Hannah (Van Kleeck) Van De Bogard
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Antonetta Barentse (Van Kleeck) Van De Bogard (1770 - 1842)

Antonetta Barentse (Hannah) Van De Bogard formerly Van Kleeck
Born in Poughkeepsie, Dutchess, New York Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 71 in Palenville, Catskill, Greene, New York, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 7 May 2012
This page has been accessed 74 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Hannah (Van Kleeck) Van De Bogard was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Parents: Barent Van Kleeck Hannah Dubois

Birth

Date: September 30, 1770

Christened: October 21, 1770

Place: Poughkeepsie, The Flats, Dutchess, New York, USA

[1] [2] Parents: Father's Name: Barent Van Kleeck; Mother's Name; Annatie Duboys, Sponsors: Simeon Viele, Antonetta Van Kleeck.

Death

May 24, 1842, Palenville, Greene, New York. Find A Grave: Memorial #191425203. Note: Findagrave gives birthdate as 1768; birth record says 1770.

Church Records

Baptism
  • 1770. [Month and day illegible.] B. Sept. 30. Barent Van Kleeck, Annatie Duboys, Antonetta, Wit. Simeon Viele, Antonetta Van Kleeck, Poughkeepsie RDC.[3]

Research Notes

This would make sense of the names and baptisms of their first two daughters, with Annatje named for her maternal grandmother, and sopnsored by her and her husband, and Catharina, named for her paternal grandmother, and sponsored by her and her husband, as seen in the memory. I think Van Kleeck-72 and VanKleeck-11 are probably the same person, as the christening record I've attached to VanKleeck-11 shows. See: https://www.familysearch.org/photos/artifacts/139487422 .

https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/viewer/600870/?offset=&return=1#page=1&viewer=picture&o=&n=0&q=

Sources

  1. Holland Society of New York; New York, New York; Poughkeepsie and The Flats, Book 39: Ancestry.com. U.S., Dutch Reformed Church Records in Selected States, 1639-1989 [database on-line].
  2. "New York, Church Records, 1660-1954," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:2:QRX7-F3T1 : 10 October 2019), Entry for Antonetta Van Kleeck, 30 Sep 1770; citing Birth, New York, British Colonial America, multiple churches, New York, Image: Family Search Film # 007862549, Image 509 of 1404. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSHW-4QFM-D?cc=2787817&personaUrl=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3AQGRL-SJQF
  3. Index: "New York, Church Records, 1660-1954," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QGRL-SJQJ : 10 October 2019), Annatie Duboys in entry for Antonetta Van Kleeck, 30 Sep 1770; citing Birth, New York, British Colonial America, multiple churches, New York. Image: Film # 007862549, Image 509 of 1404, https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSHW-4QFM-D?cc=2787817 .

Acknowledgments

  • WikiTree profile VanKleeck-11 created through the import of Tom Roland Family Tree.ged on May 6, 2012 by Tom Roland. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Tom and others.
  • This person was created through the import of Rodney Timbrook Ancestors and Relatives_2010-09-10.ged on 10 September 2010.




Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
When I merged, I specified that the spelling of the surname should be as in Van Kleeck-72. This is the spelling on her birth record for her father. For some reason, it is now VanKleeck.
posted on VanKleeck-11 (merged) by Sharon Danbrook
Looks like you accidentally switched the name. Accidents happen. :-)

I corrected the LNAB.

posted by Ellen Smith
Van Kleeck-72 and VanKleeck-11 appear to represent the same person because: Clearly the same person.
posted on VanKleeck-11 (merged) by Mark Weinheimer
The marriage here to Peter

http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Van%20Der%20Voort-5 is dubious, and probably just an error. They differ in age by a couple generations.

Edit October 14, 2015: The claimed attached marriage to the much older Peter Van Der Voort is just silly, and conflicts with another much more reasonable marriage of his, so I am going to disconnect. I preserved the name here in case there is another legitimate Peter that she is properly married to of her own generation.

posted on Van Kleeck-72 (merged) by Steven Mix

V  >  Van Kleeck  |  V  >  Van De Bogard  >  Antonetta Barentse (Van Kleeck) Van De Bogard

Categories: New Netherland Descendants 1674-1776 | New Netherland Project-Managed | Palenville Village Cemetery, Palenville, New York