no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Rebecca (Austin) Corley (1675)

Rebecca Corley formerly Austin
Born in St. Peter's Parish, New Kent, Virginiamap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1694 in Orange CO VAmap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] in Orange, Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Melissa Dyniec private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 23 Dec 2011
This page has been accessed 992 times.

Biography

Rebecca was born in 1675. Rebecca Austin ... She passed away in 1695. [1]

No more info is currently available for Rebecca Austin. Can you add to her biography?

Rebecca was born in 1695. Rebecca Austin ... [2]

Sources

  1. Entered by Tom Coley, Dec 23, 2011
  2. A source for this information is needed.


  • Tom Coley, firsthand knowledge. Click the Changes tab for the details of edits by Tom and others.




Is Rebecca your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Rebecca by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rebecca:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 6

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I have removed Richard Austin and Abigail Bachelor as Rebecca's parents, They are from Massachusetts not Virginia.
Please check death date because he daughter is listed as "Rebecca Corley

Born 1710 in Hanover, Virginia, United States"

Austin-4805 and Austin-1591 appear to represent the same person because: same husband, no sources on either profile for dates. However, with the children shown on -4805, the dates on 1591 seem more in line.
posted by Robin Lee
Appears to be same as Austin-1591
Austin-4805 and Austin-1591 are not ready to be merged because: 4805 needs more matching info before a merge can be done ty Shannon
posted by Shannon Shaw
Austin-4805 and Austin-1591 appear to represent the same person because: These are the same person. I didn't realize a profile existed, and the autosearch didn't come up with one. Sorry for the mix-up.

Rejected matches › Rebecca Austin (aft.1551-)

A  >  Austin  |  C  >  Corley  >  Rebecca (Austin) Corley

Categories: Virginia, Unsourced Profiles