Thomas Sherwood Sr.
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Sherwood Sr. (abt. 1586 - bef. 1655)

Thomas Sherwood Sr.
Born about in Kettlebaston, Suffolk, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1610 in Suffolk, Englandmap [uncertain]
Husband of — married about 1638 in Connecticut Colonymap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 69 in Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 16 Nov 2010
This page has been accessed 19,875 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Thomas Sherwood Sr. migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Great Migration (Series 2), by R. C. Anderson, vol. 6, p. 304)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

THERE ARE MANY ERRORS IN BOTH PUBLISHED WORKS AND ON THE INTERNET. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE CHANGES WITHOUT CONSULTING THE ERROR SECTION AND PROVIDING MODERN SOURCES. Joe Cochoit

Contents

Biography

Name

Name: Thomas Sherwood [1] [2]
of Kettlebaston,[3] co. Suffolk, England and Fairfield, Fairfield Co., Connecticut.
He is not the same man as Thomas Sherwood of Stratford, Connecticut. Care must be taken to distinguish the two men. They both immigrated to New England, moved to within 10 miles of each other in Connecticut, and died within 3 years of each other. However, records easily show they are not identical. There is no known connection between the two men.

Birth

Born: About 1586.
Age 48 on the passenger list of the Francis in April of 1634. [4]

Marriages and Children

Married: 1st - Alice Tiler, daughter of John Tiler and Joan Smith, about 1610. [5] This identification was made and published by Leslie Mahler in The American Genealogist in 2007. The key was the discovery of her mother's will which mentioned "Alice my daughter the weife of Thomas Sherwoode of Kettlebarston." The actual marriage of Thomas Sherwood to Alice Tiler was not found, but is estimated from the birth of their first known child about 1611. She was baptized on 16 November 1585 at Hitcham, co. Suffolk, England; she died by 1638 when Thomas had remarried to his second wife Mary.
Married: 2nd - Mary, maiden name unknown, by 1638. She is not "Mary Fitch." There is also no evidence that she is Mary Onge, as is sometimes said. See error section. She married, as her second husband, John Banks by 4 June 1658.
Children of Thomas Sherwood and Alice Tiler: [1] [2]
Note: parentage confirmed by the will of Thomas Sherwood.
  • Jane Sherwood b. say 1611; First named in her father’s will of 21 July 1655, and therefore presumed to be the eldest. Her younger sister Mary was born in 1613, so Jane is estimated to have been born about 1611. Probably married; no further record.
  • Mary Sherwood, bp. Kettlebaston, Suffolk, 1613 (day and month not recorded); named in father’s will, 21 July 1655, probably married, no further record.
  • Thomasine Sherwood, bp. Kettlebaston 10 April 1615; named in father’s will, 21 July 1655, probably married; perhaps m. William Belden of Wethersfield. However, there is no actual evidence to support this outside of the name Thomasine,
  • Sarah Sherwood, bp. Kettlebaston 26 January 1616/7; named in father’s will, 21 July 1655, probably married; no further record. (Jacobus argued that she did not marry Samuel Beardsley.)
  • Anna Sherwood, bp. Kettlebaston 13 June 1619 (aged 14 on 30 April 1634; named in father’s will, 21 July 1655, probably married; no further record.
  • Rose Sherwood, bp. Kettlebaston 10 December 1620 (aged 11 [sic] on 30 April 1634; m. (1) by about 1641 THOMAS RUMBALL (1635, Saybrook); m. (2) by 1650 Thomas Barlow (‘Phebe Barlowe the daughter of Thomas Barlowe was born the 27 of February 1650' at Fairfield; m. (3) after 1658 Edward Nash.>
  • Rebecca Sherwood, bp. Kettlebaston 13 October 1622 (aged 9 [sic] on 30 April 1634; named in father’s will, 21 July 1655, probably married; no further record.
  • Thomas Sherwood, b. about 1624 (aged 10 on 30 April 1634; m. (1) by about 1650 Sarah Wheeler, daughter of Thomas Wheeler; m. (2) by about 1660 Ann Turney (eldest known child b. about 1660, daughter of Benjamin Turney; m. (3) by 1683 Elizabeth ( ) Cable, widow of John Cable m. (4) soon after 24 June 1695 (marriage contract) Sarah (Hide) Colcy, daughter of Humphrey Hide and widow of Peter Coley.
Children of Thomas Sherwood and his second wife Mary: [1] [2]
  • Stephen Sherwood, b. say 1638; m. (1) by 1661 Rebecca Turney, daughter of Benjamin Turney(1639, Concord); m. (2) by 1688 Hannah (Jackson) Galpin, daughter of HENRY JACKSON (1635, Watertown) and widow of Philip Galpin ; m. (3) by an unknown date Mary (Adams) (Guire) Murvin, daughter of Fdward Adams and widow of Guire and Murvin..
  • Mary Sherwood, b. say 1640; m. Windsor 28 June 1659 Joseph Loomis, son of JOSEPH LOOMIS (1638, Windsor) [Windsor Hist 2:432-33; Dawes-Gatcs 2:567-72 (both these sources have an incorrect surname for the bride)].
  • Ruth Sherwood, b. say 1642; m. Windsor 4 June 1663 Joshua Holcombe, son of THOMAS HOLCOMBE.
  • Matthew Sherwood, b. about 1644 (d. Stratfield 26 October 1715 “in 72 year”; m. (1) by about 1669 Sarah Turney, daughter of Benjamin Turney; m. (2) by about 1672 Mary Unknown.
  • Abigail Sherwood, b say 1649; m. by about 1669 Daniel Lockwood, son of ROBERT LOCKWOOD.
  • Isaac Sherwood, b. say 1651; m. by 1676 Elizabeth Jackson, daughter of John Jackson.
Incorrect disconnected children frequently found in other sources:
  • Margaret Sherwood - Married Elias3 Maverick on 8 December 1669 in Charlestown, Massachusetts. Respected secondary sources have made her a daughter Thomas Sherwood and Alice Tiler. As pointed out and discussed in detail in an article in The American Genealogist in 2005, this is certainly incorrect. [2]
  • Anna/Hanna (Barrett) Coe - The wife of John1 Coe is frequently claimed to be Anna/Hannah Sherwood, daughter of Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield. This is incorrect. She has been shown to be actually Hannah (Barrett) (Jenner) Coe.[6] She has been disconnected from her Sherwood parents.
  • Rebecca Unknown - Rebecca, the wife successively of Robert Rose and Henry Allen was previously connected as a daughter of Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield. All trusted secondary sources call her Rebecca Unknown. Extensive research has failed to find any evidence that she was the identical with the Rebecca Sherwood born in 1622. She has been disconnected, until proof is found as to her identity.
  • Jane Sherwood - A number of secondary sources state that Thomas Merritt married "Jane, daughter of Thomas Sherwood of Stratford and his wife Alice Seabrook." This is a very confused statement. Thomas of Stratford married Sarah Seabrook, not Alice. Furthermore, he did not have a daughter Jane. If it was meant that she should be Jane daughter of Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield by his first wife Alice, Jane would have been way to old to have married Thomas Merritt (b. 1634). She has been disconnected from Thomas of Fairfield.
  • Margery Sherwood - Previously connected as a daughter of this Thomas. However, he did not have a daughter Margery. She is certainly meant to be a granddaughter - daughter of his son Thomas who signed a deed of conveyance in 1709. [7] She has been connected as a daughter of Thomas Sherwood jr.

