no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Ruth (Buck) Smith (1681 - abt. 1754)

Ruth Smith formerly Buck
Born in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married about 14 Mar 1700 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 72 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticutmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Emily Holmberg private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 958 times.

Biography

Ruth was born on December 4, 1681 in Wethersfield, Hartford County, Connecticut.[1] She was the daughter of Henry Buck and Elizabeth Churchill.[2]

She may have resided in Hadley, Hampshire, Massachusetts.

"HENRY BUCK, Wethersfield, married 31 Oct. 1660, Elizabeth d. of Josiah Churchill. They had children: Samuel, b. 1664; Martha, 1667; Elizabeth 1670; Mary, 1673; Sarah, 1678; Ruth, 1681; Mehitable, 1684; and Henry; He d. 7July1712." Savage

Dau of Henry Bucke of Weathersfield, from England, who married 31 oct 1660 Elizabeth Churchill b. 15 May 1642, dau of Josiah Churchill, from England to Weathersfield, who married 1638 Elizabeth Foote, daughter of Nathaniel Foote &wife Elizabeth from England.

Sources

  1. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7WR-K77 : 7 January 2020), Ruth Buck, 1681.
  2. "Connecticut, Vital Records, Prior to 1850," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:78XN-HNW2 : 21 September 2019), Ruth Buck, ; citing Birth, , Compiled by Lucius A. and Lucius B. Barbour, housed at State Library, Hartford, Connecticut; FHL microfilm 008272223.

See also:





Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Bucke-33 and Buck-46 appear to represent the same person because: Same husband and birth year of 1656 is way to early for her children's birth years. Please merge Bucke-33 into Buck-46 and select the 1681 birth year as correct. Thank you!
posted by Kitty (Cooper) Smith
Buck-469 and Buck-46 appear to represent the same person because: Same name and same husband. The main difference is the birth estimates. 1675 is probably a good estimate for her birth year, since her husband was born in 1673, and her mother was born about 1646.
posted by Carole Partridge

B  >  Buck  |  S  >  Smith  >  Ruth (Buck) Smith