Samuel Clark
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Samuel Clark (1661 - 1738)

Samuel Clark aka Clark
Born in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 6 Oct 1687 in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 76 in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Dec 2011
This page has been accessed 1,053 times.

Contents

Biography

Samuel Clark was born in 1661 and died about 1736

Samuel Clark died April 14, 1736.

NOTE

Sibling Elizabeth Clark McCall was born 84 years after the previous sibling, either her birth date is wrong or she belongs to another generation. More study needed.

Death and Burial

Buried in West Suffield Cemetery, Suffield, Hartford County, Connecticut, USA
Find A Grave Memorial# 127423512: [1]

Sources

Research Notes

"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7WZ-WLW : 3 December 2014), Joseph Clark in entry for Mary Clark, 30 Sep 1638; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.





Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Samuel's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Images: 1
Samuel Clark
Samuel Clark



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Clark-6837 and Clarke-2208 appear to represent the same person because: Two profiles, same person, it seems the Clark spelling is preferred, merge to that profile.
posted by Tom Bredehoft
apologies. I thought I had merged Clarke into Clark, which was my intent, since all of the attached profiles are simply Clark.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
: Warning: Check the dates.
A birth date should not be more than 60 years before or after a sibling's birth date.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Clarke-2208 and Clark-27739 appear to represent the same person because: same name, dates and family
posted by Patricia Roche
Clark-6837 and Clark-27739 are not ready to be merged because: Hello cousin, you need to work on some primary documentation a bit they do look similar but a little work on your end is needed. the book you listed while constituting a secondary and published genealogy is not substantiated by proofs.
Clark-3178 and Clark-27739 do not represent the same person because: Right off the bat they are different names altogether
Clark-3178 and Clark-27739 appear to represent the same person because: Hi there, cousins! I believe these two Clarks are the same person. I have been following the information in here and so far all the information matches up. Thanks! https://books.google.com/books?id=aVcBAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA38&lpg=PA38&dq=david+clark+rachel+moore&source=bl&ots=7fZ0PyCC4i&sig=rWOnjWcTo23Z11Hcf1qHIKyUx_A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQ-azrxIPMAhUM_mMKHfjeBmMQ6AEIMDAD#v=onepage&q=david%20clark%20rachel%20moore&f=false
posted by Rosie Blanckenburg
Clark-3178 and Clark-27739 appear to represent the same person because: Hi there, cousins! I believe these two Clarks are the same person. I have been following the information in here and so far all the information matches up. Thanks! https://books.google.com/books?id=aVcBAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA38&lpg=PA38&dq=david+clark+rachel+moore&source=bl&ots=7fZ0PyCC4i&sig=rWOnjWcTo23Z11Hcf1qHIKyUx_A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQ-azrxIPMAhUM_mMKHfjeBmMQ6AEIMDAD#v=onepage&q=david%20clark%20rachel%20moore&f=false
posted by Rosie Blanckenburg
Clark-6837 and Clark-27739 appear to represent the same person because: Hi there! These guys are the same I believe! This Samuel is the son Mary Newberry.
posted by Rosie Blanckenburg
Clark-24805 and Clark-6837 appear to represent the same person because: duplicate cleanup

C  >  Clark  >  Samuel Clark