no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Orlando Bagley (abt. 1620 - abt. 1663)

Orlando Bagley
Born about in Manchester, Lancashire, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 6 Mar 1653 in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusettsmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 43 in Boston, Suffolk, Massachusettsmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Al Adams private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 3 Jan 2011
This page has been accessed 4,350 times.

Contents

Multiple Potential Birth/Death dates

  • From many merges, his birth is somewhere between 1620 and 1628. The 1620 date is more likely with an immigration of 1642, which would make him 22.
  • His death is listed as 1663-1670[1]

Biography

ORLANDO BAGLEY, the pioneer ancestor of the Bagley family of Worcester, Massachusetts, was born in England, as near as can be ascertained, between 1624 and 1630. He came to America some time before 1653, as it is recorded that he was married at that time in Salisbury, probably of that part of the town which is now Amesbury, Massachusetts.

He removed to Boston soon afterward, as some of his children were born there. He was made a freeman in 1667, admitted to the church. He married Sarah Colby, the daughter of Anthony Colby — the first Colby to come to America — by whom he had five children, the second child named Orlando.”

Orlando's wife Sarah died in Boston (perhaps from complications from childbirth of her daughter Sarah in 1663). He is believed to have died around 1663 as well. Afterward, their kids ended up in Amesbury where Sarah's family lived at the time; it's possible that Orlando lived long enough to take them there.

Potential Father

James Savage informes us: "BAGLEY, JOHN, wh. had, I suppose, been one of Lyon Gardiner's men at Saybrook in 1637, should be found at Watertown 1643, but Bond in his all embracing vol. has not appoint. him a place there. One John, perhaps a s. was a soldier, and James was ano. of Gallop╒s comp. to Quebec, 1690. ORLANDO, Salisbury, m. 6 Mar. 1654, Sarah, d. of Anthony Colby, had Orlando, b. at Boston, 18 Feb. 1659; and perhaps other ch. ORLANDO, Amesbury, S. prob. of the preced. took o. of fidel. 20 Dec. 1677, freem. 1690, m. 22 Dec. 1681, Sarah Sargent, perhaps d. of William of the same, had Sarah, b. 27 Feb. 1683; John, 21 Jan. 1685; Jacob, 13 Dec. 1687, and Orlando, next day; and Judith, 13 Nov. 1690. SAMUEL, Weymouth, by w. Mary had Samuel, b. 7 Sept. 1658; and perhaps more. SAMUEL, Weymouth, s. of the preced. m. Mary, d. of Shadrach Thayer, of Braintree, had James, bapt. 8 July 1688; Sarah, 17 May 1696; Abigail, 1 Oct. 1699; and Mary, 5 July 1702."[2]

John Bagley was a founding settler of Saye-Brook Colony 1636-1637.[3] Sarah Bagley, the daughter of Orlando I., married John Mack I, and settled in Lyme, which was originally part of the Saybrook Colony and later, more specifically East Saybrook, being on the east side of the Great River. Assuming the Mack farm was in North Lyme, where Mack Creek is found on modern maps, It might not have been the same land as John Bagley lived on because the early Saybrook Colony that lay on the east side of the river was in the southern part of Lyme.[4] But, regardless, if any family lived in Lyme, that might be what attracted them away from Salisbury and Concord and planted them in Lyme. More research is called for.

Sources

  1. Anderson's Great Migration Study Project
  2. A Genealogical Dictionary of The First Settlers of New England, Before 1692, Volume #1, Pgs 92 - 101. Also found here
  3. Saybrook Colony Founders, Old Saybrook Historical Society. History of Old Saybrook.
  4. Map of Connecticut Colony showing the Saybrook Settlement
  • The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England, 1620-1633, Robert Charles Anderson, (New England Historic Genealogical Society), "ii SAR Wikipedia,AH, b. say 1635; m. Salisbury 6 March 1653 Orlando Bagley.
  • Bagley Genealogy", in Perley, Sidney, ed. The Essex Antiquarian. (Salem, Mass.: Essex Antiquarian), Vol V, p. 65, May 1901. "Orlando Bagley. He lived in Boston, 1658-1663; and was subsequently of Salisbury, probably of that part of the town which is now Amesbury. He married Sarah Colby March 6, 1653-4, in Salisbury; and she died in Boston 18: 3: 1663. He probably died soon after." Lists children and descendants. First immigrant of the Bagley family.
  • Wm Sterling of Haverhill, MA & of Lyme, CT & his descendendts
  • Ancestry of Charles Stinson Pillsbury & John Sargent Pillsbury by Mary Lovering Holmanm 1938
  • MA Marriages 1633-1850" (Family History Library, Salt Lake City, Film # 1761394 and 0859998).
  • MA Town and Vital Records 1620-1988 Record.
  • MA Census, 1790-1890
  • Boston Births, Baptisms, Marriages and Deaths 1630-1699". p87.

Research Notes

This Orlando Bagley, the immigrant, wouldn't have been known as Orlando Sr. because he died before his son Orlando reached adulthood. The son Orlando was known as Orlando Sr., after HIS son Orlando reached adulthood.

Also, this Orlando Bagley was no longer alive during the Salem witch trials in the 1690s, so he was not the constable who arrested Susannah Martin. It was his son Orlando Sr.





Is Orlando your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Orlando's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
There is a land record for John Mack. It is either in the Deep River Records or in the Lyme records. I looked at both within a few weeks of each other and can't remember which one had records for John Mack. (I saw it in passing while looking up something else.) It is possible that the John Mack in those records is also not this John Mack.

Just as a note: many of the earliest records are in Deep River (a town now up the river from Old Saybrook) that might otherwise be expected to be found in Old Saybrook.

posted by J Briller
No they are 2 different families.
posted by Al Adams
Are the Bagley’s and Bigelows the same family?
posted by R. Arenz
Replied on G2G
posted by R. Arenz
If Orlando 1 the immigrant died shortly after his wife Sarah Colby about 1663 would it not make more sense that the Orlando who was constable in Amesbury was his son? Because of the lack of strong evidence concerning Orlando 1 - just asking.
Agreed. Hoyt (The Old Families of Salisbury and Amesbury, Massachusetts, Vol. I) said that he found it difficult to obtain proof that Orlando1 lived in Amesbury at all. All of his children (as far as is known) were born in Boston and his wife died there. Orlando2, on the other hand, lived and died in Amesbury and in 1692 Orlando1 would have been a bit old to be constable.
posted by Patrick Griffith

B  >  Bagley  >  Orlando Bagley