no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Samuel Burgess (1645 - abt. 1714)

Samuel Burgess
Born in Wilmslow, Cheshire, Englandmap
Son of and [mother unknown]
Husband of — married 1 Feb 1672 in Wilmslow, Cheshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 69 in Falls Township, Bucks, Pennsylvaniamap
Profile last modified | Created 25 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 2,614 times.
William Penn
Samuel Burgess was a part of William Penn's Pennsylvania Settlers community.
Join: William Penn and Early Pennsylvania Settlers Project
Discuss: penn

Contents

Biography

Samuel was a Friend (Quaker)

Samuel and Eleanor Burgess came from England in 1685 and settled in Falls township, Pennsylvania.[1]

Birth and Marriage Records. Parish records from Wilmslow in Cheshire, England, indexed by familysearch in 2018, show the marriage of Samuell Burgess to Ellen Peeirs 1 Feb 1671/2, “both of this parish”[2] The birth records for Samuel and his wife Eleanor (as Samuel referred to her in his Will) or Ellen (as in the Falls Meeting records for the birth of their daughters) are also in the Wilmslow records. Samuell Burges was christened 22 Oct 1645. His father was Edward Burges.[3] Ellen Peeirs was christened 11 Nov 1655. Her father was Humfrey Peeires.[4]

Children[1]

Samuel passed away in 1714. His Will, made in Oct 1713, mentions wife Eleanor, sons Joseph, Samuel, John and Daniel, and daughters Priscilla and Sarah. Proven 21 Aug 1714.[1][7]

1685 Deed, Bucks County

Deed: John Rowland and Thos Rowland to Samuel Burgess, 1685: Bucks County- File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by Robert Derber. bob@@derber.com USGENWEB NOTICE: In keeping with our policy of providing free information on the Internet, data may be freely used by non-commercial entities, as long as this message remains on a ll copied material. These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any form at for profit or presentation by other organizations.

SAMUEL & ELEANOR _____ BURGESS BUCKS CO., PA, DEED BOOK A-1, PP. 10-11.

Deed: John Rowland and Thos Rowland to Samuel Burgess, 1685. This Indenture Made the first day o f the Tenth Month 1685 being the first year of King James the Second his reign over England etc and the fifth year of the Proprietarys Government Between John Rowland and Thomas Rowland his brother both of the County of Bucks in th e Province of Pennsylvania of the one party and Samuel Burgess of the said C ounty and Province on the other part Witnesseth that the said John and Thomas Rowland for and in consideration of Ten pounds fifteen shillings the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged where with the said John and Thomas Rowlan d acknowledgeth themselves fully satisfied and contented and thereof clearly acquiteteth and dischargeth the said Samuel Burges his heirs executors and ad ministrators they the said Jon and Thomas Rowland hath granted bargained and sold and by these presents doth grant bargain and sell unto the said Samuel Burges his heirs and assigns A certain tract of land lying in the County of Bucks as aforesaid now in the occupancy of the said Samuel Burgess being bounded on the Northerly side with land of James Hill on the Easterly side with the great Timber Swamp on the Southerly side with piece of vacant land and the l and of Randle Blackshaw being two hundred acres or there abouts Which said tract of land was part of a parcel of land granted and confirmed by James Claypoole and Robert Turner Commissioners for granting of lands within the Province aforesaid by William Penn Proprietary and Governor of the said Province u nto the said John and Thomas Rowland and their heirs by these Letters Patents dated the thirteenth day of the Seventh Month one thousand six hundred and eighty five and all the estate right title interest and property of them the said John and Thomas Rowland of in and to the said tract of land To Have and T o Hold the said two hundred acres or there abouts with their appurtenances un to the said Samuel Burgess his heirs and assigns forever to the only use and behoof of the said Samuel Burges his heirs and assigns forever Yielding and paying to the said John and Thomas Rowland their heirs or assigns at or upon t he first day of the first Month in every year two English Silver shillings or the value thereof in corn current.

In Witness whereof the said John and Thomas Rowland have hereunto put their hands and seals the day and year first above written.

John Rowland Tho Rowland
Sealed and Delivered in the presence of
Jonathan Scaife Richard Ridgway Phinehas Pemberton

The above Conveyance was by the within named John and Thomas Rowland delivered and acknowledged in open Court in the County of Bucks unto the within named Samuel Burges the 6th of 10th Month 1685. Certified under the Clerks hand and County seal.

Phinehas Pemberton Cleric Comit
Recorded in the office of Rolls the tenth day of the 12th Mo. 1685 per
David David Deputy

Colonial Society, BUCKS CO. COURTS, pp. 30-1 documents the minutes of the Court concerning the delivery of this deed on "the 9th day of the 10th month, 1685," as follows :

This day was deld & acknowledged in open Court by Jon & Thomas Rowland unto Samuel Burges one deede of a Certaine tract of Land being about 200 ackers lying betwixt Randulph Blackshaw & the great timb

Research Notes

Quality research regarding the Burgess family of Maryland (NOT this Samuel Burgess, but Burgess family from Wiltshire) may be found here: http://fzsaunders.com/burgesseng.html (additional notes regarding the probable errors in WikiTree from Fred Saunders are available from T Stanton on request.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Davis, William H. "http://pagenweb.org/~bucks/BIOS_DAVIS/burgesfamily.html." History of Bucks County, Pa Volume 3: Bucks County PA Gen Web. Accessed 16 September 2018 [[Baty-260|SJ Baty].
  2. "England, Cheshire Bishop's Transcripts, 1598-1900," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NHN6-W4L : 12 February 2018), Samuell Burges Marriage Date 01 Feb 1671 Marriage Place Wilmslow, Cheshire, England Spouse's Name Ellen Peeirs (with Feb the 11th month of 1671), "both of this parish". Note: The image shows the date in sequence with other baptisms, burials and marriages in the hand written transcript, 1671 is not a typo.
  3. "England, Cheshire Parish Registers, 1538-2000," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7G5-NXT : 7 December 2017), Samuell Burges, 22 Oct 1645, Christening; citing p 311, , Wilmslow, Cheshire, England. Name of father: Edward Burges.
  4. "England, Cheshire Parish Registers, 1538-2000," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7GK-H54 : 7 December 2017), Elen Peeirs, 11 Nov 1655, Christening; Wilmslow, Cheshire, England Father's Name Humfrey Peeires.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Swarthmore College; Swarthmore, Pennsylvania; Falls Copy Births, Deaths and Marriages; Collection: Quaker Meeting Records; Call Number: RG2/Ph/F35 3.1 https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=2189&h=156031.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Hinshaw, Wm Wade, et al, Encyclopedia of American Quaker Genealogy, II:956
  7. "Pennsylvania Probate Records, 1683-1994", FamilySearch (Online: Intellectual Reserve, Inc., 2014), [Original source: Bucks County Register of Wills, "Wills v. 1-2 1713-1759", DGS 5534503, (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1958, 1973), pp. 9-11]

See also:

  • "The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography", Google Books (Online: Google, Inc., 2005), [Originally published: White, Jr., Miles, "Thomas Janney, Provincial Councillor", The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, (Philadelphia: Historical Society of Pennsylvania, 1903), p. 225]

Acknowledgements

  • This person was created through the import of Tribal Pages 0004.ged on 25 March 2011.
  • This person was created through the import of Holmes.ged on 20 May 2011.
  • WikiTree profile Burgess-1720 created through the import of WILLIAMS 2011.GED on Jun 22, 2011 by Ted Williams.
  • WikiTree profile Burgess-1773 created through the import of Rhodes 2011_2011-07-09_01_01.ged on Jul 9, 2011 by Tom Rhodes.
  • Thank you to Caroline Cohoe for creating WikiTree profile Burgess-2840 through the import of cohoe only_2013-04-15.ged on Apr 15, 2013.




Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Samuel's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 23

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Burgess-2840 and Burgess-1441 appear to represent the same person because: I have added the birth and marriage records for Samuel to Burgess-1441. Please merge Burgess-2840 into his profile. You can simply ignore the current Bio. for 2840. If you add me to the trusted list, I can do it leaving the bio on 1441 unchanged for you to review later.

(Reconciliation of his 'wives' can be done later too)

posted by Joan (Gardner) Moore
I have found the birth and marriage records for Samuel Burgess (1645 son of Edward) and Eleanor (Ellen) Peers (1655, daughter of Humphrey) and their marriage in 1671/2. They are all in Wilmslow, Cheshire. I have so far put them on the profile of Eleanor Peers-69 and the other Samuel Burgess-2840 which needs to be merged into this profile.

Therefore I have removed from this profile Uncertain father Daniel Burgess-1100 and Uncertain mother Catherine Unknown-335237.

This disconnects Samuel as the brother of Daniel Burgess-33687 born in Staines, son of Daniel and Catherine Burgess

posted by Joan (Gardner) Moore
edited by Joan (Gardner) Moore
Thanks, Joan. I'm swamped cleaning up another family and have not yet had time to look at any of this but very much appreciate the details in the Comments.
posted by T Stanton
I have not digested all that you have found though Wilmslow is not at all a surprise. What do you make of the extreme gap between marriage and what is seen as the first birth of a child?
posted by T Stanton
It has only been assumed that all 6 children were born in Pennsylvania. And no records or even firm ages have been found for any of the sons. If their births are not in the Falls Meeting records, then they are probably somewhere in England and probably in some Quaker records. I have checked Wilmslow and they are not in church records there. Samuel was 9 when his father died. I think I have found his oldest brother Jeffrey in Wilmslow records. But there was probably very little to keep Samuel (7th child, 5th son with no record of childhood deaths) in Wilmslow after he was married.