Death and Will

Died: Between 21 July 1655 and 7 September 1655,
Dates will made and inventory taken. [2]
Burial: He is presumed to have been buried at the Old Burying Ground, Fairfield, though this is not known with certainty. The Sherwood Kindred of America has constructed a monument there.[8]
Will: The original will of Thomas Sherwood does not survive, and a recorded copy is in very bad condition. [2][9] This is important because published abstracts differ in at least one key point regarding a daughter Mary/Marg. See error section. The most complete transcription was published in 1929 when the original still existed and was apparently in better condition. [10]
WILL OF THOMAS SHERWOOD---1586-1655, New England.
As given in the 1929 transcription. [10]
Imprimis. I give & bequeath unto the children of my first wife: I bequeath to my son Thomas five acres of upland lying upon the north end of Sasqua Neck.
I bequeath to my daughter Jane twenty shillings.
I bequeath to my daughter Tamsen twenty shillings.
I bequeath to my daughter Mary twenty shillings.
I bequeath to my daughter Sarah twenty shillings.
I bequeath to my daughter Hanna twenty shillings.
I bequeath to my daughter Rose twenty shillings.
I bequeath to my daughter Rebecca forty shillings.
I will that the above named legasies be payd within one year after my decease.
I will & bequeath to my well beloved wife Mary Sherwood whom I make my executor & executrix of this my last will who shall pay the above named legasies. And also the legasies underwritten.
As to my son Steven Sherwood I bequeath my dwelling house & homelot with all the buildings on this homelot & all the lott that layd next to my homelot on which I now live excepting half an acre--etc, etc.
I will & bequeath to my son Matthew all my upland & meadow lying on the other side of Uncawy Creek namly on the east side of the said creek. I will & bequeath to my daughter Mary ten pounds. I will & bequeath to my daughter Ruth ten pounds. I will & bequeath to my daughter Abigail ten pounds. I wil & bequeath to my son Isaac that dwelling house next to my dwelling house that I now live in. And also I give him with the building on that homelot on which it standeth & he is to have the said half acre of land square off from the front the whole widence of the lot & soe downward.
I give & bequeath to my loving & well beloved wife Mary Sherwood all the estate undivided whom I make mine Executor of this my last will Excepting a mare colt which my son Isaac shall have & that to his use & profit presently.
I will that Steven have his portion when he is twenty years of age. And also that Matthew shall have his portion when he is twenty years old. And my son Isaac shall have four acres of meadow in the great meadow which I bought of Peter Merritt & five acres in the new field which he is to have at twenty years of age. To Mary, Abigaill & Ruth which I had by my last wife,---Etc; etc.
And I desire my well beloved friends Thomas Staples & Nathan Gold to be overseers of this my last will. Signed in presence & Witnesses of us this twenty first day of July 1655. Thomas Sherwood
Seal: Giles Smith, John Tomson, Proved October ye 25th. 1655. Fairfield, Connecticut, Probate Records, Liber 1.Folio 109-11.
The Burial Plaque, True and False
In the Old Burial Ground in Fairfield, Connecticut, presumed resting place of the immigrant Thomas Sherwood, is a large stone upon which a plaque has been placed in memory of Thomas Sherwood.
Memorial plaque for Thomas Sherwood
Old Burial Ground in Fairfield
Caution: Contains errors.

In Memory of THOMAS SHERWOOD 1586 - 1655
Puritan - Pioneer - Ancestor
A founder of New England,
A First Settler of Fairfield,
Deputy to the General Court,
Committeeman,
Soldier of the Pequot War,
and His Wives,
Alice Seabrooke,      Mary Fitch,
 1587 - 1639        1619 - 1693
Erected by the Sherwood Kindred of America MCML[11]

Placed over sixty years ago, 1950, it contains some information, derived from the confusion over two Thomases, which recent genealogical researches have proved incorrect. 1586-1655: true enough, he was age 48, when he came on the "Francis" in 1634 and his will and the proving of that will were in 1655. Puritan, Pioneer, Ancestor: definitely a pioneer and an ancestor, but do we know he was a puritan? Founder of New England and first Settler of Fairfield: true. Deputy to the General Court: no, Thomas Sherwood of Stratford held this position, judged by the position of his name next to the other Stratford Deputy in the Connecticut Colony Records.[12] Committeeman: This refers to a committee of men doing preparation work for the Narragansett War in 1654. The colonial record is clear that this was the Stratford Thomas.[12] Was he a soldier in the Pequot War? He was probably living in Wethersfield in 1637, when the town provided 26 men for the militia. He was also 51. There is no actual record of who these men were. Stiles, in his History of Ancient Wethersfield, made a rough list of 20 men. Thomas is not on the list.[13] Alice Seabrook and Mary Fitch have been disproved as wives and are discussed elsewhere in this profile.

Research Notes

Immigration: Thomas Sherwood and his family are recorded on the reconstructed passenger list of the Francis which sailed on the last day of April 1634, arriving at Boston, Massachusetts in June 1634. The list includes Thomas Sherwood aged 48, wife Alice 47, children Anna 14, Rose 11, Thomas 10, and Rebecca 9.[4] The eldest daughters (Jane, Mary, Thomasine and Sarah) are not listed. However, it must be remembered that this is not a true passenger list, but a list of those who had signed a Certificate of Conformity and was collated many months after the Francis had sailed by the church. These lists are often very incomplete, an the other daughters may or may not have also arrived in New England with their parents.
Movement: He arrived with some members of his family on the ship Francis in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1634, and moved to Wethersfield, Connecticut, in the following year. He sold his lands there in 1640 and went to Stamford, Con­necticut, moving again in 1648 to Fairfield, Connecticut, where he remained until his death there in 1655.
Land records: ESTATE: On 26 March 1640, “Thomas Sherwood of Wethersfield ..., carpenter,” sold to “George Wyllys of Hartford ..., gent., ... my house & housing & homelot wherein I the said Tho[mas] Sherwood now dwelL & hold in possession with all other my lots of meadowings, uplands & swamp grounds ... or hereafter to be belonging by reason of any future dividend or dividends according to the proportion of fifteen acres of meadow in large meadow & beaver meadow” in Wethersfield [WetLR 2:35]. “The 4th month [June] & 21th day 1643 the lands of Gorg Willis Esquire lying in Wethersfeild in Connecticut: One piece as it now lyeth together containing thirty-four acres…, viz: a houselot bought of Ed[ward] Wodd containing ten acres & a piece of meadow bought of Thomas Sherwood containing ten acres, also a piece of meadow bought of John Sticklion containing fourteen acres…, one piece whereon a house and barn standeth containing three acres…, one piece in the great meadow containing four acres ..., one piece in the great meadow bought of Thomas Sherwood containing two acres ..., one piece in the great meadow containing four acres…, one piece which was Thomas Sherwood & Thomas Morehowse their houselot with other lands thereunto adjoining in all containing sixteen acres…, one piece bought of Nathaniel Foott containing three acres” [WetLR 1:62). P. 305. [1]
Occupation: Carpenter [WetLR 2:35]. [1]
Education: He signed his deed and his will. His inventory included ‘books” valued at £1 Ss. [Fairfield PR 1:10]. His widow’s inventory included books valued at £1 lOs. [Fairfield PR 4:115]. [1]
Witch trials: His wife Mary Sherwood was friends of Goodwife Knapp. Mary's husband, Thomas, was called as a witness during Goodwife Knapp's witchcraft trial. Knapp was convicted and Thomas accompanied her to the gallows, and after she was hanged, prevented desecration of the body by the mob.
Mary Sherwood is documented as having been personally involved with convicted witch Goodwife Knapp and Great Grandma's Court testimony at a subsequent trial is the only surviving record today in Connecticut's history of that event. Goodwife Knapp is believed to have been the first wife of Roger Knapp, a very early settler of New Haven, Connecticut. As Roger was the only Knapp appearing in Fairfield records at that period, Donald Lines Jacobus in his volumes "Families of Old Fairfield" makes the connection of the two. The witch trial testimony of Mary Sherwood is found in The Witchcraft Delusion - The Story of the Witchcraft Persecutions in Seventeenth-Century New England, Including Original Trial Transcripts" by John M. Taylor, Gramercy Books New York & Avenel, Chapter 10, pp. 122-141, It is actually a trial following the Witch trial in which "Goody" Knapp's husband, Roger Knapp, attempted to sue Thomas Ludlow for defamation of his wife's character and her hanging as a convicted witch. The story of Mary Sherwood's involvement with Goody Knapp is also found in Witchcraft Trials of Connecticut, by R. G. Tomlinson, "The First Comprehensive, Documented History of Witchcraft Trials in Colonial Connecticut, copyright 1978 by R. G. Tomlinson, printed by The Bond Press, Inc., Hartford, Conn., pp. 7-9. The Court case is also found in History of Fairfield No. II, Suit of Thomas Staples Against Roger Ludlow, New Haven Col. Rec. Vol. 3. 77-89", pp. 324-328.

Common Errors to Avoid

  • Merge Caution: Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield is not identical with Thomas Sherwood of Stratford. These men both immigrated to New England, moved to within 10 miles of each other in Connecticut, and died within 3 years of each other. However, records easily show they are not identical.
  • Birth date: His baptism and origins have not yet been discovered. Therefore, any precise date is incorrect. He was stated to age 48 in 1634, and so born about 1586.
  • Birth date and place: He is sometimes said to have been baptized at St Nicholas Parish, Ipswich, co. Suffolk, England in 1585. However, no such record occurs in the parish records of St. Nicholas. [14]
  • Incorrect name of first wife (Seabrook): The name of his first wife can sometimes be found as Alice Seabrook. This is incorrect. The supposed parents "Alice Seabrook" were married 9 years after her birth. The error is certainly another confusion with Thomas Sherwood of Stratford who was married to Sarah Seabrook. She has been proven to be Alice Tiler, daughter of John Tiler.[5]
  • Incorrect name of second wife (Fitch): Older references indicate that the second wife of Thomas Sherwood was named Mary Fitch. [15] This is incorrect. The error started with the History of Fairfield in 1889 which was the first to name her as a Fitch. [16] The error was copied in many susequent secondary sources. Donald Lines Jacobus in two articles took great pains to point out that the error was likely a transcriptional error as it was Thomas' son Mathew who married Mary Fitch. [17] [18] There is absolutely no evidence or clue as to maiden name of Mary.
  • Incorrect name of second wife (Onge): A more recent theory which is becoming more widely distributed on the internet is that the second wife of Thomas Sherwood was named Mary Onge. The theory is highly speculative and contains no real evidence that this is true. Mary Onge was a fellow passenger on the Francis, aged 27 in 1634. She was almost certainly the daughter of Frances Ong who immigrated to Watertown, Massachusetts several years before. Other than Mary Onge immigrating on the same ship as Thomas Sherwood, there is nothing to connect them. They settled in different towns, and there are no records to connect the families.
  • Incorrect daughter: The wife of Thomas Merritt is sometimes said to be Elizabeth or Jane, a daughter of Thomas Sherwood. Merritt researchers have shown this to be incorrect and she is Jane Unknown. Furthermore, there is no evidence that Thomas Sherwood had a daughter Elizabeth in the parish records, his will, his wife's will, or estate records. This incorrect daughter has been disconnected from this profile.
  • Marriage date and place: He is sometimes said to have married his first wife Alice on 21 October 1604 in Ipswich, co. Suffolk, England. There is no evidence to support this date or place. His children were baptized at Kettlebaston, and Alice was from nearby Hitcham. An extensive search of parishes around Kettlebaston failed to find the marriage of Thomas and Alice. [5]
  • Incorrect daughter (Margaret): Margaret Sheerwood who married Eliza3 Maverick was not a daughter of Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield. There is some controversy regarding this person. Jacobus and Prindle both concluded that Thomas had a daughter Margaret based on his will - they read 'Mary' as 'Marg'. However they working from a highly damaged transcription; Andrew Sherwood's renders the name as Mary. We now know from Kettlebaston parish records that Thomas had two daughters named Mary but no daughter named Margaret. The facts that the marriage of Margaret Sherwood and Elias Maverick took place in Charlestown in 1669, and that he was born in 1643 also argues strongly that this Margaret could not be a daughter of Thomas Sherwood. See Sherwood article in TAG 2005 for a complete discussion. [2]
  • Incorrect parents: He is sometimes said to be the son of Esdras Sherwood and Dorcas Unknown of Ipswich, co. Suffolk, England. Esdras Sherwood did have two children baptized at St. Nicholas in Ipswich, but no Thomas.[14] While Esdras and his wife cannot be excluded with 100% certainty as the parents of Thomas, there is absolutely no evidence (by will or baptisms) to connect this Sherwood family in Ipswich to Thomas Sherwood of Kettlebaston, England and Fairfield, Connecticut. [2]
  • Incorrect parents: A previous profile made his parents to be John Sherwood and Joan Sherwyn. The origins of Thomas Sherwood have recently been published and there is no evidence to support these parents. [2] They have been disconnected. His parents are unknown.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume VI, R-S. (Boston: NEHGS, 2009):304-312, biography of Thomas Sherwood. Available at AmericanAncestors.org PAID
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 The American Genealogist, vol. 80 (2005): pages 278-282. The English Home of Thomas Sherwood1 of Wethersfield, Stamford, and Fairfield, Conn., by Leslie Mahler. AmericanAncestors.org link.
  3. Sometimes Kettle Baston as 2 words in older records.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Hotten, John Camden, ed., The Original Lists of Persons of Quality ... (London, 1874):278-79. Ancestry.com LINK or Link at archive
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 The American Genealogist, vol. 82 (2007):211-213. The Parentage of Alice Tiler, First Wife of Thomas Sherwood1 of Wethersfield, Stamford, and Fairfield, Conn., by Leslie Mahler, FASG.
