no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jane (Bridgewater) Martin (abt. 1710 - abt. 1778)

Jane Martin formerly Bridgewater
Born about in Williamsburg, James City, Colony of Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Sister of [half]
Wife of — married 1730 in Cumberland, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 68 in Cumberland, Virginia, British Colonial Americamap
Profile last modified | Created 13 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 1,368 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Contents

Biography

Jane Bridgewater was born about 1710 in the Colony of Virginia.[1] She was the daughter of Thomas Bridgewater and Hester.[1]

Jane married Valentine Martin around 1730 in Virginia.[1] Jane and Valentine are said to have had twelve children together.[2]

Jane died in July of 1760 in Cumberland County, Virginia.[2]

Birth

Birth: 1698 Virginia[2]
Alternate Birth: 1710 Colony of Virginia[1]

Family

Husband: Valentine Martin
Wife: Jane Bridgewater
Marriage Date: 1730[1]
Place: Virginia[2]
Children:
  1. Orson Martin - Born: About 1720 - Death: July 1786[2] (On FindAGrave birth is 1735)
  2. Valentine Martin - Born: 1722 - Death: Unknown[2]
  3. Jobe Martin - Born: 1724 - Death: Unknown[2]
  4. Samuel Martin - Born: 1726 - Death: Unknown[2]
  5. Lucy Martin - Born: 20 August 1726 - Death: Unknown[2]
  6. Idom or Isom Martin - Born: 1728 - Death: Unknown[2]
  7. John Martin - Born: About 1731 - Death: 26 January 1821[2]
  8. Esther Martin - Born: 1732 - Death: Unknown[2]
  9. Sarah Martin - Born: 1732 - Death: Unknown[2]
  10. Jane Martin - Born: 1736 - Death: Unknown[2]
  11. Mildred Martin - Born: 1738 - Death 1786[2]
  12. Ann Martin - Born: 1740 - Death: Unknown[2]

Research Notes

  • Jane's profile originally had the birth estimates of 1698 and 1715. If born in 1715 she would have been either age 5 or age 11 when her first child was born. The birth estimate has been changed to 1710 to match Grose until a better source is found. These dates are still in questions as six of her children would have been born before marriage (if you use the dates in this bio, not 1635 and later as found online). The 1698 marriage works better with her children, but then makes her father age 14 when he had her.(Silva-1055 12:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC))

Jane was born about 1715. She passed away in 1778. [3]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Grose, S E. Nelson County Virginia Heritage (Nelson: S E Grose, 2002), p 84.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 "Pedigree Resource File," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:2:SYKK-ZGR
  3. Unsourced family tree handed down to Katie Thies.

Acknowledgments

  • WikiTree profile Bridgewater-33 created through the import of YOUNG.ged on Jul 12, 2011 by Zak Young. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Zak and others.




Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Jane by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Jane:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Bridgewater-335 and Bridgewater-33 appear to represent the same person because: same name, spouse, death
posted by Karen Lowe
Bridgewater-33 and Bridgewater-125 appear to represent the same person because: same person? has different parents, so possibly two people with only one marrying
posted by Whitney Rapp
Bridgewater-131 and Bridgewater-125 appear to represent the same person because: They are the same person. "There should be sources found to verify the dates before merging." This is NOT Wikitree policy: "A merge should be done when two profiles represent the same person." The dates are likely estimates and a source may never be found.
posted by Kerry Larson
Bridgewater-125 and Bridgewater-131 are not ready to be merged because: There should be sources found to verify the dates before merging.
Bridgewater-125 and Bridgewater-131 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse. Born and died in same locations.
posted by Kerry Larson
Bridgewater-70 and Bridgewater-33 appear to represent the same person because: Oops, looks like we have duplicates, please merge.
posted by Phillip Rich
Bridgewater-94 and Bridgewater-33 appear to represent the same person because: Oops, looks like we have duplicates, please merge.
posted by Phillip Rich
Bridgewater-33 and Bridgewater-93 appear to represent the same person because: Oops, looks like we have duplicates, please merge.
posted by Phillip Rich

B  >  Bridgewater  |  M  >  Martin  >  Jane (Bridgewater) Martin

Categories: Estimated Birth Date