no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Martha (Bryant) Burton (1655 - aft. 1691)

Martha Burton formerly Bryant aka Foley
Born in Westmoreland, Stafford, Virginiamap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1671 in Stafford, Virginiamap
Wife of — married 11 Mar 1689 in Stafford, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 36 in Stafford County, Virginiamap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Jun 2013
This page has been accessed 3,207 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Martha (Bryant) Burton is currently protected by the Native Americans Project for reasons described below.
Join: Native Americans Project
Discuss: native_americans
Because of unsubstantiated claims that she was the daughter of a Native American, Wikitree's Native American Project is protecting, tracking and co-managing this profile. Please use the existing G2G thread attached to this profile to discuss evidence of her origins. Thank you.

Contents

Biography

Almost nothing is known of Martha Bryant Foley (Folio) Burton, a woman who lived in Stafford County, Virginia, in the late 1600's.

See Research Notes below for Disputed Origins

Based on the death date of her first husband and the fact that they had four children before 1690 she was probably born about 1660-1665. Her parents, maiden name, birthdate and birthplace are unknown. She married first a man named Thomas Foley (Folio).[1] They were the parents of five children,

  1. Bryant Foley, born ca 1673 in Stafford Co., VA, and married to Mary Jones, ca 1707 in Stafford Co.,
  2. Thomas Foley, born ca 1677,
  3. Anne Foley, born ca 1677, and married to Benjamin Grigsby on September 5, 1726 at St. Pauls, Overwharton Parish, Stafford Co., VA,
  4. John Foley, Sr., born ca 1678 in Stafford Co and died in 1762 in Stafford Co. He married Margaret Mann ca 1708 and Sarah White ca 1744,
  5. Richard Foley, born ca 1685 in Stafford Co and died ca 1726 in Stafford Co.[2]

Thomas died by 1690 [3] and left his property to his children. Before she remarried Martha made sure that the Foley children would receive their inheritance with this pre-nuptial agreement:

This Condicon made ye Second yeare of their Majties Reinge Kinge William & Queen Mary between Martha Folio Widow and Administratrix of her Husband Thomas Folio of ye one party and William Burton of ye other party both of Stafford County Wittnesseth that the said William Burton doth grant & promise with ye said Martha before Matrimony to pay to her Children as they come of age as follweth. To my Sonne Brian Folio one gun sent to his Father out of Englande, one younge Mare, one Cow & Calfe or with Calfe betweene three yeares old & Six, and to be delivered him at Sixteene yeare of age that is to say that if hee lives with us till he is one & twenty to Run on from Sixteen to one & twenty,to my Sonne John one gunne one Mare one Cow & Calfe in ye like manner as his Brother Brian too my Sonne Thomas one Mare, one Cow and Calfe to my sonne Richard one Mare one Cow & Calfe and these my Sonnes to have thier porcons like in my Sonne Brian att Sixteen if they live with us if not till the yeare one & twenty to my Daughter Anne one Mare one Cow & Calfe to be delivered all ye years of Sixteen or married and I ye said William Burton doe binde my self my heirs to ye pformance off all ye premises aboved said as Wittness or handes and Seales ye Fifth day of November 1690.
In presence of us
Richard Brian William Burton
Anne Brian Martha Folio
Recorded in ye County Court of Stafford November 8th 1690[4]

Martha, the "widow and relict of Thomas Foley" married William Burton on 11 Mar 1690 in Stafford Co., VA [5]

Martha appears in no other records found to date. Her death date is unknown.

Research Notes

Marriage: Shaunessy???

Disputed Origins

There is no evidence that her father was the likely non-existent Richard Bryant, nor her mother the equally likely non-existent Keziah Arroyah. This claim was published in 2013 as oral tradition introduced by William "Bill" Deyo, historian of the Patawomeck tribe [6]
"The Bryan(t) family of Stafford County in the mid 1600s and beyond connects to the royal blood of the Patawomeck Indian Tribe through their last chief, Wahanganoche (alias Whipsewasson), nephew of the great chief, Powhatan, father of Pocahontas. The Bryant's and their descendants have multiple lines of descent from Wahanganoche and other members of the Patawomeck Tribe. The first generation of Indian blood included Dr. Richard Bryant, Martha Bryant (wife of Thomas Foley), Thomas Bryant, Silent Bryant, and others. Dr. Richard Bryant's son, also a Dr. Richard Bryant (d. 1749), married Seth Anderson, also of Indian blood of the royal line of the Pamunkey Tribe, who was also his cousin through the Patawomeck's. Since Dr. Richard Bryant Sr.'s wife, Anne (Meese) Redman, was the daughter of Henry Meese [but see note below], whose first wife is also believed to have been a daughter of Chief Wahanganoche, it is no wonder why the Bryant descendants form the greatest number of the current Patawomeck Tribe, officially recognized by the Stafford County Government., married Thomas Foley and left a number of children by him. Some of the Foley descendants intermarried with the Grigsby family, who were likely their cousins of the blood of Wahanganoche. Some branches of the Foley family still carry the tradition of their descent from Pocahontas."

