Ruth was born on December 4, 1681 in Wethersfield, Hartford County, Connecticut.[1] She was the daughter of Henry Buck and Elizabeth Churchill.[2]
She may have resided in Hadley, Hampshire, Massachusetts.
"HENRY BUCK, Wethersfield, married 31 Oct. 1660, Elizabeth d. of Josiah Churchill. They had children: Samuel, b. 1664; Martha, 1667; Elizabeth 1670; Mary, 1673; Sarah, 1678; Ruth, 1681; Mehitable, 1684; and Henry; He d. 7July1712." Savage
Dau of Henry Bucke of Weathersfield, from England, who married 31 oct 1660 Elizabeth Churchill b. 15 May 1642, dau of Josiah Churchill, from England to Weathersfield, who married 1638 Elizabeth Foote, daughter of Nathaniel Foote &wife Elizabeth from England.
↑ "Connecticut, Vital Records, Prior to 1850," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:78XN-HNW2 : 21 September 2019), Ruth Buck, ; citing Birth, , Compiled by Lucius A. and Lucius B. Barbour, housed at State Library, Hartford, Connecticut; FHL microfilm 008272223.
See also:
Gary Boyd Roberts, Ancestors of American Presidents, New England Historic Genealogical Society; Location: Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, USA; 2009. Page 456.
Find a Grave, database and images (www.findagrave.com : accessed 04 May 2020), memorial page for Ruth Buck Smith (4 Dec 1681–Jul 1754), Find A Grave: Memorial #158900701, citing Wethersfield Village Cemetery, Wethersfield, Hartford County, Connecticut, USA ; Maintained by Mookie (contributor 47515129) .
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:
Bucke-33 and Buck-46 appear to represent the same person because: Same husband and birth year of 1656 is way to early for her children's birth years. Please merge Bucke-33 into Buck-46 and select the 1681 birth year as correct. Thank you!
Buck-469 and Buck-46 appear to represent the same person because: Same name and same husband. The main difference is the birth estimates. 1675 is probably a good estimate for her birth year, since her husband was born in 1673, and her mother was born about 1646.