The spelling "Burk" appears to be the most correct form for James Burk, since both his 1783 will and 1730 Quaker marriage records spelled it "Burk."
1751 August 19: James Burk took William Brookshire to court for debt. Brookshire "II" had or would become the husband of Honora Burk, his daughter.[5]
Honoura Burk was born estimated ~1733 and possibly died between 1775 – November 1782. Her name may be Honora or Honour. She must be dead by the time of her father's will, which does not mention her, but does mention "my son-in-law, William Brookshire.[6]
Source: S620 Author: Elke Hamm Ailenofe Title: Ancestors of Jeffery Junior Hamm and Brothers Abbreviation: Ancestors of Jeffery Junior Hamm and Brothers Publication: [1] Italicized: Y Paranthetical: Y
Will and Estate of James Burk of Surry Co. NC Feb. 1783 -- "I leave unto my son-in-law, William Brookshire, the sum of ten pounds good and lawful money as in old times."
WikiTree profile Burk-185 created through the import of 60a.GED on Jan 11, 2012 by Michael Lechner.
Thank you to Ed Burke for creating WikiTree profile Burk-288 through the import of Burke Brooks Tree 2010.ged on Feb 18, 2013.
WikiTree profile Burk-213 created through the import of AMYFAMILYTREE_2012-05-17.ged on May 18, 2012 by Amy Bazar.
Thank you to Scott Ledbetter for creating WikiTree profile Burk-352 through the import of Ledbetter01.ged on Jun 8, 2013.
Is Honora your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Honora by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Honora:
Burke-3987 and Burk-185 are not ready to be merged because: They may be the same but too much discrepancy in sources or lack thereof to determine correct dates and names.
Burk-1031 and Burk-185 appear to represent the same person because: intended to be the same person. There is a lot of confusion around her name due to a lack of sources. But, clearly, per the research notes provided on Burk-185, these profiles were intended to represent the same woman and should be merged.
Burke-3987 and Burk-185 appear to represent the same person because: intended to be the same person. There is a lot of confusion around her name due to a lack of sources. But, clearly, per the research notes provided on Burk-185, these profiles were intended to represent the same woman and should be merged.