no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Nathaniel Burgess (1729 - 1798)

Nathaniel (Nathan) Burgess
Born in Little Compton, Newport, Rhode Islandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 19 Dec 1748 in Duxbury, Plymouth, Massachusettsmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 68 in Plymouth, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Carolyn Caflisch private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 31 May 2010
This page has been accessed 810 times.

Biography

Nathan was born in 1729. Nathan Burgess ... He passed away in 1798.

Probate

Nathaniel Burges of Plymouth, yeoman died intestate and on 13 February 1798, Jacob Burges of Duxbury was granted the administration of his estate.[1]

Sources

  1. "Massachusetts, Plymouth County, Probate Records, 1633-1967," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L97D-VH3Q : 20 May 2014), Probate records 1793-1804 vol 34-35 > image 88 of 545; State Archives, Boston.
  • Little Compton Families: From records compiled by Benjamin Franklin Wilbour (Baltimore, Maryland: Clearfield Company: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1997) Fifth edition, Vol. I, p. 132.
  • Vital Records of Duxbury Massachusetts to the year 1850, (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1911), p. 228 (marriage); 357 (death)
  • Vital Records of Duxbury Massachusetts to the year 1850, (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1911), p. 357 (death and cemetery)




Is Nathan your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Nathan by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Nathan:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Burgess-5311 and Burgess-537 appear to represent the same person because: same person
Burgess-5366 and Burgess-537 appear to represent the same person because: same vitals, spouse
posted by Debra (Downs) Allison

B  >  Burgess  >  Nathaniel Burgess