NOTE: Henry Meese arrived in America about 1655, living in Maryland for several years and then crossing over to Virginia about 1660. He had a wife and children but they were all in England. His daughter Anne never came to America. There's a convoluted claim that John Ashton's wife Grace was actually Henry Meese's Indian daughter by Keziah Arroyo because Henry gave their child a gift! Henry kept his property in America, but he returned to England and lived out his life there. [7]

Others have claimed that she was the daughter of Richard Bryant, the man who witnessed her pre-nup, but this is chronologically impossible since they were contemporaries.

Sources

  1. William Burton . . . having Intermarried Martha Folio the widow and relict of Thomas Folio late of this County deceased ", 11th March 160/1, Order Book Abstracts of Stafford County Virginia, 1691-1692, page 4, Pub. By Ruth and Sam Sparacio, McLean, Va., 1987; from the Allen Co., Library, Ft. Wayne, IN
  2. [http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=unicmyth&id=I286 RootsWeb
  3. Marth Folio (Stafford Co. Wills, Administrations, inventories Etc. 1664-1760); Virginia Will Records, indexed by Judith McGhan, Genealogical Pub. Co., Inc., 199
  4. Ruth and Sam Sparacio (compilers), Order Book Abstracts of Stafford County, Virginia, 1664-1668, 1689-1690, McLean, Va., 1987: "Martha Folio the widow and relict of Thomas Folio late of this County deced" dated 9 Sep. 1690. in Stafford County, Virginia Record Book, page 169
  5. Order Book Abstracts of Stafford County Virginia, 1691-1692, page 4, Pub. By Ruth and Sam Sparacio, McLean, Va., 1987; from the Allen Co., Library, Ft. Wayne, IN
  6. William Deyo, formerly at http://www.patawomeckindians.org/patawomecktides2013.pdf (but link no longer works); we cannot find the original that included this quote, but there are several "articles" on the Patawomeck web site by Deyo here.
  7. Jeanne Roberts, Colonel Henry Meease and His Wife blog

See also:





Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Martha by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Martha:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 34

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
it is marked as such in the bio
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Henry Foley is believed to be either Bryant or Richard Foley's son. Bryant and Richard are both sons of Thomas Folio (Foley)'s and Martha Bryant's sons. Therefore, Henry is one of Martha Bryant's grandsons.
posted by Raymond Brown
I also have Henry Foley as a Tobacco Tender in "Name Index to Prince William County People in Colonial Records" between the age of 10 and 16, in 1724 along with Bryan Foley as on the Colonial Master Roll in 1701, James Foley between the age of 10 and 16 as a tobacco tender in 1724. John Foley and Richard Foley are also listed as Tobacco Tenders in 1724.
posted by Raymond Brown
Hello,

I am Ray Brown. My wife is a direct descendant of Henry Foley and she has 43 DNA matches with others related to Henry and 32 DNA matches to Anne Courtney (Henry's first wife). From my research, I believe Henry and Anne had two sons Bartholomew and Luke Foley who moved from Stafford County Virginia to Henry County (now Patrick Co.). I have Henry marrying Anne on 24 December 1738 in "The Overwharton Perish Register". I have Luke Foley taking an "Oath of Allegiance to the state" on p 142 of "The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography" Vol.IX, July 1901, No.1. I need to better tie Luke and Bartholomew to Henry and Anne with documentation.

posted by Raymond Brown
How does Henry connect to Martha?
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Kathie, can you take the repetitious stuff out?
posted by Loretta (Leger) Corbin
Actually Research Notes go just above Sources. If there is a dispute about origins, we summarize that at top to get people's attention when searching, creating or merging.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Yes, but there is so much repetitious stuff on this profile it then appears she has no bio and the basic facts are very difficult to see.
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
You do realize Research Notes are supposed to be before the Bio, right
posted by Loretta (Leger) Corbin
Moved up Biography section so people will see it.
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Added research notes, tweaked formatting, corrected capitalization, so it reads easier.
posted by Loretta (Leger) Corbin
Reordered so she has a bio.
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Done some; now she has no bio about what is actually documented about her; can anyone help fill out, with source citations, what we DO know about her (beyond the prenup)? Thanks!
posted by Jillaine Smith
Can we clean up Martha’s bio? Chronologically she cannot be the daughter of Richard and Ann Bryant - she was their contemporary. She might be related to one of them, but there is no record that says so. The only connection was the pre-nup the Bryants witnessed.
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
I've changed the death date to after 5 Nov 1690. The FAG profile offers no source for the March 1691 death at age 38/39.
posted by Jillaine Smith

B  >  Bryant  |  B  >  Burton  >  Martha (Bryant) Burton

Categories: Native American Adjunct