no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Berry) Foss (abt. 1644 - abt. 1707)

Mary Foss formerly Berry
Born about in New Castle, Rockingham, New Hampshire, British Colonial Americamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1658 in Portsmouth, Rockingham, New Hampshiremap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 63 in Rye, Rockingham, New Hampshire, British Colonial Americamap
Profile last modified | Created 27 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 2,957 times.

Biography

Mary's parents were William Berry and Jane _____.

Mary Berry and John Foss were married before 1660 in Rye, Rockingham, New Hampshire.

Children of John Foss of Rye and Mary Berry

John, a calker, and Mary Berry had at least nine children, possibly 13. The order of the births of these children is different than that given by GDMNH which does not provide their dates of birth (other than estimates for John and Elizabeth).

(Note dates are approximate):

  • 1. John Foss c 1660 – 1752 m 1) Mary 2) Susannah[1]
  • 2. Samuel Foss c 1668 – 1752 m Mary Hinkson[1]
  • 3. Joshua Foss, c 1665 – 1761 m Sarah Wallis[1]
  • 3. Elizabeth Foss, c 1666 – 1746 m Deacon Nathaniel Batchelder[1]
  • 4. Martha FOSS 1670 – 1738 m Richard Goss[1] (of Portsmouth, NH *not* Marbehead)
  • 5. William Foss c 1673 – 1718 m Sarah BUSWELL[1] *only*
  • 6. Hannah Foss 1677 – 1718 m John Jenness[1]
  • 7. Thomas Foss c 1672 – 1710 m Abigail Cole[1]
  • 8. Zachariah FOSS c 1676 – 1752 m Joanna[1]
  • 9. Samuel Foss c 1668 – 1752 m Mary Hinkson[1]

There are other possible children:

  • 1. Richard FOSS c 1681 – 1718 was thought originally to be a child but is now considered to be a grandson per GDMNH, Noyes/Libby/Davis.[1]
  • 2. Hinkson Foss, killed 26 June 1696 is listed as a son in some sources but is probably a grandson via Samuel Foss (above) and his wife Mary *Hinkson*.
  • 3. Walter Foss probably a son.
  • 4. Jane Foss is also possibly also the children of John Foss of Rye but this is far from proven. Jane Foss married Samuel Neal.
Note: John Foss of Rye the caulker (spelled with a double s) did *not* have children named Humphrey, Lydia, Mary nor Jemima. John Fost the attorney and tailor (spelled with a t) of Dover did have children named Humphrey, Lydia, Mary and Jemima. Both John Foss and John Fost had a daughter named Elizabeth and both had a sons named William and Samuel. However, John Fost's Elizabeth m Daniel Dill and Henry Beedle. John Fost's Willaim m 1) Margery Lord, 2) Sarah (Fernside) Heard and 3) MARY (HORNE) Hason. While John Fost's Samuel m 1) Mehitable Lincoln 2) Mary White. So you can easily tell the namesakes apart.
  • Note: she was not married to John Locke.

Genealogy app “We’re Related” shows Mary Berry as an ancestor shared with British musician George Harrison (1943-2001). Harrison would be a 9th cousin.

Sources

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 Sybil Noyes, Charles Libby, and Walter Davis “Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire” Genealogical Publishing Company. Baltimore, Maryland. 1972.
See also--
  • Sybil Noyes, Charles Libby, and Walter Davis “Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire” Genealogical Publishing Company. Baltimore, Maryland. 1972.
  • New England Marriages Prior to 1700 (2015), multiple vols., 1:564; database and digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors; works consulted as "GDMNH 90, 240; Essex Ant. 12:81; Chadbourne 3 correction."
  • Forthcoming
  • Genealogy Dictionary of Maine & New Hampshire




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Berry-16292 and Berry-707 are not ready to be merged because: Needs more research, sourcing.
posted by Laura (Bouchard) Kozin
Berry-16292 and Berry-707 appear to represent the same person because: same approx birth places, same year, same spouse (dupes will need to merge), same death date (within a year) and place. Please merge
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Berry-12118 and Berry-707 appear to represent the same person because: duplicate profile
Berry-9891 and Berry-707 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse and child - Parents to be merged as well
Joe I see you did not agree with my removal of the middle name Elizabeth. Can you tell me where you found documentation of her having a middle name. Thanks Jeanie
Berry-1321 and Berry-707 are not ready to be merged because: Same but different dates and places. Needs research before merging.
posted by Vic Watt
Berry-1321 and Berry-707 appear to represent the same person because: Both listed as wife of John
posted by Ann (Thompson) Johnson

B  >  Berry  |  F  >  Foss  >  Mary (Berry) Foss