant to someone (John Andrew) I have not seen documentation to prove it
Thomas came much later than John Andrew. Or two men John and Andrew proposed to be one as I have seen before on another site
Thomas came much later than John Andrew. Or two men John and Andrew proposed to be one as I have seen before on another site