"United States Census, 1870," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/M64D-9T3 : 17 October 2014), Lydia M Britt in household of Rolly Britt, Illinois, United States; citing p. 8, family 58, NARA microfilm publication M593 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.); FHL microfilm 545,690.
"United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/MXN7-FPV : 14 July 2016), Lydda M Fields in household of Henry Fields, Belleview, Calhoun, Illinois, United States; citing enumeration district ED 43, sheet 379A, NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 0177; FHL microfilm 1,254,177.
"Illinois Marriages, 1815-1935," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/V2L2-NTH : 29 December 2014), Henry Field and Lydia A. Britt, 15 Oct 1871; citing , Calhoun, Illinois; FHL microfilm 1,305,044.
See also:
"Illinois Births and Christenings, 1824-1940," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/V2L8-Z3H : 12 December 2014), Liddia Margret Britt in entry for Nancy Clementine Fields, 18 Dec 1877; Birth, citing Calhoun, Illinois; FHL microfilm 1305045 IT 3-4.
Paternal relationship is suggested with an AncestryDNA test match between Philip Capobres GEDmatch A880062, Janice Hobson GEDmatch A663300 , and Thomas Anderson GEDmatch A486051 sharing a 32.2 cM on chromosome 19 from 40,627,844 to 58,272,963
Is Lydia your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Lydia by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Lydia:
Parental relationship has been changed from confirmed with DNA to confident because using matching DNA from 2 siblings and a distant cousin is not an approved method of triangulation on WikiTree. See this page that states If a relationship is supported with DNA evidence but cannot be considered confirmed using one of the approved methods use the Confident status instead of Confirmed with DNA.: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Confirmed_with_DNA#Genealogy_Supported_by_DNA_but_not_Confirmed_with_DNA