↑ birth Connecticut: Vital Records (The Barbour Collection), 1630-1870 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.) From original typescripts, Lucius Barnes Barbour Collection, 1928.
Name Ruth SEYMOUR, SEIMER
Birth 1699
Location Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Original Text Ruth, d. Zachariah & Mary, b. Apr. 10, 1699
↑ 2.02.12.22.3 "North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000 for Ruth Seymour" in Richard Seymour of Hartford and Norwalk, Conn , and some of his descendants; via Ancestry.com. North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2016. Ancestry link to digitized image
↑ bp "Connecticut, U.S., Church Record Abstracts, 1630-1920 for Zach Seymour (his child)" in Volume 126 Wethersfield of Connecticut. Church Records Index. Connecticut State Library, Hartford, Connecticut Ancestry link to digitized image
another Ruth Seymore:
RUTH11 SEYMOUR (RUTH10 NORTON, JOHN9, JOHN8, RICHARD7, WILLIAM6, RICHARD5, JOHN4, JOHN3, SIR JOHN2, SIR1 DENORVILLE) was born 10 Nov 1707. She married ELISHA SMITH, son of SIMEON SMITH and HANNAH BLISS. He was born 30 Jun1706 in Hartford and died 1754.
Children of RUTH SEYMOUR and ELISHA SMITH are:
i. URANIA12 SMITH, b. Abt. 1739; m. JOSEPH WILLARD.
ii. ELISHA SMITH, b. Abt. 1740.
iii. RUTH SMITH, b. 1742; m. IRA SEYMOUR, 14 Nov 1772.
iv. MOSES SMITH, b. 21 Dec 1747; m. MABEL SEYMOUR, 31 Dec 1772."
Acknowledgments
Created by: Linda Mac
Record added: May 18, 2010
Find A Grave Memorial# 52533498
Thank you to Kitty Smith for creating WikiTree profile Seymour-1204 through the import of Ashbel Smith.ged on Mar 30, 2013.
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth: