no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Robert (Bruce) Bruce IInd of Clackmannan (abt. 1343 - abt. 1389)

Sir Robert Bruce IInd of Clackmannan formerly Bruce
Born about in Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotlandmap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1370 in Scotlandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 46 in Scotlandmap
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 22 May 2011
This page has been accessed 26,351 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
Preceded by
Thomas (Bruce) Bruce Ist of Clackmannan (abt.1318-bef.1348)
2nd of Clackmannan
bef. 1348 - 1389
Succeeded by
Robert (Bruce) Bruce IIIrd of Clackmannan (abt.1371-1405)

Biography

Notables Project
Robert (Bruce) Bruce IInd of Clackmannan is Notable.
Robert (Bruce) Bruce IInd of Clackmannan is a member of House of Bruce.

Robert Bruce was the son of Thomas Bruce, 1st of Clackmannan, and Marjory Charteris[1][2] born before 1348 at Clackmannanshire, Scotland.

He married Isabelx, daughter of Sir Robert Stewart of Durisdeer and Innermeath.[2][3] They had issue:

  1. Sir Robert Bruce, 3rd of Clackmannan[2][3]
  2. Thomas, of Wester Kennet.[2]
  3. Edward Bruce,[2] Ancestor of Bruce of Airth. named as Alexander, of the next generation in Scots Peerage.[4]
  4. Helen De Bruce[2]

Son of Robert 3rd of Clackmannan #James, Bishop of Dunkeld, Chancellor of Scotland.[3]

Robert Bruce, 2nd of Clackmannan died about 1389, when his son succeeded to Clackmannan.[3]

Research Notes

King David II (Bruce) calls Robert, "dilectus consanguineus noster" which translates to "our beloved kinsman". Consiguinous noster translates to our blood, or our cousin. Dilectus equals dear.
King Robert II Stewart also calls him consiguinous.
SP claims that he was born before 1348 but still a minor in 1360 placing his birth after 1338 with an approximate birth of 1343 +/- 5 years.
Property: 1359: charters of Clackmannan (Gartlet) and Rate.[5]

Sources

  1. Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org, p. 467
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 MacGregor, Gordon, "The Red Book of Scotland", Scotland, private, 2022, Ed. 3, Vol. II, p. 85
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org, p. 468
  4. Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org, p. 469
  5. Received Land at Rait in 1367; Received land from cousin, King David II 09 DEC 1359

See also:





Is Robert your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Robert by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Are the Broase's....Bruce's?

This is the question. The Broase's are claiming to be Bruce/Bruis.? I would appreciate it if the Scotland Project could look into this issue, urgently. The issue is that my dna does not match there dna!

posted by Philip Bruce
edited by Philip Bruce
I see only one /BROASE/ in all of WikiTree and that profile is a woman in England with no reference to Scotland or the /BRUCE/ family. Can you elaborate on what you believe to be an issue?
posted by [Living Anderson]
Philip, are you trying to say that the Broase family from France has somehow “merged/changed their name” to fit in to the Bruce family? I could see how that could be done back then!
Yes Scott, impersonating another clan and taking it over by claiming heritage!

If they meant to I don't know, Between Sir Robert Bruce d. 1393 and Sir David Bruce b. 1387 according to the Chambers Encyclopedia, David is very young and the profiles in between these two profiles are caretakers and are not the paternal line.

posted by Philip Bruce
edited by Philip Bruce
Why is there no profile manager for Bruce-392 ?

This is very odd, there is a whole section here with no profile managers! Can someone please explain what is going on here!

posted by Philip Bruce
Hi Philip.

There can be several reasons why profiles are orphaned, and it's not uncommon to see. The most common reason would be the lack of Pre-1500 certification.

posted by John Vaskie
Thanks John, the problem is that there is a whole cluster, Bruce- 390, Bruce- 391, Bruce- 392, Scrimgeour-4 missing profile manager's!

Would suggest removing Bruce- 390, Bruce 391, Scrimgeour-4 as there is no mention of them in the Chambers encyclopedia, Blair writes. Reference: The Baronage of Scotland, containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Gentry of the Kingdom. Author: Sir Robert Douglas of Glenbervie. Date published- Jan 1798.

This needs to be fixed, thank you.

posted by Philip Bruce
This source: "Source S00048: 23 Jul 1403 Battle of Shrewsbury; HOAGUE.GED on 22 May 2011. " could use a replacement source. Anyone have time and inclination to do it?
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Thought that he died about 1389. Where is evidence that he was hundreds of miles away fighting at Shrewsbury.
posted by Jack Blair
Please do me a favor and change the LNAB from "de Brus" to just "Brus." This is in line with Wikitree's policies and would help me greatly as manager of the Bruce Clan in the Scottish Clans Project. Thanks very much!

Mike

posted by Michael Thomas