I stand by what I have stated - that Isaac Wright (1652-1676), who was attached as father) could not have been the father of this William Thomas Wright b. 1738. Perhaps there is a correct Isaac b. 19 Jan 1684/5 (I haven't found a record) but that is not who was listed here or in many Internet and Ancestry trees.
You are welcome to join Wikitree and add good sourced information to the profile in question.
Hi again - Just wanted to mention that we're mostly all volunteers here & one of the 9 points of our honor code is to be kind (well, actually, it says to be courteous - see IV). Thanks!
Welcome to WikiTree! The initial email from us has helpful links that will get you started on WikiTree, which is not like any genealogy site youve ever used.
WikiTree is different because our goal is to have one profile per person, and that means we all work together as a BIG collaborative team!
Once you volunteer, one of our Greeters will be happy to confirm your membership, and youll be on your way!
Welcome to the family! Were really glad youre here.
I stand by what I have stated - that Isaac Wright (1652-1676), who was attached as father) could not have been the father of this William Thomas Wright b. 1738. Perhaps there is a correct Isaac b. 19 Jan 1684/5 (I haven't found a record) but that is not who was listed here or in many Internet and Ancestry trees.
You are welcome to join Wikitree and add good sourced information to the profile in question.
Welcome to WikiTree! The initial email from us has helpful links that will get you started on WikiTree, which is not like any genealogy site youve ever used.
WikiTree is different because our goal is to have one profile per person, and that means we all work together as a BIG collaborative team!
Once you volunteer, one of our Greeters will be happy to confirm your membership, and youll be on your way!
Welcome to the family! Were really glad youre here.
Liz