no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Fuller) Fletcher (1621 - 1687)

Mary Fletcher formerly Fuller aka Pierson
Born in Olney, Buckinghamshire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of and [mother unknown]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Wife of — married before 4 Jun 1681 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 66 in Southampton, Suffolk, New Yorkmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Doug Hanke private message [send private message] and Ron Pearson private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 25 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 1,427 times.

Biography

Cross of St George
Mary (Fuller) Fletcher was born in England.
Flag of England
Mary (Fuller) Fletcher migrated from England to United States.
Flag of United States


Baptized 24 March 1621/1622 in Olney, Buckinghamshire, England. (Pierson Millennium)

Both Lizzie Benedict Pierson (1878) and George Rogers Howell (1887), in their books, have stated that Henry Pierson married Mary Cooper and it has been repeated by many. However, it is not true. Both Mary Cooper, age 13 when she came to America on the Hopewell with her father John Cooper in 1635, and Henry Peirson have the same mother, Wyborough Griggs, as shown in the 1662 deed earlier. Therefore, Mary Cooper is Henry Peirson's half sister.

From the article by Thomas W. Cooper, II, in The American Genealogist, the sources of information for assuming Henry Peirson married Mary Cooper are examined and their true meaning shown. He concluded that Henry Peirson married a Mary, but not Mary Cooper.

To determine in what year the marriage took place, we will review the age of the oldest son Joseph:

"At a towne meeting (Southampton. Long Island) March 6, 1657/58 it was concluded that Joseph Pierson and Richard Howell (bap. 1629, now age 28) are to receive the hundred pounds for the town's use of the Indians."

Here, Joseph is mentioned for the first time in records and he is the oldest son of Henry Peirson (birth information for Joseph has not been located). If we assume that Joseph is at least 18 years of age in 1658 (reasonable for dealing with Indians and disbursing 100 pounds), then Joseph was born about 1640 in Lynn, Massachusetts or Southampton, Long Island. If this is so, then henry probably married about age 24 in 1639, probably at Olney, Buckinghamshire, England. Therefore, it is probable the Mary _____, Henry's wife, came to America with Henry Peirson in May 1639. Henry's wife Mary is probably the daughter of Edward Fuller of Olney, Buckinghamshire, England, whom Henry had hold a mortgage for him at Olney before departing in 1639 and to whom Henry sent a letter from Lynn, Massachusetts, in 1639 or 1640 about Edward Fuller's son, John.

At Olney, Buckinghamshire, England: "Mary Fuller Daughter) of Edward was bapt(ized) the xxiiijth of March 1621 (24 Mar 1621/2)." Baptisms were also recorded there for Mary's siblings Abygall, 31 May 1618; John, 20 Feb 1619/20; and Thomas (same date as Mary).

Will of "Edward Fuller of Olney, Bucks, yeoman, 22 Aug 1656, proved 20 Sep 1656. To my eldest son John Fuller my house, cottage or tenement in Olney, with the arable land &c. belonging, wherein I now dwell, next the cottage or tenement there now or late of Robert Martin on the one side. To my second son Ignacious Fuller my freehold lands, houses &c. in Olney and Sherrington Bucks. To my third son Thomas Fuller two hundred pounds, to be paid to him a year after my decease. To my daughter Abigail ten pounds, to be paid in a year &c. More to my eldest son John five pounds within a year. The residue to son Ignacious whom I make full and whole executor. Berkley, 334."

It was hoped that the Edward Fuller will would mention a Mary Pierson, but instead he does not mention her at all. It is concluded that Mary Fuller has already received her share of the estate through her dowry, perhaps as payment for the trip to America in 1639. Thus, Mary Fuller may have been the wife of Henry Peirson, but no proof exists. She is probably the Mary Peirson that was Henry's widow in 1680.

(Pierson Millennium)

Marriage Contract: Seth Fletcher and Mary Pearson [Peirson], 30 May 1681.[1]
This... A Covenant Contact and Agreement by and between Mr. Seth Fletcher of Elizabeth Town in the Province of New Jersey ... and Mrs. Mary Pearson of Southampton in the East riding of Yorkshire on Long Island ... Imps the said Mr Seth Fletcher ... doth hereby bind himself ...that he will not at any time vase of dispose or in the Least ever Concern himself or desire any of the Estate of ... Mrs Peirson. ... Onely 100 pounds which the said Mrs Peirson doth Engage to Deliver into his hands for the Mutual Comfort of each other ... and should it please God to call him out of this Life before the said Mrs Pearson to Leave unto her the said hundred pounds again and also to give unto her one hundred pounds more of his own proper Estate and to take three of her children with her as Long as she shall see cause to have them ... Mrs Mary Pearson doth hereby Engage herself ... if she shall depart ... before him ... ... that then he ... shall Quietly have and forever as his own proper and free Estate Enjoy the aforesaid One Hundred Pounds, without the Least demand of any by from or under her the said Mrs Peirson Clayming or Laying any manner of title or Claime ...

Sources

  1. Edwin Hatfield. History of Elizabeth, New Jersey (New York : Carlton & Lanahan, 1868), 208; digital images, Hathi Trust.
See also--
  • Richard E. Pierson and Jennifer Pierson, Pierson Millennium (Heritage Books, 1997); ISBN 0-7884-0742-2. (Note: WorldCat description opens, "Person millennium covers the approximate period 850 AD to 1850 AD, a thousand years though some data earlier than 850 and later than 1850 is presented...")
Other--
  • "Mary Fletcher," Geni World Family Tree
  • Clare Pierson. "Pierson McQuilkin Family Web Site" (family tree), My Heritage; My Heritage.




