no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Joseph Cox (abt. 1742 - 1790)

Joseph Cox aka Cock, Cocks
Born about in Mattincock, New Yorkmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1760 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Father of and
Died at about age 48 [location unknown]
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 21 Feb 2014
This page has been accessed 288 times.

Biography

Joseph was born in 1742. Joseph Cox ... He passed away in 1790.

This profile is a collaborative work-in-progress. Can you contribute information or sources?

Sources


See also:

  • History and genealogy of the Cock-Cocks-Cox family : descended from James and Sarah Cock of Killingworth upon Matinecock, in the township of Oysterbay, Long Island, New York / compiled by George William Cocks ; assisted by John Cox, Jr. New York : Priv. print., 1912: p. [1]-xii, 1-345 (2nd group), pp. 51-52. [1]





Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Joseph:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Cock-53 and Cox-6717 appear to represent the same person because: Undoubtedly the same person. The name Cox evolved from earlier forms - Cocks and Cock.
posted by Dave Rutherford
Is this Joseph Cock the same as Joseph Cox Nothing is comparable other than Rhoda Frost. I am not including this in my personal database as not enough to go on and I think it is one of those glitches from merging information. The name Cox and Cock is interchangeable so this may be part of the problem.

C  >  Cox  >  Joseph Cox