no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Matheus (Cornelissen) Van Nieuwkerck (1647 - 1705)

Matheus Van Nieuwkerck formerly Cornelissen aka Cornelisse, van Nieuwkercke, Nieuwkirk
Born in Slichtenhorst, Gelderland, Nederlandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Brother of
Husband of — married 14 Dec 1670 in New Jerseymap
Husband of — married 5 Jul 1686 in Bergen County, New Jerseymap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 58 in Bergen, Province of New Jerseymap
Profile last modified | Created 10 Feb 2017
This page has been accessed 1,687 times.
The Prince's Flag.
Matheus (Cornelissen) Van Nieuwkerck was a New Netherland settler.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Gerrit Cornelissen, born 24th Juli 1631 in the town of Putten (very close to Nijkerk), whose parents were Cornelis Killen and Bijtie Gerrits, who were married in 1630. They had three children, born resp. in 1631, 1633 and 1634. None was called Mattheus. Seeing that the "boy" on the Moesman was about 12 he would have been born around 1647. Gerrit married Aeltie (Aeltjen) Gerrits in Putten on the 2nd December 1655. In the register of the Dutch Reformed Church it states clearly that Gerrit is the son of Cornelis Killen en Aeltjen the daughter of Gerrit Janssen. Gerrit Cornelissen and his wife moved to Nijkerk and only had the one child Disje, born on the 11th July 1658[1] The whole family then disappears from view. It could therefore well be that this is the Gerrit mentioned on the passenger list of the Moesman with wife and suckling child. It could also be that Gerrit and his family simply moved away to another town. Gerrit turns up in America married to Chieltje Slecht (Sleght).....[2]
The passenger list [3] of the Moesman, 25 April, 1659, contained the entry: "Gerrit Corn. van Niew-Kerk, and Wife and boy and sucking child. The boy was his brother Mattheus, aged about twelve years in 1659. Gerrit Cornelisse, probably from Nykerk, a town in Gelderland, or Nieuwerkerk, a town in Zeeland[4]
Mattheus stated that he came from Slichtenhorst which is a hamlet near Nijkerk it must have been the town of Nijkerk in Gelderland.[5]Mattheus left with his brother to the new Netherland, Mattheus was abt. 12 years of age in 1659, making his birth abt 1647

Birth

Mattheus was born in 1600.
Born 1600 in Slichtenhorst, Nijkerk, Gelderland, Netherlands
Matheuse was born after 1600. [6]
Matheus was born in 1686. Matheus Cornelison ... He passed away in 1705. [7]
August 15, 1686 Slichtenhorst (source ?) his wife was born abt 1655 so this would be a huge difference of age ...also they had a son baptized or born 1696, so the 1686 date of Birth is very unlikely (he would have been a father 10 years of age)

Church Records

1692 May 17 Jannetje; Matheus Cornelisen, Catreyna Paulus; sponsors: Marten Pouluse ym, Gerritje Gerrits widow of Barent Vochst? [8]

Death

12 May 1705 in Bergen, New Jersey
He passed away about 1642.
Died 1659 in , Netherlands

Sources

  1. Source: Archieven.nl Baptism Disje Gerrits 1658 Nijkerk scan pg 10 first entry left page
  2. From source : Rootsweb thread, this man has been sorting this family and has added what he found here
  3. O'Callahan, Documentary History of New York, iii, 35.
  4. Holmes genealogy Gerrit Cornelissen van Nieuwkerck
  5. See Source 1
  6. Entered by Don Schultze, Oct 7, 2011
  7. First-hand information as remembered by Dana Jones, Sunday, January 12, 2014.
  8. Bergen, New Jersey Church Records indexed at: http://www.ancestralcurios.com/cgi-bin/ASearch.cgi

Acknowledgments

  • This person was created through the import of LaBach Family TreeApril28_2011.ged on 05 May 2011.
  • This person was created on 20 March 2010 through the import of Finney Family Tree.ged
  • Nieuwkercke-2 was created by Paul Bailey through the import of Bailey Family Tree.ged on Dec 14, 2014.
  • Newkirk-170 was created by James VanDerMark through the import of VanDerMarkJamesDavid.ged on Apr 27, 2014.
  • Van Nieuwkirk-9 was created by James VanDerMark through the import of VanDerMarkJamesDavid.ged on Apr 27, 2014.
  • WikiTree profile Nieuwkirk-10 created through the import of BANDFIELD-NORDMAN.ged on Apr 30, 2012 by Charmayne Bischel.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Matheus by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 11

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I have the Baptism record of Newkirk-116 who is JACOMYNTJE MATHEUSE VAN NIEUKIRK. It is from New Jersey, Births and Christenings Index, 1660-1931and U.S., Dutch Reformed Church Records in Selected States, 1639-1989 Holland Society of New York; New York, New York; Bergen, New Jersey, Book 59 This shows that her father is Cornelissen-211 who is Matheus Van Nieuwkerck formerly Cornelissen aka Cornelisse, van Nieuwkercke, Nieuwkirk and her mother is her mother is Anna Lubi.

