no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Ruth (Barlow) Bradley (abt. 1646 - aft. 1689)

Ruth Bradley formerly Barlow
Born about in Connecticut Colonymap [uncertain]
Wife of — married about 1661 in Fairfield, Connecticut Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 43 in Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut Colonymap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Dorothy Phelps private message [send private message] and Lindsey Bowling private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 1,913 times.

Biography

Genealogist Dale Kellogg in a detailed examination of known primary evidence suggests the year of marriage of John Barlow and Ann __________ is 1627 with Elizabeth as the first child born 1628 and Ruth as the last child born about 1646.[1]


Ruth Barlow was born about 1630 in Connecticut Colony, daughter of John Barlow (abt. 1594–1674) and Ann Unknown (1604–1685).

Her siblings were:
Note: these years of birth are under revision and do not fall within the most recent research.[1]

  1. Elizabeth Barlow (abt. 1622–1686)
  2. Isabella Barlow (abt. 1628–1698)
  3. Anne Barlow (abt. 1631– )
  4. John Barlow (bef. 1631–1691)
  5. Martha Barlow (1632–bef. 1698)
  6. Deborah Barlow (1636–1674)

Ruth (30) married Francis Bradley (35) (born about 1625 in England) in 1661 in Fairfield.[2] Their known children were:

  1. Daniel Bradley (1662–1668)
  2. John Bradley (1664–1703)
  3. Ruth Bradley (1664–aft. 1715)
  4. Joseph Bradley (1664–1668)
  5. Abigail Bradley (1667– )
  6. Francis Bradley (1670–abt. 1716)
  7. Daniel Bradley (1673–bef. 1713)
  8. Joseph Bradley (abt. 1676–abt. 1714)

Ruth died after Oct 1689 in Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut Colony, aged about 58.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Kellogg, Dale, FOGS, An Exercise in Probability, The Children of John Barlow of Fairfield, Connecticut, Connecticut Nutmegger, 25:529 $ubscription (1993)
  2. Marriage: Torrey, Clarence Almon. Torrey’s New England Marriages Prior to 1700 (Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc. Baltimore, 1985) Vol. I, p. 190. BRADLEY, Francis (-1689) & Ruth [BARLOW]; ca 1660/5; Fairfield, CT/Branford, CT/Hartford

See also:





Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Dale Kellogg, FOGS, (Connecticut Nutmegger 25:549 | Subscription link https://www.americanancestors.org/databases/connecticut-nutmegger/image?volumeId=11796&pageName=549) in a detailed examination of known evidence suggests a year of birth for Ann 1630-32; Elizabeth 1628-30; John 1644; Martha 1640; Deborah 1631-32; Isabella 1638-39; Ruth 1645-48. Kellogg concludes the marriage of John Barlow and Ann was about 1627 with Elizabeth as the first child born 1628.
posted by T Stanton

B  >  Barlow  |  B  >  Bradley  >  Ruth (Barlow) Bradley