Found the wife of son Samuel on Wikitree Ann (Snowden) Burgis Barracliff born 1682 ! If Samuel was older ...

posted by Joan (Gardner) Moore
edited by Joan (Gardner) Moore
If you are looking at the microfilm records via Ancestry (which I assume are the ones seen elsewhere as well), there are quite a number of the rolls where the start/end plates (and even images of minutes original or duplicate covers) have wrong content and wrong dates, dates incorrect sometimes by over a decade. I found this to be true in several of the Cheshire (and I think Westmoreland) meetings so what I did was look at various rolls both before and after the one where things should be found but were not. I found a lot of additional relevant minutes that way but it took a lot of time (and eye strain).
posted by T Stanton
Quaker records for daughter Priscilla list wife Eleanor as Ellin. There are corresponding birth and marriage records for Ellin in Wilmslow see Peers-69 for sources and summary of the current state of the family on Wikitree.
posted by Joan (Gardner) Moore
I am a direct descendent of Samuel Burges. Several years ago I spent weeks in archives in England — the Cheshire Records Office, the National Archives at Kew, the library at Manchester University. At one point I examined EVERY Burges/Burgess will in the Cheshire archives. They also have records from the Society of Friends going back to the founding days.

My records from those days were stored on floppy disks. (!!!) In the intervening years I became busy with life and am only now trying to exhume the data I amassed. Here are a few tidbits that may be of interest.

Samuel was christened in the Wilmslow parish Church of St Bartholomew's on 22 October 1645. He was the seventh child of Edward Burges, of Styal, a hamlet of Pownall Fee in Cheshire.  I have not been able to find the name of his mother.   Not all of his family joined the Society of Friends. Some remained with the Church of England, were very active in the parish and are buried in the churchyard at Wilmslow.

Samuel was one of several siblings who came to America with the Quakers. His brother Isaac also came. The Pennsylvania archives has records of a lawsuit between Samuel and Isaac.    Samuel's brother Peter remained in England. Peter's daughter married Randal Blackshaw who also settled in the Falls Meeting. There are many references of Samuel and Randal in the early Quaker records of Bucks County.

I was surprised to find the kinship between Samuel and Randal. I read a letter from Mary, (Peter Burges’s widow), in the files of a Cheshire lawyer authorizing Samuel "my brother-in-law" to collect money from Randal "my son-in-law."  That was a true “light bulb” moment. Randal was much older than his wife, and finding he was kin answered questions about how and why Peter Burges was involved with the Blackshaw estate in England.  

When it comes to Samuel's grandparents I hit a brick wall. I cannot find the actual birth or marriage information for Edward Burges, although I have not given up yet. I extracted every existing will available in the Cheshire Records office for the years 1500 - 1680 -- it took me weeks. It provided me with many leads, but no solid links  

It is sobering to read the original "Sufferings of the Quakers" documents in the archives at the Cheshire Records Office in Chester. (This material is not included in the extant "Sufferings of the Quakers" that are published.)  The Quaker meetings kept detailed records of every action taken against them in the early years. The earliest records contain stories of arrests with long (many, many miles) forced walks to prison.

Samuel's uncles were imprisoned. The Quaker record keeper describes how the families had to take food to the prison to pass to the prisoners inside, and describes how the jail had no heating and no proper facilities. Many, especially the elderly, died. Some friends and family members who made the trip to bring provisions were themselves thrown in prison. Harsh times.   I will add more facts as I am able.  

posted by Margery Wilson
edited by Margery Wilson
Hi Margery and thank you for adding this valuable information. There is a considerable range of thought on the birth year of Samuel and you have found a birth record. Is there information which conclusively shows that birth record as this man or a process of elimination points to that? If he was born 1645, is there an earlier first marriage and/or additional children in the registers/minute books? There have been significant dating issues with Eleanor as I am sure you know. Do you recall if anything in the data showed the relationship with Joan who is sometimes seen as daughter while others think a younger sister? I've been examining Joan via the records in Mercer Museum which has so far essentially disproved the commonly seen information that she inherited a legacy in England but has not yet shed any definitive light on the familial relationships.
posted by T Stanton
Children of Edward Burges baptized at St Bartholomew's parish church, Wilmslow:

1. Mary Burges, bap. ‪3 Oct‬ 1630

2. Jeffrey Burges  bap. ‪1 Nov‬ 1635

3. Allis Burges, bap. ‪1 Jan‬ 1638/9  Allis is sometimes hypothesized to be the wife of Randal Blackshaw, but my research has proven otherwise. Peter’s (Samuel’s brother) wife, Mary, in a legal correspondance, refers to Randal Blackshaw her "son in law" (not her niece’s husband) and names Samuel Burges as "my brother in law"

So Blackshaw’s wife is Samuel Burges’s niece, the daughter of his brother Peter, and not his sister. At this point in time I do not have a list of Peter’s offspring at hand.