Could you add he Newkirk to Cornelissen-211 and his wife Anna Lubi's children?

posted by Bocca Sue McKellar CPA
Hi,

Van Nieuwkirk-9 and Van Nieuwkerck-1 appear to represent the same person because: These are the same and can be merged , see posts added here :)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
I have set Van Nieuwkirk-9 and this one as unmerged match, they look the same but have different wifes, so need some sources to determine weather he married twice or if maybe these are different people from a different generation ? One duplicate had a Birthdate of 1686, so it's possible this was a son of the abt 1647 one maybe ?

See post below, they seem to be duplicates so I think they can be merged , maybe someone has sources for them , like marriage or baptism records or transcripts , which could help make it more clear ?

All help is appreciated :)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
Removed Elbertgen Woltersand as his mother and Aerdt Kil Hermanson Cornelison as his father, no idea where they are coming from , but will try if I can find something now (again ;) )

Ok found this genealogy it explains the Elbertgen Woltersand and Aerdt Kil Hermanson Cornelison profiles ..they have :

Mattheus Cornelisse Van Nieuwkerk Sex: M Birth: ABT 1600 in Holland
Father: Aerdt "KIl Herman" Gerrits b: ABT 1575 in Arokemehen Mother: Elbertgen Woltersand
Marriage 1 Bijtie Gerrits b: in Putten, Holland, Netherland Married: 9 NOV 1630 in Putten, Gerlderland, Holland

And Children: 1. Gerret Cornelisse Van Nieuwkerk b: 1631 in Putten, Gelderland, Holland 2. Matteus" Cornelis Hermans" Van Nieuwkerk b: ABT 1642 in Putten, Gelderland, Holland

So for the patronymic, Gerrit Cornelisse was more likely a son of a Cornelis...so no idea why this Mattheus was added ??

But anyway, their Mattheus Corneliss Van Nieukirk (Van Nieuwkercke) has a Birthdate: December 4, 1642 Birthplace: Slichtenhorst, Nijkerk, Gelderland, Netherlands and Death: Died May 12, 1705 in Bergen, New Jersey And he is mentioned as Husband of:

  1. Catrina Nieuwkerck;
  2. Anna Lubi
  3. Catreyna Cornelison

So I guess the unmerged match can be removed and they can be merged ? (they are duplicates ?)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
I think this (also) is the Matheus (so a duplicate of the other Matheus brothers) who was mentioned as the brother of Gerrit , who travelled with them to the New Netherland , 12 years of age in 1659...mother Bijtje Gerrits was married to Cornelis Killen ..Patronymicly this would make more sense as well of course.

So I think we'd better correct this and add or search for a Cornelis Killen profile ...Kil is a common name in Gelderland (the van Rensselaer , van Renseler family has man names Kil or Killen, later derived : Killiaen (the first Killiaen actually was named 'Kille Jan') So the place Nijkerk seems very well possible as well

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
Newkirk-170 and Van Nieuwkerck-1 appear to represent the same person because: This is the same man, the oldest paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge. No tree conflicts. The wife is the same match, and the son Matheus is the same match, but with a 1686 birth date error that is too late. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Cornelison-149 and Van Nieuwkerck-1 appear to represent the same person because: This is the same man married to the same wife, but the son Mattheus born 1686 seems to be off by a couple generations, or a birth error. That can be adjusted later. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Van Nieuwkerck-1 and Van Nieukirk-1 appear to represent the same person because: The name on this match is probably reversed between the first name and the patronym. But it is the same man, the oldest common paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge. It should be merged into the previously established merged profile Van Niewkirk-1. Add aka Van Nieuwkerck. This has a marriage to keep, married November 9, 1630. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Nieuwkercke-2 and Van Nieukirk-1 appear to represent the same person because: This recently imported duplicate is the oldest paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge. No tree conflicts. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Vannieuwkirck-1 and Van Nieukirk-1 appear to represent the same person because: This is the oldest paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge. No tree conflicts. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
The LNAB here and the stated lineage backwards on this line are completely bogus.

It is possible that this Matheus was instead born as son of

http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Nieuwkirk-8

but that would be merely speculation based on a rationale for his being born with a Cornelison patronymic, which then became an adopted surname on this line for generations going forward.

But in any case it is impossible for this Matheus to be son of these attahced parents, Son of Mattheus Cornelison and Bijtie Gerrits.

And the usage of the Cornelison *surname* for the male lineage backwards from this Matheus is entirely fabricated.

There will need to be an entire re-sourcing of those ancestors to determine who they actually were.

posted by Steven Mix