  6. The American Genealogist vol. 78 (January 2003):37-41. English Relatives of Samuel Barrett1 of Yonkers, New York and his Sister Hannah (Barrett) (Jenner), wife of John1 Coe of Connecticut and New York, and Mother of Samuel1 Jenner of Woodbury, Connecticut, by Mahler, Leslie.
  7. Jacobus, Donald Lines. History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield, Volume 1. (Fairfield, 1930):553. Books.google.com Snippet View
  8. Find-a-grave website: Memorial #9072676
  9. Ancestry.com (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/9049/images/007627300_00013). Connecticut, U.S., Wills and Probate Records, 1609-1999 [database on-line], Fairfield, Probate Records, Vol. 1-5, 1648-1750, image 13-14. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015.Original data: Connecticut County, District and Probate Courts.The record is not indexed and is damaged at the top of the page. Very difficult to read. Starts on the right-hand side of the book. Inventory is on the second image. (Two free ancestry.com images: (1). https://www.ancestry.com/sharing/26284634?h=2512c1&utm_campaign=bandido-webparts&utm_source=post-share-modal&utm_medium=copy-url ; (2). https://www.ancestry.com/sharing/26284656?h=e5da9c&utm_campaign=bandido-webparts&utm_source=post-share-modal&utm_medium=copy-url)
  10. 10.0 10.1 Sherwood, Andrew. Daniel L. Sherwood and his paternal ancestors : including Sherwood evidences both in England and America... (Portland, 1929):38.
  11. Photo of Memorial Find a grave 1037956. Thomas Sherwood. Old Burial Ground, Fairfield, Connecticut.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Trumbull, J. Hammond. (transcriber). The Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut Prior to the Union with New Haven Colony May 1665. Hartford: Brown and Parsons, 1850. AKA Colonial Records of Connecticut. Volume I. 1636-1665 (deputy pp 130, 195, 207, 248, 261; war committee p. 264)
  13. Stiles, Henry Reed. and Sherman W. Adams. The History of Ancient Wethersfield Connecticut... Vol I – History, Part 1. New York: The Grafton Press., 1903.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Cookson, Rev. Edward, ed. The registers of St. Nicholas, Ipswich, Co. Suffolk. Baptisms, 1539-1709. Burials, 1551-1710. Marriages, 1539-1710. (London: Parish Register Society, 1897):42-43. Archive.org LINK
  15. eg. New England Historical and Genealogical Register vol. 92 no. 3 (July 1938):203. The Second Wife of Joseph Loomis of Windsor, Conn., by Elisha S. Loomis.
  16. Schenk, Elizabeth Hubbell Godfrey The History of Fairfield, Fairfield County, Connecticut, from the Settlement of the Town in 1639 to 1818: 1639-1700. (1889):351, 408. Google.Books.com LINK
  17. The American Genealogist, vol. 27 (1950):156-159. Repercussions II: Sherwood of Fairfield and Stratford, Conn., by Donald Lines Jacobus.
  18. New England Historical and Genealogical Register vol. 92 no. 3 (July 1938):303. The Second Wife of Joseph Loomis of Windsor, Conn., by Donald Lines Jacobus.
Source list:
  • The American Genealogist, vol. 27 (1950):156-159. 'Repercussions II: Sherwood of Fairfield and Stratford, Conn., by Donald Lines Jacobus.
  • The American Genealogist, vol. 50 (2005):278-282. The English Home of Thomas Sherwood1 of Wethersfield, Stamford, and Fairfield, Conn., by Leslie Mahler. AmericanAncestors.org ($) LINK
  • The American Genealogist, vol. 52 (2007):211-2013. The Parentage of Alice Tiler, First Wife of Thomas Sherwood1 of Wethersfield, Stamford, and Fairfield, Conn., by Leslie Mahler, FASG.
  • Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume VI, R-S. (Boston: NEHGS, 2009):304-312, biography of Thomas Sherwood. Available at AmericanAncestors.org PAID
  • Hotten, John Camden, ed., The Original Lists of Persons of Quality ... (London, 1874):278-79. Ancestry.com LINK
  • Schenk, Elizabeth Hubbell Godfrey The History of Fairfield, Fairfield County, Connecticut, from the Settlement of the Town in 1639 to 1818: 1639-1700. (1889):351, 408. Google.Books.com LINK
  • Sherwood, Andrew. Daniel L. Sherwood and his paternal ancestors : including Sherwood evidences both in England and America... (Portland, 1929).
  • Daughters of American Colonists Vol. 15 p 302:
  • Genealogies of Connecticut Families, Vol II, Page 425.
  • "A Changing America: Seen Through One Sherwood Family" gives a description of the witch trial and execution.
  • New England Historical and Genealogical Register Vols. 1 - 148,dated 1887 through 1994. (Vols. 1,14,27,39, and 92 especially.)
  • History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield, Vol. 1, compiled and edited by Donald Lines Jacobs - 1932.
  • Catalogue of Names of the Early Puritan Settlers of the Colony of Connecticut by Royal R. Hinman 1852
  • Directory of Ancestral Heads of New England Families, 1620 - 1700, compiled by Frank R. Holmes.
  • Connecticut Ancestors of Bergen Chapter Members (DAR) by Mrs. Ella Sherwood - 1938
  • Genealogical Gleanings in England by Henry F. Waters, NEH&GR - 1901
  • International Genealogical Indexes - LDS Family History Centers Parish Registers of Wingate, Buckinghamshire, England (GS Microfilm)
  • Parish Registers of St.Nicholas, Ipswich, Suffolk, England (GS Microfilm).
  • Frederick C. Hart Jr., "Sherwood Notes: New Discoveries Complicate the Thomas Sherwood Picture", Connecticut Ancestry, Reference Volume 59 (February 2017), pages 101-109
  • Connecticut, U.S., Deaths and burials Index: "Connecticut, U.S., Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934"
    FHL Film Number: 3200
    Ancestry Record 2557 #1703483 (accessed 13 February 2024)
    Thomas Sherwood death (age 67) in Connecticut.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 52

