Nathan was born in 1729. Nathan Burgess ... He passed away in 1798.
Probate
Nathaniel Burges of Plymouth, yeoman died intestate and on 13 February 1798, Jacob Burges of Duxbury was granted the administration of his estate.[1]
Sources
↑ "Massachusetts, Plymouth County, Probate Records, 1633-1967," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L97D-VH3Q : 20 May 2014), Probate records 1793-1804 vol 34-35 > image 88 of 545; State Archives, Boston.
Little Compton Families: From records compiled by Benjamin Franklin Wilbour (Baltimore, Maryland: Clearfield Company: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1997) Fifth edition, Vol. I, p. 132.
Vital Records of Duxbury Massachusetts to the year 1850, (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1911), p. 228 (marriage); 357 (death)
Vital Records of Duxbury Massachusetts to the year 1850, (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1911), p. 357 (death and cemetery)
Is Nathan your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Nathan by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Nathan: