South Australian Register (Adelaide, SA : 1839 - 1900) Wednesday 15 April 1885 p 4
MARRIAGES
FISK— BATES.— On the 8th April, at the residence of the bride's mother, Currency Creek, by the Rev. C. Hodge, John William Fisk, of Adelaide, to Eva Jane, eldest daughter of the late James W. Bates.
Eva Jane Fisk died in 1908, aged 52.
The Register (Adelaide, SA) Saturday 21 March 1908 p 8
DEATHS
FISK.— On the 20th March, at Third avenue, East Adelaide, Eva Jane, beloved wife of J. W. Fisk, aged 52 years. [3]
Eva Jane Bates was born about 1856, her birth being registered that year in Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia, the daughter of James Watkins Bates and Mary Hopton Edwards. [4]
In 1885, she married John William Fisk.
South Australian Register (Adelaide, SA : 1839 - 1900) Wednesday 15 April 1885 p 4
MARRIAGES
FISK— BATES.— On the 8th April, at the residence of the bride's mother, Currency Creek, by the Rev. C. Hodge, John William Fisk, of Adelaide, to Eva Jane, eldest daughter of the late James W. Bates.
Eva Jane Fisk died in 1908, aged 52.
The Register (Adelaide, SA) Saturday 21 March 1908 p 8
DEATHS
FISK.— On the 20th March, at Third avenue, East Adelaide, Eva Jane, beloved wife of J. W. Fisk, aged 52 years. [5]
Source: S69 Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Name: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.;; Repository: #R3 NOTE This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created.
Repository: R3 Ancestry.com
Source: FirstOne.FTW NOTESource Medium: Other
Is Eva your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Bates-10488 and Bates-6715 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate once death age established. Age and birthplace for the earlier profile was apparently a guess (originally 1850 England) as death hadn't been found, so no match would have been offered during creation of second profile.