no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Brooks (abt. 1618 - 1682)

John Brooks
Born about [location unknown]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 25 May 1652 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 64 in Simsbury, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Rosie Blanckenburg private message [send private message] and Rose Clark private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 18 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 938 times.

Biography

He was born about 1618 in Windsor, Hartford County, Connecticut.

John Brooks married Susanna Hanmore.

He died on 03 Sep 1682 in Simsbury, Hartford County, Connecticut.

Sources

  • Ricker, Jacquelyn Ladd. "Ricker Compilation of Vital Records of Early Connecticut. Based on the Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records and other Statistical Sources. (Genealogical Publishing Co. of Baltimore, MD in 2006).




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Family bible records take brooks back to 1650 in Glostonbury Ct
posted by Rose (Brooks) Clark
Brooks-8076 and Brooks-740 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same wife
posted by N Gauthier
Brooks-8076 and Brooks-740 do not represent the same person because: 1618 and 1630-36 are quite aspread, Not known who John's parents or if he had any siblings. he is not related to Thomas. QM242 Haplo group separates John from Thomas.
posted by Rose (Brooks) Clark
Brooks-8076 and Brooks-740 appear to represent the same person because: They appear ro be the same person.
posted by J. (Pearson) Salsbery
No one called John Brooks was born at Windsor CT in 1618. The Pilgrims had not even landed at Plymouth Rock yet. I don't know which, but either the birthplace or else the birth year must be in error.
posted by [Living Winter]

Rejected matches › John Brooks (1636-)

B  >  Brooks  >  John Brooks