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Mary's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 11

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
As part of the PGM team, I am working to update the profile of Henry Pierson.

While I have not completed that work, I have yet to see contemporaneous records showing his wife to be Mary Fuller.

From the current version of Henry's profile, "There is no proof that she was Mary Fuller, only coincidence of first name in the right place at the right time, and an unknown "relationship" between Edward Fuller and Henry Pierson."

The article by Thomas W. Cooper II is mentioned in her profile but not cited. See Thomas W. Cooper II, "The Cooper-Pierson-Griggs Connection: Long Island, Massachusetts, and Buckinghamshire, England." The American Genealogist, 64 (1993):193-202, in particular, p. 199; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors".

Citing "Southampton TR 5:192-93, 220, 271," Cooper writes, "Henry [Pierson], bp. ... 1615 .... m. Mary (---) (not the dau. of John Cooper); she m. (2) bet. 2 and 4 June 1681, the Rev. Seth Fletcher of Elizabeth, N.J."

So hoping those following the profile of Mary Fuller will assist by identifying any contemporaneous records showing Henry's wife, Mary, was otherwise Mary Fuller.

Thank you. --Gene

Edited to add: Just above the Fletcher-Pierson marriage contract is an odd item, "(Pierson Millennium)." What does that mean?

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
When I was systematically investigating my DNA matches yesterday, I noticed that I have several matches with people who have ancestors named Fuller, many called Mary. In one case we both had Pierson and Fuller ancestry.
posted by Clare Pierson
Hi Mark, I completed the merge. Please correct this record as needed. What a mess!

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Fuller-652

posted by Kitty (Cooper) Smith
Cooper-2733 and Fuller-652 appear to represent the same person because: They are the same person. It's a longstanding error that Henry Peirson married Mary Cooper. Pierson Millennium has dispelled this error. the children listed for Mary Cooper are indeed the children of Mary Fuller. There are just some errors that need to be corrected. Please approve the merge and I will sort out the information.
posted by Mark Geesey
Hi Mark,

You wrote, "Pierson Millennium [1997] has dispelled this error. the children listed for Mary Cooper are indeed the children of Mary Fuller."

I suggest this association should be re-thought.

That Henry did not marry Mary Cooper was set out in 1989 by Thomas W. Cooper II, in The American Genealogist, 64:193-202, see digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors. Key to the work showing Mary Cooper was not Henry's wife was her father's 1662 will -- it did not mention his daughter Mary.

Just because Henry wasn't married to Mary Cooper does not mean he was married to Mary Fuller. As with the case of Mary Cooper, Edward Fuller's 1656 will does not mention his daughter, Mary, either.

I am not persuaded by the extending-the-record-statement (?apparently made by the 1997 authors), emphasis added,

It was hoped that the Edward Fuller will would mention a Mary Pierson, but instead he does not mention her at all. It is concluded that Mary Fuller has already received her share of the estate through her dowry, perhaps as payment for the trip to America in 1639. Thus, Mary Fuller may have been the wife of Henry Peirson, but no proof exists. She is probably the Mary Peirson that was Henry's widow in 1680.

Also, if I have understood the associations properly, the same work/authors, Pierson Millennium (1997), suggest this Mary Cooper was the mother of all Henry's children, including a number of undocumented children, the youngest of whom, Unknown Pierson, was born about 1673.' As she has been identified, Edward Fuller's daughter (baptized 1621) would have been at least age 52 in 1673. I take it the 1997 authors are silent on this point.

Finally, we have the 1662 deed, Peirson and Cooper to Fuller. Henry is identified therein "formerly of Olney .... sonne of William Peirson late of the same towne deceased and now of Southampton .... in New England." John Cooper [Jr] is described as "of the same towne of Southampton ... Brother of the said Henry Peirson by the Mother's side ..." The grantee, Ignatius Fuller, is not similarly identified as having any close relationship to Henry. If there was a close relationship between Henry and Ignatius, why was it not similarly set out in the deed?

What am I missing.--Gene

posted by GeneJ X
Fuller-652 and Cooper-2733 do not represent the same person because: I don't believe these are the same people because there are different children with different vital dates. However, I don't really know about this family.
posted by Kitty (Cooper) Smith
Cooper-8004 and Fuller-652 appear to represent the same person because: It's a long-standing error that Mary Cooper married Henry Pierson, Sr. of Southampton, New York. His bride was actually Mary Fuller. See biography for Fuller-652.
posted by Mark Geesey
Cooper-8004 and Cooper-2733 appear to represent the same person because: Enough vitals match to warrant a merge. The discrepancy in DOB likely was a misreading of a "double" date.
posted by Bob Nichol
Recent research has shown that her name at birth was Fuller, not Cooper. Mary Cooper married a different man. Please make the change or contact me for evidence.

Thank you.

posted by Mark Geesey
Cooper-2811 and Cooper-2733 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, similar details
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Fuller-2266 and Fuller-652 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, similar details
posted by Bob Tonsmeire

F  >  Fuller  |  F  >  Fletcher  >  Mary (Fuller) Fletcher

Categories: Olney, Buckinghamshire