The following section of this profile provides detailed information found in the various cited sources. The purpose of this section is to provide the reader access to the information contained within the cited sources; to identify source data conflicts and identify the origin of data errors; and, finally, to provide a platform to analyze, cross-correlate, and comment on important aspects of the cited historical data record.
Vital Records
Primary Source, The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records 1646-1854, New London, Vol 29[1] Barbour New London Vital records for Elizabeth Beebe:
) New London VR; On line Image of the White transcription at Ancestry.com or free Brown Transcription here: Identification of her parents and siblings:
) Samuel Beebe, son of Samuel of New London, married Elizabeth Rogers , daughter of James Sr., 9 Feb 1681/2
) Bathshua, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 16 Mar 1688.
) Elizabeth, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 27 Oct 1684.
) Hannah, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 4 Apr 1695.
) Hopestill, twin with Patience, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 25 Feb 1691/2
) James, son of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 10 Oct, 1701.
) Mary, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 4 May 1686.
) Patience, twin with Hopestill, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 25 Feb 1691/2
) Rebeckah, daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 25 Jan 1689.
) Samuel, son of Samuel and Elizabeth, was born 16 July 1697.
) Samuel, son of Samuel married Ann Lester 21 Nov 1721.
) Elizabeth Newbury , dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Dec. 9, 1709
) Eunice, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Oct. 8, 1726
) Eunice, dau Nathaniel, of New London, m. Jabez BEEBE, son William Jr., of New London, Oct. 11, 1747
) Hannah Newbury, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Nov. 10, 1717
) Hannah Newbury, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. July 8, 1734
) Hannah Newbury, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. July 8, 1735
) Mary Newbury, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Sept. 4, 1715
) Nathan Newbury, son Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Dec. 23, 1721
) Nathaniel Newbury, son Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. May 5, 1707
) Nathaniel Newbury Jr., m. Hannah LESTER, Apr. 4, 1728
) Patience Newbury, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Jan. 29, 1719/20
) Samuel Newbury, son Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. July 9, 1712
) Sarah Newbury, dau Nathaniel & Elizabeth, b. Oct. 15, 1728
Probate Records
Probate for the Estate of Elizabeth (Rogers) Beebe, wife of Samuel:
Primary Source, New York, Wills and Probate Records, 1609-1999[2] Data extract:
) Probate of Elizabeth Beebe Estate; Image 202 of 1284: Samuell Beebe Jr. of Plum Island, in the Province of New York and Nathaniel Newbury {Husband of daughter Elizabeth Beebe}, and John Richards of N. London in the Colony of Connecticut appear before before Judge Christopher Christophers Esq. in the New London, Ct., County probate court and sign an administrative bond for the estate of Elizabeth Beebe on 3 May 1728. Samuel Beebe Junior and Nathaniel Newbury are assigned Administrators for the estate of Elizabeth Beebe, wife of Samuel Beebe, deceased late of New London.
) Probate of Elizabeth Beebe Estate; Image 203 of 1284: Folder Cover Sheet states, Samll Beebee Junr and Nathll Newbury, Adminisftive Bond on ye Estate of their Mothr Elizh Beebee Decd. May 1728---May 3, 1728. {This document is a little curious, Elizabeth (Rogers) Beebe died on 10 Jun 1716, yet the probate for her estate occurs 12 years later and the administrators assigned to her estate are her son and son-in-law, despite the fact that her husband Samuel Beebe, who didn't die until June 1741,is still living. Most likely she received a posthumous inheritance as the result of the death of a relative from the Rogers clan, hence her heirs would be her children. It wasn't her father who died in 1687, who died in 1728 to leave her a posthumous estate? }
) The following definitions and syntax conventions apply to the preceding text of this profile:
) A Primary Source contains data that was recorded by the person in the profile; or by someone known to or with first hand knowledge of that person, during the person's lifetime, death or within two generations thereafter.
) A Secondary Source is a genealogical reference created as the result of a extensive study of available source material and it provides some evidence of the source documentation used to generate the text data.
) A Tertiary Source is a genealogical data source which is a collection of genealogical information that does not cite Primary or Secondary information sources, and the data may be factual or hearsay.
) Braces {Editorial Note Example} are used to insert editorial comments; that is to say, information or clarification that is not contained in the original, cited source material.
) Print: The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records, New London 1646-1854, Vol 29, Compiled by Nancy E. Schott, General Editor Lorriaine Cook White, Genealogical Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD, 2000. Page 24 (In print, available at Amazon.com)
) White transcription online at Ancestry. com (fee reqd): Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection) Ancestry.com online database. White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002. Barbour Collection of New London Vital Records for Beebe; Page 26.
"Connecticut, Vital Records, Prior to 1850," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QPSP-K5VP : 21 September 2019), Elizabeth Beebe, ; citing Birth, , Compiled by Lucius A. and Lucius B. Barbour, housed at State Library, Hartford, Connecticut; FHL microfilm 008272220.
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth: