no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Susannah (Barker) Vermillion (1762 - abt. 1800)

Susannah Vermillion formerly Barker
Born in Charles County, Marylandmap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 16 Mar 1783 in Port Tobacco, Charles, Maryland, United Statesmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 38 in Virginia, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 15 Sep 2015
This page has been accessed 329 times.

Contents

Biography

Marriage

Susannah married Uriah Vermillion on 16 March 1783 in Charles County.[1][2]

Date: 16 Mar 1783
Place: Port Tobacco, Charles, Maryland, United States

Research Notes for last name

Both of these websites, while unsourced, agree that the father was Samuel Baker...thus making her last name at birth more probably Baker.

Sources

  1. Marriage: "Maryland, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1655-1850"
    Ancestry Record 7846 #9557 (accessed 8 May 2022)
    Susannah Barker marriage to Uriah Vermillion on 16 Mar 1783 in Charles County.
  2. Burial: "U.S., Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current"
    Ancestry Record 60525 #12570595 (accessed 8 May 2022)
    Uriah Vermillion burial (died on 31 Oct 1844) in Arabia, Lawrence County, Ohio, United States of America. Find A Grave: Memorial #7303976






Is Susannah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Susannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Susannah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Barker-16261 and Barker-5556 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicates
posted by Laura DeSpain
Barker-6933 and Barker-5556 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate
Baker-18416 and Barker-6112 appear to represent the same person because: same/similar dates and family members
posted by Robin Lee
Barker-4538 and Baker-18416 appear to represent the same person because: Same person though Barker 4538 has more detailed information and more sources.
posted by Nicole Vermillion

B  >  Barker  |  V  >  Vermillion  >  Susannah (Barker) Vermillion