no image

Petrus Botha

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Petrus "Pieter" Botha
Born before in Swellendam, Kaap de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony, VOC (South Africa)
Husband of — married [location unknown]
Husband of — married [location unknown]
Died in Kaap de Goede Hoop, Dutch Cape Colony, VOC (South Africa)
This page has been accessed 239 times.

Categories: The Dutch Cape Colony 1652-1806.

Table Bay, South Africa (1762) Petrus Botha was part of the settlement of the Dutch Cape Colony.
If you are interested in this profile,
please check out the Cape of Good Hope - Kaap de Goede Hoop (1652-1806) Project!




Date: Petrus was born before 1779. Petrus Botha ... [1]
Date: Petrus Botha was born before 1731.[2]



Date: 10 Jun 1731[4]
Referred to as Petrus (Pieter) Botha in the marriage record of his daugther Catharina.


 : Petrus Botha passed away in 1787.[2]


  • WikiTree profile Botha-407 created through the import of My Family.Pretorius.Van_Wyk.DeWaal.Potgieter.2011.ged on Sep 19, 2011 by Judy Potgieter.

  • WikiTree profile Botha-1328 on 26 Dec 13 by Mary Rudd.

  1. First-hand information as remembered by Hennie Snyman, Monday, August 11, 2014. Replace this citation if there is another source.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Entered by Mary Rudd, Thursday, December 26, 2013.
  3. Alta Bekker, Monday, June 2, 2014.
  4. Sep 19, 2011 Judy Potgieter.

More: Family Tree & Genealogy Tools

Searching for someone else?
First: Last:

Do you have a GEDCOM? Login to have every name in your tree searched. It's free (like everything on WikiTree).

No known carriers of Petrus's Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA have taken yDNA or mtDNA tests.

Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? Login to add it.


On February 19, 2015 at 05:49GMT Esmé van der Westhuizen wrote:

Botha-1568 and Botha-407 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse and son

On June 3, 2014 at 18:24GMT Philip van der Walt wrote:

Hi Mary, I merged two profiles of which I think you meant them to be set as unmerged matches. Perhaps Petrus Botha marriage twice (or even more as often was the case in those days). Nevertheless, perhaps you could give more background information on whatever you think the case might be (marriage and baptismal records for example). Sincerely, Philip van der Walt-440

On June 3, 2014 at 04:07GMT Mary Rudd wrote:

Botha-407 and Botha-1328 are not ready to be merged because: Your date of marriage to Catharina does NOT fit with the date of marriage of my Petrus Botha, christened 10 Jun 1731, who married 16 Aug 1772 t0 Anna Catharina van Beulen, christened 4 sep 1746.

Regards, Mary

On June 2, 2014 at 07:04GMT Alta Bekker wrote:

Botha-407 and Botha-1328 appear to represent the same person because: This is the same person

On June 2, 2014 at 06:32GMT Alta Bekker wrote:

Botha-1328 and Botha-1477 appear to represent the same person because: This is the same person

B  >  Botha  >  Petrus Botha