4. Isaac Burges, bap. ‪26 Sep‬ 1641

5. Joseph Burges, of Styall in Pownall Fee, bap. ‪26 Sep‬ 1641,

6. Jonn. Burges, bap. ‪15 Oct‬ 1643

7. Samuel Burges, bap. ‪22 Oct‬ 1645

8. Peter Burges bap. 4 July 1647,

9. Sarah Burges, bap. 9 June 1650

10. Daniel Burges, bap. ‪28 Sep‬ 1651

I spent weeks in the Cheshire Records Office. Their holdings of primary materials is vast. One begins to feel the 1600’s are recent when immersed in parish registers, court proceedings, wills, personal correspondance, etc. The accumulation of primary source material leaves me no uncertainty that this is “our” Samuel Burges.

(Once this Covid pandemic abates to allow international travel, I encourage anyone with interest in Samuel Burges or other Cheshire families to make a visit to the Cheshire Records Office. Spend a week, at least. )

As for the debate over Samuel’s wife I have no information. He mentions “Eleanor” in his will. But, I found no indication in the data I collected to find “Ellin,” prove Eleanor’s genealogy or for a previous marriage.

I have no information on children born to Samuel in England.

I have no information at this time to add regarding Joan Moon. I think the subject would be one of interest to take up in archives in England.

posted by Margery Wilson
I believe he was in the local government October 14 1712 , the Pennsylvania Assembly representing Bucks County
posted by JD Burgess
Samuel Burges Jr served in the Pennsylvania Assembly. He was married to Ann Snowdon. He died in 1716 —only a couple of years after his father. His will and probate records are on the internet.
posted by Margery Wilson
A DNA study has different patents for Samuel. Location matches the marriage location for Samuel and Eleanor... http://www.burgessdna.com/Genealogies/showmedia.php?mediaID=1304

And appears to be same Samuel christened in 1645: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7G5-NXT

posted by Jana Shea
This is one of the theories over the years. Is there sufficient evidence in this DNA study with the right people of proven descent tested to make the actual claim? I don't know and I am not sure where on this site the underlying test information is found. There is also the issue of the age of Ellen/Eleanor at the birth of her documented youngest child in 1701. If she had been age 20 at marriage in 1671 (using that marriage record), which is young for the period, then she is giving birth at age 50 (rare). The current Peers profile gives her birth as 1662 which would have her marrying at the age of 9 in 1671 (if using that marriage record). If there was a marriage in 1671 then there would undoubtedly by children born in England but no record of them has been found (of which I am aware). The date issues seem to strain what is being stated by this DNA study.
posted by T Stanton
Burgess-1441 and Burgess-2949 appear to represent the same person because: Death date and location same.
posted on Burgess-2949 (merged) by Jana Shea
Adopted profile to facilitate merge. The Peers maiden name for Ellen/Eleanor is, I belive, nowhere documented. The 1662 birth, while it should be England, is a better estimate (than 1623) but still lacks documentation.
posted on Burgess-2949 (merged) by T Stanton
@ Rick - the House of Burgess website looks spot on; I'm looking at some 19th century books and other references and they match the info he has. The wife and all of her children don't match - this family group seems to be a hodge podge of linked profiles that shouldn't be.
posted by SJ Baty
SJ, just a heads up here. I am working with the Mercer Museum and Library of the Bucks Historical Society on Joan (Burgess) Moon attached here as daughter. This has already shown through documents including Samuel's will that Joan is not his offspring. It has not yet been proven that Samuel is the brother of Joan but this has long been suspected by earlier researchers. Research is ongoing. Can you add me to the TL for this profile? The sister Joan should be brought under the Penn project, I believe, and the PM on the profile has not been active for three years.
posted by T Stanton
I have detached Joan as daughter with a notice on her profile. At present, this profile is largely unsourced.
posted by T Stanton
Wife is questionable - her date of birth is impossible with the children's dates.
posted by SJ Baty
Birth location is probably wrong, he was probably born in England as Bucks wasn't yet settled except for Swedish.
posted on Burgess-2949 (merged) by SJ Baty
Burgess-3681 and Burgess-1441 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, wife, death date/place. On the birth year, unless someone has something more solid, I would suggest picking one and marking it as "about." Alternatively, you could split the difference and use "about 1626."
posted by Fred Remus III