no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Ann (Blakely) Brantley (abt. 1626 - 1691)

Ann Brantley formerly Blakely aka Bunn, Phillips
Born about in Isle of Wight, Isle of Wight, Virginiamap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1642 (to before 1647) in Isle Of Wight County, Virginiamap
[children unknown]
Died at about age 65 in Isle of Wight, Virginiamap
Profile last modified | Created 1 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 942 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.

Biography

U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Ann (Blakely) Brantley was a Virginia colonist.

Ann was born about 1626 in Virginia. She married William Brantley and Edward Brantley. She had at least one son with Mr. Brantley. Ann died in Virginia in 1691.

Sources

See also:

  • Source: S58 Author: Ancestry.com Title: Virginia Land, Marriage, and Probate Records, 1639-1850 Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.Original data - Chalkley, Lyman. Chronicles of the Scotch-Irish Settlement in Virginia, 1745-1800. Extracted from the Original Court Records of Augusta County. Baltimore: Genealogical P; Repository: #R2
  • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, "Pedigree Resource File," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:2:3HKT-S22 : accessed 2016-07-04), entry for Mary Elizabeth Bunn Phillips /Blakely/.
  • Find a Grave, database and images (www.findagrave.com/memorial/141372138/anne-brantley) : accessed 27 June 2021, memorial page for Anne Blakely Brantley (1626–Sep 1691), Find a Grave https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/141372138/anne-brantley : Anne Blakely Brantley, Memorial ID 141372138; Maintained by This Is Who We Are: One Big Family (contributor 47309991) Unknown.

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile Blakely-90 created through the import of Harrington _ McLaurin .ged on Aug 1, 2011 by Linda Griffin.
  • Blakely-561 was created by Ron Levi through the import of Levi Brantley Stoll Ancestors Only.ged on Jun 7, 2016.




Is Ann your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Ann's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Dear Profile Managers,

This came up as needing cleanup after the merge. You may wonder why it is still designated as "Unsourced."

The FAG memorial is just a place marker. There is no evidence, such as a will, grave marker, or church record to prove her dates are correct.

Although some Ancestry resources are wonderful, there are also some significant issues. 1. Ancestry has a habit of changing its links, which means that any links you cite as proof will break after a few months. 2. Ancestry Family Trees are not always based on actual facts: birth, death, census records, etc. Many of them just cite other family trees. Also, family members who do not have Ancestry will not be able to see any sources you cite. If you still prefer to use Ancestry, here's a link that might help: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Links_to_Ancestry.

As an alternative, you might want to try FamilySearch.org, which is free and has a wonderful database. You can reach it via RootSearch. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Sources

Respectfully,

Claire ~ WikiTree Data Doctor

posted by Claire (Chapel) Nava
Blakely-561 and Blakely-41 appear to represent the same person because: Appears to be the same person.
posted by Bruce Brantley
Blakely-236 and Blakely-41 are not ready to be merged because: Too much uncertainty as to her various names.
Blakely-236 and Blakely-41 appear to represent the same person because: Please review these potential duplicates.

Thank you.

posted by Philip Smith
Blakely-90 and Blakely-41 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse, location, approximate dates. However, I question the death in Texas. With those dates, I'm sure that is wrong.
Blakely-90 and Blakely-41 do not represent the same person because: Names don't match, dates don't match, there was no Texas then, no woman would have been in that area in the 1600s.

Absolutely no data matches except "unknown" and Isle of Wight.

Blakely-90 and Blakely-41 appear to represent the same person because: Data is the same
posted by [Living Ashby]
Unknown-214621 and Blakely-328 appear to represent the same person because: Nothing conflicts.
Blakely-328 and Blakely-41 appear to represent the same person because: Nothing conflicts - but she was definitely not born in Texas in the 1600s!

Rejected matches › Ann (Unknown) Patstone (abt.1625-)

B  >  Blakely  |  B  >  Brantley  >  Ann (Blakely) Brantley

Categories: Unsourced Profiles | Virginia, Unsourced Profiles | Virginia Colonists