no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Joseph Worley Sr. (1703 - 1757)

John Joseph Worley Sr.
Born in Buckingham, Buckingham, Colony of Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 53 in Cumberland, Cumberland, Colony of Virginiamap
Profile last modified | Created 31 May 2011
This page has been accessed 3,597 times.

Contents

Biography

Father Edward Worley

Lovick Worley, of Tyrrell. January 24, 1754 ; March Court, 1754 ; daughter Ann Gray Worley, wife Ann, brother John, brother-in law William Gray, uncle James Blount, friend Thomas Whitmell.[1]

Marriage

  • Esther Blount
  • Family Data Collection - Individual Records
Name: John Worley
Spouse: Esther Blount
Parents: Edward Worley
Birth Place: Buckingham County, VA
Birth Date: 1698
Marriage Place: Henrico County, VA
Marriage Date: 1716
Death Place: Will, Cumberlund County, VA
Death Date: 27 Mar 1757
Source Citation
Birth year: 1698; Birth city: Buckingham County; Birth state: VA
Source Information
Edmund West, comp.. Family Data Collection - Individual Records

Death

Death:
Date: Will Proved 1795 Feb
Place: Cumberland, Cumberland, Virginia

Burial

Burial:
Date: 1795
Place: Cumberland, Cumberland, Virginia

Note

Note: Will dated 3-22-1757 Cumberland, Co., Virginia

Ancestral File Number

Ancestral File Number: BFTG-HB

Research Notes

Conflicting vital information in a merge 12/2022:

  • Born Jun 1703 in Buckingham, Buckingham, Virginia, United States
  • Died Mar 1757 at age 53 in Cumberland, Cumberland, Virginia, United States
  • Born 1698 in Buckingham, Henrico, Virginia
  • Died 27 Mar 1795 at about age 97 in Cumberland, Cumberland, Virginia, United States

Sources

  1. The North Carolina Historical and Genealogical Register by Hathaway page 80


Acknowledgments

  • WikiTree profile Worley-120 created through the import of OliveMinverva.ged on Aug 5, 2011 by Ryan Davis.
  • WikiTree profile Worley-98 created through the import of Lea and Randol and Ely and Si.ged on May 31, 2011 by Maude Randol.
  • Thank you to William Agee for creating WikiTree profile Worley-364 through the import of JOSHUAAGEEEXPORT.GED on Nov 23, 2013.




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Worley-3676 and Worley-98 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same father, similar birth year
posted by Neal Parker
Thanks for your input. We could have done without the exclamation points! I would encourage you to get in here and make the corrections. :) Cheers!
posted by Chad Olivent
1. There is no documentation as to the place of birth for John Worley Sr. John's first appearance in era records show that William Kennon was awarded a 50-acre headcount 14 July 1718 for transporting ten persons, including John Worley, to Henrico County, VA. On 2 Sept 1720 John and his wife Martha (???) Worley bought 55 acres on Swift Creek in Henrico County, VA, the place where he lived.

2. There is no documentation or implied connections between John Worley Sr. and Edward Worley!

3. John Worley's wife was NOT Esther BLOUNT! Esther Blount married a comtemporary John Worley in North Carolina. This is evidenced by a marriage record.

4. The date shown for when John's will was proven was not in 1795. "At a court held for Cumberland County the 27 day of March 1758, the last will of John (Sr) Worley, decd, was proved by the witnesses hereto and by the court ordered to be recorded." (The writing is very faded.). It seems strange that the Day and Month of his Will and the Proven date are the same but exactly one year apart.

Note 1. The children of John and Martha were, per his will: John (Jr/II), William, Mary Esther (Maxey), Christian (Agee), Jude (Smith), Elizabeth (Gibson), It is believed by some that Lovick (born ~1727) was another son but it's unknown as to why he wasn't in John's will.

Note 2: Southam Parish conducted Sunday services at Worley's Reading Place (his home) for many years. On 16 Sept 1748 South Chapel, which was located near John Worley's home (which was on land that became a part of Cumberland Co., VA in 1749) was accepted by the parish and John Worley was named as Sexton for same. John was paid 500 lbs of tobacco per year until his death in 1757. Upon his death his wife Esther became the Sexton and rec'd the same amount annually. The position of Sexton was appointed to William Worley, a son of John and Esther, upon the death of Esther in 1772. The original Worley homestead and South Chapel were now located in Goochland Co., VA.

Note 3. Big-Y DNA testing at Family Tree DNA shows that this Commenter, Harry (Worley) Dunn, whose 7th GGFather was John Worley Sr, is a match to Ralph Blankenship (born ~1662, died 1714). Ralph and John knew each other in Henrico/Goochland/Cumberland/Chesterfield Counties. John and Esther Worley patented 277 acres next to Ralph's widow, Martha, on 17 Aug 1725. All the facts, combined with circumstantial evidence, points to the possibility that John Worley Sr was a son of Ralph Blankenship, or possibly Ralph's father.

posted by Harry Worley
Worley-3343 and Worley-98 appear to represent the same person because: clear duplicate
posted by Mark Burch
Worley-2794 and Worley-98 appear to represent the same person because: duplicate
posted by Chad Olivent
Worley-341 and Worley-98 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate with same parents, same spouse, and same children
posted by Topher Sims
Worley-1117 and Worley-341 appear to represent the same person because: duplicates
posted by Doug Lockwood
Worley-364 and Worley-98 appear to represent the same person because: SAME NAME, same wife, same time frame, part of the confusion, I have 3 John Worley's in a row. John 1698, john 1720, John 1735. I do not have 1 person living that long.
Worley-562 and Worley-364 appear to represent the same person because: same name, close to exact in birth and death, same place and time frame, I would merge thanks

W  >  Worley  >  John Joseph Worley Sr.