no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Rebecka (Andriesen) Smith (abt. 1699 - 1785)

Rebecka Smith formerly Andriesen aka Anderson
Born about in Burlington, New Jerseymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1717 in New Jerseymap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 86 in Cedar Creek, Randolph, North Carolina, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 22 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 285 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Rebecka (Andriesen) Smith was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Biography

Rebecka Andriesen (aka Anderson) was one of eight children born to Cornelius Andriesen and Annetje Opdyck of New York: Eliakim, John, Abraham, Cornelius, Bartholomew, Andrew, and Fransinah.

She was born about 6 Jan 1699 in Burlington County, New Jersey, which became Hunterdon County in 1714. Rebecka and her brothers, Abraham, Bartholomew, and Andrew were baptized on 6 June 1710 at the Reformed Nether Dutch Church, in Southampton, Bucks, Pennsylvania, by Rev. Paulus van Vleq, [1]

Rebecka married John Smith about 1717/1718. Their children include:

  • 1. Andrew Smith, 1718–1775
  • 2. Thomas Smith, 1720–1751
  • 3. James Smith, 1730–1781
  • 4. Catherine Smith, 1735–1783
  • 5. Samuel Smith, 1737–Deceased
  • 6 Anderson John Smith, 1743–1809
  • 7. Francina Smith, 1746–1811

Rebecka died 12 Aug 1785 (aged 86) in Rowan County, North Carolina and was buried at Eatons Baptist Church Cemetery in Mocksville, Davie County, North Carolina, United States. [2]

Research Notes

Rebecka's father, [Cornelius Anderson, son of Joachim Andrieszen] married Annetje Opdyck in 1690 in Hopewell Twp. They had eight children: Eliakim in 1690, John, Abraham, Cornelius in 1698, Rebecca in 1700, Bartholomew in 1706, Andrew about 1710 and Fransinah about 1714. The birth years of the other two are unknown.

Rebecka's grandparents, Jochem Andriessen (aka Anderson) and Emmete Jans migrated from Amsterdam, Holland and settled in Newtown, Long Island, New York. Jochem was founder of Elizabethtown, NJ. Three of Jochem's sons, Enoch, Cornelius and Joshua married three of the daughters of Johannes Opdyck and removed to live in Johannes household, to New Jersey in the late seventeenth century. [3]

Rebecka, who married John Smith, had a sister, Catherine Cornelisse (Anderson) Vannoy (1697-1727). Catherine married Francis Vannoy (1688-1774) in 1715. Some researchers have listed Francis Vannoy’s wife as Rebecca Anderson rather than Catherine Anderson. One source has even combined the names and called her Catherine Rebecca Anderson. That Francis’ wife Catherine was the daughter of Cornelius Anderson is proven by the inclusion of Francis Vannoy in the will of Cornelius Anderson which was filed in Hunterdon County on May 30, 1724. That her name was Catherine is shown by a deed from Francis and Catherine Vannoy dated 16 August 1716 in Kent County, Delaware.

Sources

  1. "Pennsylvania Births and Christenings, 1709-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:V2V2-HCV : 15 February 2020), Rebecka Andriesen, 1710.
  2. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/207793573/rebecca-smith
  3. Colonial Families of the United States
  • Origins of the Jersey Settlement of Rowan County, North Carolina. First Families of Jersey Settlement. By Ethel Stroupe 1996. (Reprinted by permission of the author from vol. 11, no. 1, February 1996, Rowan County Register, PO Box 1948, Salisbury, NC 28145))




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Rebecka by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rebecka:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 19

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
First - Thank you project team. I'm not at this same level of research yet.

Rebecka appears to be my 6th great-grandaunt, and I want to update my private tree. Why is Rebecka under name Anderson if she was born Andreisen? Am I wrong? Was there a birth record that showed her name to be Anderson? Was there a specific date on which her father changed his name from Kornelis Andriesen to Cornelius Anderson?

posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Karen Wendell
Anderson is simply an anglicized version of Andreisen. This happens in many family histories and trees. She shows as Anderson in the marriage and death records. histories.
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Michael Sanderson
The birth record shows the name as Andriesen. That should be the primary name with Anderson as an alternative name.
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Jim Moore
Thanks for that analysis, Jim.
posted by Ellen Smith
Addressing the WHY question: At least six different profiles were created for this woman here on WikiTree, all of them apparently with the last name of Anderson. That's probably due to the common practice of American family history buffs to standardize their ancestors' names to an anglicized version (or in this case, I suppose it would be "suecized" for the Swedish name). We don't like to change LNABs until we have a pretty good idea what the correct (or at least best estimate) LNAB is. For a long time the profile was in a "Needs LNAB" category because it was recognized that her last-name assignment needed to be reviewed (and probably changed), but the profile didn't have good sources -- including the sources needed to determine her LNAB. Since then, various WikiTreers have researched her, so we have the information we were waiting for.

Thanks for pointing out the need for a change. I've now revised her LNAB.

posted by Ellen Smith
Appears the marriage date of 1742 is incorrect. Should it be 1718?
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Allice (Burns) Reynolds
Indeed, there is no indication of a source for that 8 August 1742 date on either Rebecka's profile or John's. The information on both profiles suggests a date of 1717 or 1718. Does anyone know of a basis for the 8 August 1742 date? I am inclined to speculate that it's some other couple's marriage, but that's just a guess.

FYI, the New Netherland project is not a useful resource for North Carolina records like that supposed marriage. When people move that far from New Netherland, we need to hand them off to other projects. ;-) Having said that, I also note that her biography does not discuss her move to Carolina. Does anyone have information to add?

posted by Ellen Smith
I would suggest that John Smith 1733~1795 is not a child of this Rebecka, as 1) we are lacking any documentation here to indicate such a relationship (please correct me if I'm wrong), and 2) John's confident male line descendants' Y-DNA haplogroup has been tested as I-M253, whereas that of Rebecka's well-documented son Anderson comes out as R-M269. (Compare https://www.smithsworldwide.org/tng/smtrees.php?grouping=GRP-I-M253-6 with https://www.smithsworldwide.org/tng/smtrees.php?grouping=GRP-R-M269-57.)
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Paul Smith
Hmm... The dates alone make we wonder if all of these connected children truly had the same parents (I see three clusters of births, separated by long gaps between 1720 and 1730 and then between 1737 and 1743), and the DNA information supports the notion of a bad connection between John Smith and Anderson Smith (but not necessarily between Rebecka and Anderson, as she didn't have Y-DNA).

Remember, however, that we try to base Wikitree genealogy on genealogical paper trails, not DNA. I am particularly bothered that many Y-DNA trails determinations are based on somebody else's "confident" paper trail that I am not allowed to see. How well documented are the Y-DNA lines you refer to? Are he lineages available for review?

posted by Ellen Smith
I agree with you, Ellen, that at least some of Rebecka's relationships as shown here are questionable at best, at least due to the lack of substantiating paper trails. I also agree that the use of DNA evidence should take a back seat to such paper trails. I only included it in my earlier comment as corroboration for my opinion that John Smith in particular was not likely to have been her son.

I also see your point, Ellen, in questioning the use of Y-DNA in reference to a connection or lack thereof to Rebecka. The focus should be at this point on John Smith 1733-1795's father, not his mother, but he is missing from the profile, which throws the attention back to Rebecka. (And I'm not sure who you mean by Anderson Smith.) I think what I'm trying to say is, that if Rebecka (Andriesen) and John Smith 1698-1763 were a couple, then fine, but John Smith 1733-1795 was apparently not their son. There is quite a bit of confusion on Ancestry and also on Find A Grave regarding this family (or, more properly, these families) which appears to have been carried over here, and it would be nice to get back to basics, as it were, by only showing verifiable relationships and connections on this site.

I do have a reasonable degree of confidence in the information presented on smithsworldwide.org, but do not think it would help much at this point. What we really need is adequate documentation for the connection(s) in question, which we are lacking.

posted by Paul Smith
Yes, adequate documentation is needed, but it does often seems to be elusive. I appreciate your commitment to seeking good clues wherever they might be found.

My reference to "Anderson Smith" was to Anderson John Smith Sr. (1743-aft.1809).

posted by Ellen Smith
Anderson-20233 and Anderson-646 appear to represent the same person because: places, names and vitals match.
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Debbie (Costa) Garcia
This is likely a very interesting pioneer family. The bio consists of paragraphs pasted from other websites. The Baptist Records are stored at Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina. Other records will be stored in Raleigh, NC.

If the bio is rewritten with inline citations, the facts will become clearer. The sources which are not acceptable for pre-1700 profiles should be replaced.

posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Paula J
Anderson-34797 and Anderson-646 appear to represent the same person because: Same person. The death location was the only discrepancy noted when the last merge proposal was rejected. However, that's not really a discrepancy, since Davie County was formed from a part of Rowan County in 1836.
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Ellen Smith
I am pretty sure that he did not have 2 daughters by the same name (Rebecca Catherina (Anderson) Smith) as Leslie pointed out in Feb (even though it appears there were 2 Annetje Opdyck women in the previous generation).
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Karen Wendell
Anderson-34797 and Anderson-646 are not ready to be merged because: Death locations are different, dates are the same
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Katrina Whitaker
Anderson-646 and Anderson-34797 appear to represent the same person because: In Tree Twice
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Leslie Wayne Williamson (1959-2018)
Anderson-14753 and Anderson-11734 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth and death dates
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by Sally Stovall
Hi, MG - I see the sibling names, Anna Smith, Jean Smith, Margaret Smith, William Smith, Thomas Smith and John Smith, looking very much like the names posted for Andrew Smith, V (I believe). --- And, to the contrary, the children of Annah' and John actually were Andrew SMITH, Lt. 1718–1773, Hon. Thomas SMITH, II 1720–1751, James John SMITH, Major 1730–1781, Catherine SMITH 1735–1811, Samuel Smith b. 1737, Anderson John Smith 1743–1809, John SMITH, Jr. 1744–1800, and Francian 'Francina' Smith 1746–1811. --- Cheers, Gary Smith-53226 (Will I never stop talking? -- Addendum: 'Annah" was born 6 Jan 1698/99 in Dutch Kills ('creeks'), Queens Co., Long Island, New York Colony, dying 12 Aug 1785 in Cana, Davie Co., North Carolina. -- [finis]
posted on Anderson-646 (merged) by [Living Smith]