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Sherwood-169 and Sherwood-62 do not represent the same person because: Easily confused but not the same man
posted by Anne B
I am a descendant of Thomas Sherwood Sr., I recently released my DNA to this site, so it should populate shortly.
posted by Robert Sherwood
You'll need to complete your lineage to connect yourself to this profile, Robert. So far your earliest ancestor on the Sherwood line is Stephen Sherwood b. 1804. A sourced (paper) trail is needed to go along with the DNA info. Hope this helps: Help: DNA Confirmation. (And I'm no expert on DNA, but a G2G post will gather a lot of help from the community if you have questions.)
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Thank you, Bobbie. Yes, I am building the direct line a little daily, but as a student at Penn State, my time is limited.
posted by Robert Sherwood
A descendant of this Thomas Sherwood who has a YDNA test whould come forward to help resove the lineage.
posted by Gil Hurlbut
Is it reasonable to assume that Thomas' second wife, Mary, immigrated to New England vs. being born in New England? If so, we should include her in PGM. Also, with the uncertainty as to her last name, adding PPP as well seems prudent.

Thoughts?

posted by S (Hill) Willson
Her baptismal record appears in a Parish in Lavenham, England, dated 3/23/1605-6. I have seen the record, but do not have a copy presently to send you. She was first born and had numerous brothers and sisters, also baptized in Lavenham.

Considering her birth year as 1606, logic must tell you that it would have been virtually impossible for her to have been born in New England.

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Thanks Gene. I am confused, though. Mary's last name is unknown, so I'm not sure how we would know her baptism information. Are there sources for her parentage that you can add?

Edited to add: Are you assuming the baptism information for Mary Onge is this Mary's?

posted by S (Hill) Willson
edited by S (Hill) Willson
Miss S - yes, I am assuming Mary Onge - Her parental and sibling baptismal, marital records etc are all available on several databases. I used "Find my past", which I believe to be the most reliable for English Parish Records. Mary (Marie) was the first child of Edmund Onge and Francis (Reid) Onge, born in 1606 in the Parish in Laveham, Suffolk County, England.

However, I spent two weeks in The Suffolk County Records Center in Bury St. Edmunds two years ago, and confirmed that information by viewing a transcription on Microfilm of the actual Lavenham Parish Register. I did not make copies as I had hundreds of items to look for, and I was satisfied that the documents noted by "Find My Past" were correct.

I am returning to Suffolk County with Geoff Sherwood in May to resume our search for the birth location and parents of Thomas Sherwood. I would be happy to make copies of the Onge data in the Lavenham Parish Records for you, but that still would not prove that she was Thomas's 2nd wife.

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Sounds reasonable. I would also suggest changing the birthplace to generic England. As a second wife, there's a good chance that she was born earlier than 1620.
posted by M Cole
The profile states: His baptism and origins have not yet been discovered. Therefore, any precise date is incorrect. He was stated to age 48 in 1634, and so born about 1586.

With this in view, should he still be kept as a son of Esdras Sherwood of Ipswich?

posted by David Mortimer
I have removed the incorrect parents (again).
posted by Joe Cochoit
Thanks Joe, why are you not one of the profile managers! You have done some nice work on this profile.
posted by David Mortimer
I suggest that the section about the witchcraft trial be in Research Notes or its own section, rather than In Education. Since it is one of the few documented witchcraft trials in Connecticut it is important.
posted by Ellen Gustafson
Profile managers, there is an unusually high number of profile managers for this profile. Unless you are actively researching this profile, please consider shifting your status to Trusted List; you'll still receive notifications of changes through your Family Activity Feed (which is also accessible from your "My wikitree" menu at any time). Thank you.
posted by Jillaine Smith
BeBe, please read this profile carefully, especially the errors section. It is highly researched and highly sourced, The answers to all you questions are in there. The LNAB of his second wife is unknown - it is not Mary Fitch. Also he did not marry anyone with a LNAB of Seabrook - it is another common error.
posted by Joe Cochoit
The Likely name of the 2nd wife of this Thomas Sherwood (1586) was Mary Onge. She was a single passenger on the Ship Francis, with the Sherwoods, and she lived nearby the Sherwoods in Kettlebaston, England. There is a lengthy paper on this topic posted on other web sites such as FTDNA and Geni.

