Research notes: profile data as originally imported showed a birth date of 2 May, evidently taken from an Ancestry tree, but Yarmouth VR (NEHGS, [1]) show 20 May.
It is possible that Hannah Burgess is the Hannah who married Thomas Harlock (II) by 1719 (birth of their first child), but further research is required to make this case. A claim that she was widowed before 1727 and married, second, Richard Arey, Jr., about that year, is doubtful, as Banks indicates that she had a daughter with Thomas -- Mary (Harlock) Coffin -- in 1727, and another daughter with him -- Patience (Harlock) Norris -- in about 1730; she is also reported (by Banks) as living, as Thomas's widow, in 1748.
Date corrected per Yarmouth Vital Records: Massachusetts: Vital Records, 1621-1850 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2016), [2]
Prior to import, this record was last changed 01:00:00 23 Apr 2012.
Sources
↑ Source: #S12 Data: Text: Ancestry.com. One World Tree (sm) [database online]. Provo, UT: MyFamily.com, Inc.
↑ Source: #S12 Data: Text: Ancestry.com. One World Tree (sm) [database online]. Provo, UT: MyFamily.com, Inc.
Source: S12 Repository: #REPO1 Title: OneWorldTree Note: OneWorldTree, OneWorldTree, Source Medium: Ancestry.com CONT . Data: Text: Ancestry.com. One World Tree (sm) [database online]. Provo, UT: MyFamily.com, Inc.
Repository: REPO1 Name: www.ancestry.com
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah: