no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Swain) Smithwick (abt. 1693 - abt. 1738)

Mary Smithwick formerly Swain aka Swaine
Born about in Chowan, Carolinamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 45 in Bertie, North Carolinamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Rodney Bowers private message [send private message] and Becky Wright private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 7 Mar 2012
This page has been accessed 1,075 times.

Biography

Spouse: Samuel Smithwick

Mary (named after Stephen's mother) must have been born by about 1694. She was married to Samuel Smithwick by about 1714, and had her first child (Sarah Smithwick) by about 1715. Mary's brother John, Stephen and Elizabeth's Swain's eldest son, (he was named after Stephen's father), appears in a July 1716 court record in Chowan County, wherein he dismisses his guardian, indicating he has achieved the age of majority [21], proving he was born by 1695. Mary is not mentioned; she was certainly older than John, and married to Samuel Smithwick two years earlier, by 1714, indicating her birth before 1694. Mary and John's sister, Stephen and Elizabeth's daughter Elizabeth (named after her mother Elizabeth's mother), must have been born after 1698; John retained her guardianship, and indentured her as a servant to John Worley, on 17 July 1716. She had to be under 18 on that date, and perhaps younger.

Mary and Samuel's first child Sarah (named after Samuel's mother Sarah Elizabeth Woolard, the second wife of Samuel's father Edward Smithwick) was born by about 1715. Mary and Samuel's second daughter Elizabeth (named after Mary's mother) was married, to William Ross, by 1730; she and William's first son, Captain William Ross Jr., was born in 1731. Daughter Sarah married Luke Mizell about 1740; she and Luke's daughter Sarah Mizell married Benjamin Richardson c 1767. Not much is known about Mary and Samuel's son John.

Some trees show Mary's husband as John Smithwick, but the will of John, 18 June 1764 in Bertie County, names children William, Luke, Joel, Sarah, Mary, and Cloanah, who of course do not match the names of the Smithwick grandchildren in the will of Patience, Mary's stepmother.

From "The Kenan family and some allied families," compiled by Alvaretta Kenan Register:

""RICHARDSON Many of the early settlers of Effingham, Screven, and Bulloch Counties in Georgia, were of North Carolina stock. This was the case of the Richardson family. 1. Benjamin Richardson, b. ca 1740; m. 1767, Sarah Mizell, dau. of Luke Mizell IV and his wife Sarah Smithwick, dau. of Samuel Smithwick and Mary Swaine. Benjamin and wife Sarah, with Sarah's widowed mother Mrs. Sarah Mizell, migrated to the area that is now Bulloch County, in 1770. Benjamin took up land on Scull's Creek near the Ogeechee River. He was tax collector in the three year period before Screven Co. was cutoff into Bulloch Co. Benjamin Richardson died in Bulloch Co. in 17991. Issue: [Deed Book A, pg. 59].""

See also "Georgia Genealogical Magazine" #4 pages 174-5.

[1]

Footnotes

  1. Find A Grave: Memorial #116478370.

End Notes

The Washington County Genealogical Society (WCGS) Journal, December 1995, p 76, (Contains significant misinformation).

  • Descendant family data files.




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Swaine-356 and Swain-485 appear to represent the same person because: The final e in the profile Swaine-356 is not supported by any data, and yet this represents the same person.
posted by Chad Olivent
Swain-1559 and Swain-485 appear to represent the same person because: The two records have the same father and the same birth date.
posted by Jane Chesson

S  >  Swain  |  S  >  Smithwick  >  Mary (Swain) Smithwick