no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Clarke Jr. (abt. 1638 - abt. 1682)

Sergeant Thomas Clarke Jr. aka Clark
Born about in Plymouth, Plymouth Colonymap [uncertain]
Husband of — married 1669 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 44 in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: D. Selinger private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Apr 2014
This page has been accessed 1,662 times.

Biography

Thomas was born in 1638, the son of Thomas and Grace Clarke.

Thomas was married to Abigail (Cogswell) Clark[citation needed]

Thomas and Abigail had the following children

Thomas was a tailor.

Thomas Clarke passed away in 1692.

Sources

  1. [1]: Thomas in entry for Thomas Clarke, 1664. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
  2. [2]: Thomas Clarke in entry for John Clarke, 1666. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
  3. [3]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Elizabeth Clarke, 20 Feb 1668; citing Birth, Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007010724. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch.
  4. [4]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Mary Clarke, 1669. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
  5. [5]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Georg Clarke, 1672. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.
  6. [6]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Nathaniell Clarke, 05 Nov 1674; citing Birth, Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007010724. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch.
  7. [7]: Thomas Clarke in entry for Samuell Clarke, 1677. "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch.




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Not sure if "Sergeant" is accurate for this profile. Anderson concludes: "...So this Thomas followed in his father's footsteps, being both tanner and sergeant" (Anderson, GMB Vol. 2 pg 96) The Thomas's indicated in the quote both tanners. This profile, for the Thomas Clark Jr to Thomas Clark the carpenter/cooper, was referred to as "tailor."

I believe it is indicated in the Anderson version, that the Noyes, Libby, and Davis account was inaccurate in it's use of "sergeant" for the son of Thomas the carpenter. The determination that the sergeant was the tanner was based on the death of Rebecca Clark, wife of Thomas Jr. tanner. She was called "Rebecca Clark, widow of Sergeant Thomas" at her death.

I am doing some close examination on this family. I think that both sources I referenced above (which are both secondary) are correct and incorrect in various places, and I'm trying to sort that all out. Happy to talk more, but do think at any rate it would be appropriate for the use of "tailor" instead of "sergeant" to describe this profile.

posted by Jared Stiffler
How do we know children Nathaniel and Samuel are not sons to Thomas Clark, Jr., tanner, instead of Thomas Clark, Jr., tailor? Anderson in his discussion of Thomas Jr., tanner, associates the names Nathaniel and Samuel with the Thomas tanner descendants as opposed to the Thomas carpenter/cooper descendants. The records only indicate Thomas Jr., so far as I've seen, and Thomas, tailor's will doesn't give names of children.
posted by Jared Stiffler
Unsupported parents removed to ensure they were not accidentally carried into the merge.
posted on Clark-74833 (merged) by Brad Stauf
Clark-19544 and Clarke-4319 appear to represent the same person because: Same Ipswich man. Same spouse
posted by Jillaine Smith
Jill, I'm detaching this Thomas from the father John because John died 15 years prior to Thomas' birth.
posted on Clark-19544 (merged) by Jillaine Smith
Hi, I removed Susanna Ring as the mother. Thomas Clark had been removed as the father previously, and there doesn't seem to be any evidence that the couple had a son Thomas. If there's a source we can use to connect them, please add! Thank you!
posted by M Cole
Clark-796 and Clark-19544 do not represent the same person because: NO MATCH
posted on Clark-19544 (merged) by Sally Stovall

C  >  Clarke  >  Thomas Clarke Jr.