For anyone who would like a copy of that paper - please email [email address removed] and identify your origin as Wikitree Member

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Gene, perhaps you can simply advise us of the full source information of this paper to which you refer, ie. author, title, publication, etc. and even a short synopsis so that we can determine its usefulness.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
edited by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
I wouldn't call it likely. The only actual evidence is that both women were named Mary. Gene are you referring to your own theory and article found here:

http://www.sherwoodfam.plus.com/emigration_from_uk.htm

posted by Joe Cochoit
Joe,

Yes, you are correct. But this was an attachment to another article written by Geoff Sherwood - not the full body of my report. The idea was originally proposed in a book that I referenced in my citations, so I put a great deal of research into the proposal that Mary Onge had become Mary Sherwood. To say that the only evidence is that both women were named Mary is a serious understatement.

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Gene,

Can you be less cryptic and tell us what book you are referring to? Also, can you summarize any evidence that suggests Mary Onge is the same person as Mary Sherwood? All I see is two people named Mary and then a lot of speculation that in no way ties Mary Onge to Thomas Sherwood.

posted by Joe Cochoit
Does your paper contain more than what is in your article, entitled, "Evidence for Identifying Mary Onge of Lavenham, Suffolk, England, as the Second Wife of Thomas Sherwood of Wethersfield and Fairfield, Connecticut" in Connecticut Ancestry Vol 63 (2021)? The article there is well-sourced, but still seems to be lacking solid documentation connecting Thomas Sherwood and Mary Onge. The coincidences are compelling, but that doesn't quite make the case, even though I wish it did.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Miss Wilson,

Thank you for your comments. No, there is no one document that PROVES the relationship and in all of my correspondence over the years I've never attempted to state that it was proven. So, you are correct - compelling only. However, have you found a better case? For what it is worth, and for background, I was not the first to propose this relationship between Thomas and Mary. It was first noted in "A Changing America seen through one Family Line 1634-2006" by Frank P. and Francis H Sherwood, copywritten in 2006. I am fortunate enough to be a direct descendant of both Thomas Sherwood (1586) and Henry Chamberlain (1592), both of which landed in Massachusetts in the 1630's. I've done extensive genealogy research here in the US and some in Suffolk, England. I have always attempted to look at genealogy from a "practical" lens.

So, the story presented by Frank and Frances intrigued me and I attempted to research it in depth. I found that Mary's mother had owned a shop in Lavenum and the family was apparently well known there. As noted in my paper, one of Alice (Tiler) Sherwood's sisters had also lived in Lavenham. No, I can't prove that she personally knew the Onge's, but that is tempting. I attempted to locate the will of Mrs. Onge in Watertown, Mass, thinking it might give me a clue - but the will (and others of the same year) is missing. I looked at the properties that Mrs. Onge had been granted and who they were passed on to (presumably through a will). The long story short is that there is no known other documentation that can prove Mary Onge to be the second wife of Thomas Sherwood. Likewise, there is no documentation to disprove it. When or if someone can find other circumstantial or factual information about that identity, I'll be the first to be thankful that such evidence has been uncovered. btw, in most of my releases, I did either begin or end the paper with the proviso that there was no physical proof.

Changing the topic - you may not be aware that there is a significant YDNA project in Family Tree DNA that is tracking the Sherwoods. We are now able to identify some descendants of Thomas (Fairfield) and 1st Wife Alice, Thomas (Fairfield) and 2nd wife Mary, AND Thomas (Stratford) and wife Sarah. We have proven through YDNA that the two men were related, perhaps as uncle and nephew. This is news, because for years historians and genealogists confused the two men factually and in later years many made the assumption that the two were not related. I am one of three "Co-administrators" of that Sherwood project, and would be happy to share some statistics and actual STR and SNP comparisons - where we have DNA AND documentation to back up the relationships. If you or anyone reading this message would like to know more - I'll be happy to share but only through email. I can be contacted at [email address removed]

posted by Gene Chamberlain
HELP PLEASE!!! I am a descendant of Thomas Sherwood through his son Matthew Sherwood b. abt 1644 - Stratford, CT and d. about 16 Oct 1715 - Bridgeport, Fairfield, CT. Matthew married (or so I believe) a Mary FITCH b. abt 1643 - Norwalk, CT and d. abt 25 Dec 1730.

I don't think she is the same Mary FITCH who is listed as supposedly marrying Thomas Sherwood. I am so confused by all of this! Also my 8th great grandmother was Sara/Sarah Emma Faith SEABROOK(E) b. abt. 28 Dec 1608 - England and d. abt 23 Oct 1658 - CT married Thomas Fairchild (1610-1670) I believe she was his first wife. He later married a woman named Catherine but I don't have her last or maiden name. Also, do you know when the headstone or the plaques on it were placed/made? Thank you for any help you can provide.

Bebe

Perhaps you have received numerous responses before now, but if not:

The 2nd wife of Thomas Sherwood Sr (1586) was mistakenly listed as Mary Fitch in a poorly researched document sometime around 1890, which was repeated several times in later family trees. Mary Fitch was, if fact, the wife of your Mathew, the son of Thomas Sr. and Mary.

