no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elizabeth (Ashton) Dudley (abt. 1525 - bef. 1556)

Elizabeth Dudley formerly Ashton
Born about in Fyfield, Berkshire, Englandmap
Daughter of and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1545 in Fyfield, Berkshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Mother of
Died before before about age 31 in Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 27 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 4,614 times.

Contents

Biography

Miss Ashton was born circa 1525 at Fyfield, Berkshire, England.[1] She married Sir Henry Dudley, son of Sir John Dudley, 3rd Lord Dudley and Cecily Grey, between 1545 and 1550 at of Fyfield, Berkshire, England.[1] She died before November 1556.[1]

Note

Currently no source listed attesting to Miss Ashton's first name being "Elizabeth"

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Douglas Richardson, Plantagenet Ancestry, p. 280.

See also:

Acknowledgements

  • This person was created on 27 March 2011 through the import of fitzmaster032511.ged.
  • This person was created through the import of Jen Tree 5 01(3) - 23042011.ged on 19 May 2011.




Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Elizabeth's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
If Mrs. Ashton Dudley had existed then I would suspect that she would be the grandchild or great grandchild of Christopher Ashton, who married Lady Gordon. If we assume her son, Roger Dudley, got married in 1575 at 20-30 then he was born in 1745-55. Mrs. Ashton Dudley would be 18-20, when she had him, so her birthyear would be 1725-1735. In the culture of the time, a marriage of Henry Dudley to an 16-20yo daughter of his fellow conspirators would make sense; It would seal the alliance. Queen Mary I was about to take the thrown in 1552, so I would suspect at this time. The big questions are:, 1) if Henry was either in prison or in France with Rogers maternal male relatives, then was Roger raised in France or raised in England at the Ashton's place without a father; 2) if his mother died before 1556, so when Roger was very young, then who raised Roger? and 3) why is there no record of this marriage, Dudley was very prominent Knight at the time in England and in France. His marriage would be a big deal.
posted by Bret Bessac PhD
edited by Bret Bessac PhD
Deleted Catherine Gordon as mother. Reported to be step-mother instead.
posted by Jack Wise
Ashton-1848 and Ashton-97 appear to represent the same person because: similar birth, same husband, same death
posted by Robin Lee
Ashton-827 and Ashton-97 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same spouse
Agree with David Land below that Catherine Gordon is not believed to be the biological mother of this person. At least no evidence to that fact has been presented. Suggest severing link
posted by Joe C
wikipedia page for Catherine Gordon states she had no children but was step-mother to two children from Christopher Ashton's previous marriage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Catherine_Gordon

posted by David Land
Ashton-97 and Ashton-143 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse
Ashton-97 and Ashton-143 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse

A  >  Ashton  |  D  >  Dudley  >  Elizabeth (Ashton) Dudley