Son of Robert 3rd of Clackmannan #James, Bishop of Dunkeld, Chancellor of Scotland.[3]
Robert Bruce, 2nd of Clackmannan died about 1389, when his son succeeded to Clackmannan.[3]
Research Notes
King David II (Bruce) calls Robert, "dilectus consanguineus noster" which translates to "our beloved kinsman". Consiguinous noster translates to our blood, or our cousin. Dilectus equals dear.
King Robert II Stewart also calls him consiguinous.
SP claims that he was born before 1348 but still a minor in 1360 placing his birth after 1338 with an approximate birth of 1343 +/- 5 years.
Property: 1359: charters of Clackmannan (Gartlet) and Rate.[5]
Sources
↑Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org,
p. 467
↑ 2.02.12.22.32.42.5
MacGregor, Gordon, "The Red Book of Scotland", Scotland, private, 2022, Ed. 3, Vol. II, p. 85
↑ 3.03.13.23.3Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org,
p. 468
↑Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org,
p. 469
↑
Received Land at Rait in 1367; Received land from cousin, King David II 09 DEC 1359
Is Robert your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Robert by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
This is the question.
The Broase's are claiming to be Bruce/Bruis.?
I would appreciate it if the Scotland Project could look into this issue, urgently.
The issue is that my dna does not match there dna!
I see only one /BROASE/ in all of WikiTree and that profile is a woman in England with no reference to Scotland or the /BRUCE/ family. Can you elaborate on what you believe to be an issue?
Philip, are you trying to say that the Broase family from France has somehow “merged/changed their name” to fit in to the Bruce family? I could see how that could be done back then!
Yes Scott, impersonating another clan and taking it over by claiming heritage!
If they meant to I don't know, Between Sir Robert Bruce d. 1393 and Sir David Bruce b. 1387 according to the Chambers Encyclopedia, David is very young and the profiles in between these two profiles are caretakers and are not the paternal line.
There can be several reasons why profiles are orphaned, and it's not uncommon to see. The most common reason would be the lack of Pre-1500 certification.
Thanks John, the problem is that there is a whole cluster, Bruce- 390, Bruce- 391, Bruce- 392, Scrimgeour-4 missing profile manager's!
Would suggest removing Bruce- 390, Bruce 391, Scrimgeour-4 as there is no mention of them in the Chambers encyclopedia, Blair writes.
Reference: The Baronage of Scotland, containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Gentry of the Kingdom.
Author: Sir Robert Douglas of Glenbervie.
Date published- Jan 1798.
This source: "Source S00048: 23 Jul 1403 Battle of Shrewsbury; HOAGUE.GED on 22 May 2011. " could use a replacement source. Anyone have time and inclination to do it?
Please do me a favor and change the LNAB from "de Brus" to just "Brus." This is in line with Wikitree's policies and would help me greatly as manager of the Bruce Clan in the Scottish Clans Project. Thanks very much!
This is the question. The Broase's are claiming to be Bruce/Bruis.? I would appreciate it if the Scotland Project could look into this issue, urgently. The issue is that my dna does not match there dna!
edited by Philip Bruce
If they meant to I don't know, Between Sir Robert Bruce d. 1393 and Sir David Bruce b. 1387 according to the Chambers Encyclopedia, David is very young and the profiles in between these two profiles are caretakers and are not the paternal line.
edited by Philip Bruce
This is very odd, there is a whole section here with no profile managers! Can someone please explain what is going on here!
There can be several reasons why profiles are orphaned, and it's not uncommon to see. The most common reason would be the lack of Pre-1500 certification.
Would suggest removing Bruce- 390, Bruce 391, Scrimgeour-4 as there is no mention of them in the Chambers encyclopedia, Blair writes. Reference: The Baronage of Scotland, containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Gentry of the Kingdom. Author: Sir Robert Douglas of Glenbervie. Date published- Jan 1798.
This needs to be fixed, thank you.
Mike