Additionally, the true name of Mary the 2nd wife of Thomas Sherwood Sr, was most likely Onge, a single passenger who had been on the same ship Francis with the Sherwoods when they emigrated from Ipswich in 1634. There is a lengthy document on this topic of the identity of Thomas's second wife - important to you because she would have been your Mathew's mother.

Finally, after lengthy research, I found the birth location of the last two Seabrooke children, Emma and Sarah. There was no Sara/Sarah/Emma/Faith - - - only two daughters Emma and Sarah as the last two children of Robert Seabrooke. I have transcriptions of their birth records. Emma later married Thomas Fairchild (in England) as his first wife as you noted. She later died in Stratford, Ct, USA. Fairchild returned to England after Emma died, and married Catherine in London. Emma's sister and youngest daughter of Robert Seabrooke married the "other" Thomas Sherwood of Stratford in Stratford in about 1642. Fairfield and Sherwood were brothers in law before Emma died and both were among 17 men/families regarded as the "founders" of Stratford.

There has never been any evidence to suggest that the two Thomas Sherwoods were related. It has been presumed, perhaps correctly that the two men had an age difference of about 25 years. However, just within the past week, (April 2021) Y-DNA results conducted on a number of living Sherwood descendants have proven that the two separate Thomas Sherwoods of Fairfield and Stratford were actually related, perhaps as Uncle and Nephew or grand-Nephew. In other words, the two men came from a common ancestor in England - possibly the Father of Thomas (Fairfield) and a brother who had a son Thomas.

If you wish to see documentation, there are several different docs that I can send you. Email me at Chamberg925@ gmail.com and ask for:

1) Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield (1586-1655) (which includes a lengthy addenda on Mary Onge) 2) Thomas Sherwood of Stratford ( ? - 1657) (Also discusses Seabrooke relationships) 3) Seabrooke evidence for Emma, Sarah and father Robert 4) Y-DNA Chart and evidence of relationship between Sherwoods of Fairfield and Stratford.

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Bebe,

I'm replying to a post that you made 4 1/2 years ago. Since that time, I have become heavily involved in DNA research on the Sherwoods, and I'm intrigued by the fact that you are descended from Thomas Sherwood and his son Matthew Sherwood. Among the Sherwoods in our research, we have identified several descended from Thomas (Fairfield) and his first wife Alice, Thomas (Fairfield) and his second wife Mary and Thomas (Stratford) and his wife Sarah. However, those descended from Thomas (Fairfield) and Mary are further descended from their first son Stephen and their last son Isaac. We do not have any DNA sample for a descendant of Matthew.

If you are a direct line descendant of Thomas & Mary > Matthew, and have a living father or son, I would encourage you to have him take a DNA test with Family Tree DNA. If this is the case, PLEASE contact me at [email address removed] for more information. If you would like to discuss further on the phone, email me and I'll respond with my phone number.

Thanks.

Gene

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Nancy, Thomas could not have been born in Connecticut based on his birth date of 1590. You have his mother as Alice Tiler

who according to the other profiles of Thomas Thomas Sherwood and Thomas Sherwood which are probably duplicates as well as the Thomas you created Thomas Sherwood is actually his wife not his mother. Could you please take a look. You might want to propose some merges. Jim

posted by James Carr
Sherwood-1356 and Sherwood-62 appear to represent the same person because: They have similar dates and married to the same women. Sherwood-1356 was in fact supposed to represent the same person as Sherwood-62 (although some of the profile info was in error due to the widespread errors on the internet and other in sources).
posted by Daniel Nordlund
Sherwood-1356 clearly was meant to be this Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield. However, the biography contains many of the errors which great effort was put into removing from this profile. As Sherwood-1356 has no parents or children, the best of course of action is to delete the entire biography of Sherwood 1356 and merge it into Sherwood-62.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Sherwood-1356 and Sherwood-62 do not represent the same person because: The information does not match. There were three Thomas Sherwoods in Fairfield country CT in the mid 1600s. Sherwood-1356 does not seem to match any of them.
posted by Bill Buchanan
Bill,

I recognize your name from as you were on an email list of Sherwood descendants that I had communicated with. However, you must have changed your email address as I received an error message the last time I sent a group text.

You will be interested to know that very recent Y-DNA tests on living Sherwoods have proven that Thomas Sherwood of Fairfield and Thomas Sherwood of Stratford were related, probably as Uncle / Nephew or grand Nephew. Email me if you are interested in that topic or would like a chart of Y-DNA37 and Y-DNA67 results with family lines identified.

Gene Chamberlain (Mother maiden name Sherwood) [email address removed]

posted by Gene Chamberlain
Sherwood-1356 and Sherwood-62 appear to represent the same person because: Similar personal information, similar history, married to the same two women.
posted by Daniel Nordlund
What was Anderson thinking when he said this Thomas Sherwood resident of Fairfield was "One of three Stratford members of a Connecticut Colony committee to “press men and necessaries in each town, for this expedition [to Narragansett],” 3 October 1654 [CCCR 1:264]."? The sentence clearly states the Stratford members. The Colonial record states: "For Stratford, Tho: Sherwood & Tho: Fairechild, with the Assistant & Constable : For Fairefeild, Mr. Ward & Allexander Knowles, with the Constable :" I am removing the sentence.
posted by Anne B
Typo in Alice Tylers baptism? TAG 82 and Anderson both have 16 Nov 1585.
posted by Anne B