no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elisha A Cox (1767 - 1845)

Elisha A Cox
Born in Rowan County, North Carolinamap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 15 Dec 1796 in Holly Springs, Carteret County, North Carolina, USAmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 78 in Randolph County, North Carolinamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Edie Kohutek private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 17 Nov 2013
This page has been accessed 915 times.

Contents

Biography

Elisha was born 14 Feb 1767. [1] He is the son of Samuel Cox and Hannah Wierman. [2]

Location of Birth

Randolph County, North Carolina was formed out of Rowan and Guilford Counties in 1779. [3]

Sources

  1. Guilford College; Greensboro, North Carolina; Records Births and Deaths, Vol 01, p. 35, 1746-1935; Collection: North Carolina Yearly Meeting Minutes. Title: Records Births and Deaths, Vol 01, 1746-1935. Source Information Ancestry.com. U.S., Quaker Meeting Records, 1681-1935 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. Original data: Southern Quarter, Holly Spring Monthly Meeting, Vol. I Record of Births and Deaths; URL https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&db=QuakerMeetMins&h=8912451
  2. Find A Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/165444502 : accessed 16 January 2018), memorial page for Elisha A Cox (14 Feb 1767–3 Nov 1845), Find A Grave Memorial no. 165444502, ; Maintained by Shary Mullins Simpson (contributor 47540806) Unknown.
  3. Wikipedia article

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Heather Stengel for creating Cox-5876 on 17 Nov 13.





Is Elisha your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elisha by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elisha:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Cox-20891 and Cox-5876 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same spouse
posted by N Gauthier
Cox-5876 and Cox-20891 do not represent the same person because: Cox-5876 does not have a child by the name of Mary Rebecca Polly Cox King. I believe Cox-20891 was created to give Mary Rebecca Polly a parent. There is no support for Elisha King and Mary Littler being the parents of Mary Rebecca Polly. Cox-20891 and Littler-260 need to be changed to the proper or more likely parents of Mary Rebecca Polly. She does not need to be attached to Cox-5876.
Cox-20891, Elisha Cox, has been created and attached to Cox-5928, Mary Rebecca Polly Cox King, along with Littler-260, Mary Littler, as the parents of Cox-5928. I do not see any support for Cox-5928, Mary Rebecca Polly Cox King, being the daughter of Elisha Cox and Mary Littler. See Findagrave Memorial-48041647 for discussion of parentage. So I am going to reject the merge of Cox-20891 and Cox-5876 because it would have the effect of adding a child to Elisha Cox who is not his child. If Mary Rebecca Polly Cox King is disengaged as the child of Cox-20891, then we can merge in order to get rid of the duplicate. Please excuse any typos; I am working on my tablet.
Cox-20891 and Cox-5876 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same spoouse
posted by N Gauthier

C  >  Cox  >  Elisha A Cox

Categories: Randolph County, North Carolina