Media: Book
Title: One World Tree (sm)
Author: Ancestry.com
Publication: Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, n.d.
Repository: www.ancestry.com
Media: OneWorldTree [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc.
Henning, Elma & Merle Rummel, The Toney Family History, Gateway Press, Inc, 1979, pg 18
Acknowledgements
This profile was auto-generated by David Hughey through the import of MaryHugheyW.ged on May 2014.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
Baker-38119 and Baker-11402 appear to represent the same person because: as has been indicated, the sources for this person exist on Baker-11402 and the two profiles intend to represent the same person, the merge should be approved
Baker-38119 and Baker-11402 do not represent the same person because: There is no actual evidence that Baker 38119 exists. A copied phrase from the Toney Family history might suiffice to make these to women match but at the moment a merge would only serve to attach Elizabeth Calloway Toney to the family of the spouse of Baker 11402.
The issue has nothing to do with parents or data particulars. Findagrave is an UNTRUSTED SOURCE and because it's the ONLY source, there is no actual evidence that Baker-38119 even exists.
How about a quote from the Toney Family History that shows Elizabeth Callaway Toney's siblings or parents. I don't want to legitimize the Toney line by adding to Baker-11402
Yates Publishing Company is not a trusted source.
Family Group sheets are not a trusted source.
Baker-11402 and Baker-38119 do not represent the same person because: The effect of this merge is to add Elizabeth as a daughter of Mary Baker Callaway. The only source to support this idea comes from FindAGrave, which is not a trusted source. To add a child to someone is a very big step and we should make sure it's not a misstep. Please show better evidence for the idea that Elizabeth is the daugther of Mary.
Baker-38119 and Baker-11402 are not ready to be merged because: Where is the evidence that Elizabeth Calloway Toney is the daughter of Mary Baker Callaway. Find-A-Grave is NOT a trusted source. I could make up a find-a-grave 'record' showing that I AM Mary's daughter. Nope. Needs more actual evidence. Without actual evidence this merge would add and daughter and 3 grandchildren to Thomas Calloway (husband of Mary.)
Baker-12557 and Baker-11402 appear to represent the same person because: The fact that the husbands are the same is a real indicator that the Marys are the same
Baker-12557 and Baker-11402 do not represent the same person because: The existence of Baker 11402 is based on the Sons of the American Revolution application of William Paul Graybeal, born 28 Dec 1937.
Baker-12557 and Baker-11402 appear to represent the same person because: Slightly different bio stars but the family is the same. I suggest merging and documenting issues in the bio.
How about a quote from the Toney Family History that shows Elizabeth Callaway Toney's siblings or parents. I don't want to legitimize the Toney line by adding to Baker-11402 Yates Publishing Company is not a trusted source. Family Group sheets are not a trusted source.
edited by Jeanie (Doran) Bond