↑[1]: Thomas in entry for Thomas Clarke, 1664. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
↑[2]: Thomas Clarke in entry for John Clarke, 1666. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
↑[3]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Elizabeth Clarke, 20 Feb 1668; citing Birth, Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007010724. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch.
↑[4]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Mary Clarke, 1669. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
↑[5]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Georg Clarke, 1672. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
↑[6]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Nathaniell Clarke, 05 Nov 1674; citing Birth, Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007010724. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch.
↑[7]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Samuell Clarke, 1677. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
Essex County, MA: Probate File Papers, 1638-1881.Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2014. (From records supplied by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Archives.) Case 5523: Nuncupative Will
Essex County, MA: Probate File Papers, 1638-1881.Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2014. (From records supplied by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Archives.) Case 5528: Inventory
Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Not sure if "Sergeant" is accurate for this profile. Anderson concludes: "...So this Thomas followed in his father's footsteps, being both tanner and sergeant" (Anderson, GMB Vol. 2 pg 96) The Thomas's indicated in the quote both tanners. This profile, for the Thomas Clark Jr to Thomas Clark the carpenter/cooper, was referred to as "tailor."
I believe it is indicated in the Anderson version, that the Noyes, Libby, and Davis account was inaccurate in it's use of "sergeant" for the son of Thomas the carpenter. The determination that the sergeant was the tanner was based on the death of Rebecca Clark, wife of Thomas Jr. tanner. She was called "Rebecca Clark, widow of Sergeant Thomas" at her death.
I am doing some close examination on this family. I think that both sources I referenced above (which are both secondary) are correct and incorrect in various places, and I'm trying to sort that all out. Happy to talk more, but do think at any rate it would be appropriate for the use of "tailor" instead of "sergeant" to describe this profile.
How do we know children Nathaniel and Samuel are not sons to Thomas Clark, Jr., tanner, instead of Thomas Clark, Jr., tailor? Anderson in his discussion of Thomas Jr., tanner, associates the names Nathaniel and Samuel with the Thomas tanner descendants as opposed to the Thomas carpenter/cooper descendants. The records only indicate Thomas Jr., so far as I've seen, and Thomas, tailor's will doesn't give names of children.
Hi, I removed Susanna Ring as the mother. Thomas Clark had been removed as the father previously, and there doesn't seem to be any evidence that the couple had a son Thomas. If there's a source we can use to connect them, please add! Thank you!
I believe it is indicated in the Anderson version, that the Noyes, Libby, and Davis account was inaccurate in it's use of "sergeant" for the son of Thomas the carpenter. The determination that the sergeant was the tanner was based on the death of Rebecca Clark, wife of Thomas Jr. tanner. She was called "Rebecca Clark, widow of Sergeant Thomas" at her death.
I am doing some close examination on this family. I think that both sources I referenced above (which are both secondary) are correct and incorrect in various places, and I'm trying to sort that all out. Happy to talk more, but do think at any rate it would be appropriate for the use of "tailor" instead of "sergeant" to describe this profile.