Baptized 24 March 1621/1622 in Olney, Buckinghamshire, England. (Pierson Millennium)
Both Lizzie Benedict Pierson (1878) and George Rogers Howell (1887), in their books, have stated that Henry Pierson married Mary Cooper and it has been repeated by many. However, it is not true. Both Mary Cooper, age 13 when she came to America on the Hopewell with her father John Cooper in 1635, and Henry Peirson have the same mother, Wyborough Griggs, as shown in the 1662 deed earlier. Therefore, Mary Cooper is Henry Peirson's half sister.
From the article by Thomas W. Cooper, II, in The American Genealogist, the sources of information for assuming Henry Peirson married Mary Cooper are examined and their true meaning shown. He concluded that Henry Peirson married a Mary, but not Mary Cooper.
To determine in what year the marriage took place, we will review the age of the oldest son Joseph:
"At a towne meeting (Southampton. Long Island) March 6, 1657/58 it was concluded that Joseph Pierson and Richard Howell (bap. 1629, now age 28) are to receive the hundred pounds for the town's use of the Indians."
Here, Joseph is mentioned for the first time in records and he is the oldest son of Henry Peirson (birth information for Joseph has not been located). If we assume that Joseph is at least 18 years of age in 1658 (reasonable for dealing with Indians and disbursing 100 pounds), then Joseph was born about 1640 in Lynn, Massachusetts or Southampton, Long Island. If this is so, then henry probably married about age 24 in 1639, probably at Olney, Buckinghamshire, England. Therefore, it is probable the Mary _____, Henry's wife, came to America with Henry Peirson in May 1639. Henry's wife Mary is probably the daughter of Edward Fuller of Olney, Buckinghamshire, England, whom Henry had hold a mortgage for him at Olney before departing in 1639 and to whom Henry sent a letter from Lynn, Massachusetts, in 1639 or 1640 about Edward Fuller's son, John.
At Olney, Buckinghamshire, England: "Mary Fuller Daughter) of Edward was bapt(ized) the xxiiijth of March 1621 (24 Mar 1621/2)." Baptisms were also recorded there for Mary's siblings Abygall, 31 May 1618; John, 20 Feb 1619/20; and Thomas (same date as Mary).
Will of "Edward Fuller of Olney, Bucks, yeoman, 22 Aug 1656, proved 20 Sep 1656. To my eldest son John Fuller my house, cottage or tenement in Olney, with the arable land &c. belonging, wherein I now dwell, next the cottage or tenement there now or late of Robert Martin on the one side. To my second son Ignacious Fuller my freehold lands, houses &c. in Olney and Sherrington Bucks. To my third son Thomas Fuller two hundred pounds, to be paid to him a year after my decease. To my daughter Abigail ten pounds, to be paid in a year &c. More to my eldest son John five pounds within a year. The residue to son Ignacious whom I make full and whole executor. Berkley, 334."
It was hoped that the Edward Fuller will would mention a Mary Pierson, but instead he does not mention her at all. It is concluded that Mary Fuller has already received her share of the estate through her dowry, perhaps as payment for the trip to America in 1639. Thus, Mary Fuller may have been the wife of Henry Peirson, but no proof exists. She is probably the Mary Peirson that was Henry's widow in 1680.
(Pierson Millennium)
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Mary is 11 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 16 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 8 degrees from George Catlin, 14 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 23 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 10 degrees from George Grinnell, 23 degrees from Anton Kröller, 11 degrees from Stephen Mather, 19 degrees from Kara McKean, 15 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 23 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
F > Fuller | F > Fletcher > Mary (Fuller) Fletcher
Categories: Olney, Buckinghamshire
While I have not completed that work, I have yet to see contemporaneous records showing his wife to be Mary Fuller.
From the current version of Henry's profile, "There is no proof that she was Mary Fuller, only coincidence of first name in the right place at the right time, and an unknown "relationship" between Edward Fuller and Henry Pierson."
The article by Thomas W. Cooper II is mentioned in her profile but not cited. See Thomas W. Cooper II, "The Cooper-Pierson-Griggs Connection: Long Island, Massachusetts, and Buckinghamshire, England." The American Genealogist, 64 (1993):193-202, in particular, p. 199; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors".
Citing "Southampton TR 5:192-93, 220, 271," Cooper writes, "Henry [Pierson], bp. ... 1615 .... m. Mary (---) (not the dau. of John Cooper); she m. (2) bet. 2 and 4 June 1681, the Rev. Seth Fletcher of Elizabeth, N.J."
So hoping those following the profile of Mary Fuller will assist by identifying any contemporaneous records showing Henry's wife, Mary, was otherwise Mary Fuller.
Thank you. --Gene
Edited to add: Just above the Fletcher-Pierson marriage contract is an odd item, "(Pierson Millennium)." What does that mean?
edited by GeneJ X
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Fuller-652
You wrote, "Pierson Millennium [1997] has dispelled this error. the children listed for Mary Cooper are indeed the children of Mary Fuller."
I suggest this association should be re-thought.
That Henry did not marry Mary Cooper was set out in 1989 by Thomas W. Cooper II, in The American Genealogist, 64:193-202, see digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors. Key to the work showing Mary Cooper was not Henry's wife was her father's 1662 will -- it did not mention his daughter Mary.
Just because Henry wasn't married to Mary Cooper does not mean he was married to Mary Fuller. As with the case of Mary Cooper, Edward Fuller's 1656 will does not mention his daughter, Mary, either.
I am not persuaded by the extending-the-record-statement (?apparently made by the 1997 authors), emphasis added,
Also, if I have understood the associations properly, the same work/authors, Pierson Millennium (1997), suggest this Mary Cooper was the mother of all Henry's children, including a number of undocumented children, the youngest of whom, Unknown Pierson, was born about 1673.' As she has been identified, Edward Fuller's daughter (baptized 1621) would have been at least age 52 in 1673. I take it the 1997 authors are silent on this point.
Finally, we have the 1662 deed, Peirson and Cooper to Fuller. Henry is identified therein "formerly of Olney .... sonne of William Peirson late of the same towne deceased and now of Southampton .... in New England." John Cooper [Jr] is described as "of the same towne of Southampton ... Brother of the said Henry Peirson by the Mother's side ..." The grantee, Ignatius Fuller, is not similarly identified as having any close relationship to Henry. If there was a close relationship between Henry and Ignatius, why was it not similarly set out in the deed?
What am I missing.--Gene
Thank you.