no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Colby) Bagley (abt. 1635 - 1663)

Sarah Bagley formerly Colby
Born about in Amesbury, Essex, Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 6 Mar 1653 in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusettsmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 28 in Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Al Adams private message [send private message] and Franklin Colby private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 3 Jan 2011
This page has been accessed 2,522 times.

Contents

Biography

Sarah Colby was born about 1635, daughter of Anthony and Susanna (___) Colby. Her father came to Boston in New England about 1630, from Horbling, Lincolnshire, England, removing to Cambridge by 1632. He married the widow Susannah (___) Waterman of Boston by 1633. [1]

Her father Anthony's estate was divided by the Court on April 9, 1661 and daughter Sarah, wife of Orlando Bagley, received various livestock. (p. 408-11)[2]

Sarah married Orlando Bagley on March 6, 1653 at Salisbury Massachusetts Bay Colony. [1][3]

Sarah died at Boston on May 18, 1663.[4] (p. 5475)[5]

Children

John born ___; died August 31, 1658. [4] Orlando born February 18, 1658/9 [4]; married first Sarah Sargant, December 22, 1681 at Amesbury; married second Sarah Annes of Newbury, intentions published at Amesbury on March 25, 1704. [6] Sarah born Jan. 14, 1660/61: died September 30, 1661. [4] Mary born January 5, 1661/2. [4] Sarah born March 2, 1663 [4]; married John Mack, April 5, 1681 at Salisbury. [3]

Research Notes

Salisbury Marriages Coleby, Sarah, and Orlando Bagly, March 6, 1653. CTR (p. 268: p. 311) Bagly, Sarah, and John Mack, April 5, 1681. (p. 269)[3]

Boston Births 1658: Oulando of Oulando & Sarah Bagly born 18th February (p. 64) 1660: Sarah of Oulando & Sarah Bagley born January 14. (p. 73) 1661: Mary of Orlando & Sarah Bagly born January 5. (p. 78) 1663: Sarah of Orlando & Sarah Bagly born March 2. (p. 87)

Boston Deaths 1663: Sara wife of Orlando Bagly died the 18th of the 3d month. (p. 90) 1658: John of Orlando and Sara Bagly deceased August 31. (p. 66) 1661: Sarah of Orlando and Sarah Bagly deceased the 30th of September. (p. 81) [4]

Amesbury Marriages Bagly, Orlando, and Sarah Sargant, December 22, 1681. CTR (p. 273) Bagley, Orlando, sr., and Sarah Annes of Newbury, int. March 25, 1704. (p. 271)[6]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III, 3 Vols., NEHGS, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995 (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010)
  2. Essex County, Massachusetts: Early Probate Records, 1635-1681.Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Vital Records of Salisbury Massachusetts to the end of the year 1849, Topsfield Historical Society, Topsfield, Mass, 1915| Page 268
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Appleton, William S. Editor. City Document 130: Boston Births, Baptisms, Marriages and Deaths 1630-1699, Registry Dept. City of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, Rockwell & Churchill, 1883, (p. 5475)
  5. Inhabitants and Estates of the Town of Boston, 1630–1800 and The Crooked and Narrow Streets of Boston, 1630–1822. (Thwing Collection) (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2014.)
  6. 6.0 6.1 Vital Records of Amesbury Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849, Topsfield Historical Society, Topsfield, Massachsetts, 1913

See:





Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Colby-208 and Colby-120 do not represent the same person because: different
posted by Al Adams
Colby-206 and Colby-120 do not represent the same person because: different
posted by Al Adams
Colby-122 and Colby-120 do not represent the same person because: different
posted by Al Adams

C  >  Colby  |  B  >  Bagley  >  Sarah (Colby) Bagley