No biography yet.[1] Can you add information or sources?
Died Y.
1820
Warren, Kentucky, USA.
Age: 89-90.
Research Notes
Location: There is not enough information to determine whether Lunenburg County or Lunenburg Parish was intended. Lunenburg County did not exist in 1730. It was formed in 1746 from Brunswick County.[2] In 1732, Lunenburg Parish was formed "from North-Farnham, in Richmond Co", and served Richmond County "to aft 1785".[3] It seems likely that John Cox, born 1758 in Halifax County, is his son.[4] Halifax County was formed from Lunenburg County in 1752.[3]
Warning (received 22 April 2018):
Check the data.
A child's birth date (Cocke-392 born 1680) should not be before a parent is six years old (Cox-8324 born 1730) .
A child's death date (Cox-8325 died 3 Jul 1728) should not be before a parent is seven years old (Cox-8324 born 1730) .
A parent's death date (Cox-8324 died 1820) should not be more than 110 years after the birth of one of their children (Cocke-392 born 1680) . This would mean the parent lived to be well over 110.
Sources
↑ Cox-8324 was created by Paul Linden through the import of Anna May Hammer Family Tree 062814.ged on Jun 30, 2014. This comment and citation should be deleted after a short biography has been added and primary sources have been cited.
↑ Daughters of the American Revolution, DAR Genealogical Research Databases, database online, (http://www.dar.org/ : accessed 22 April 2018), "Record of John Cox", Ancestor # A027043.
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
I believe this may be the father of John Cox b 1758 in Halifax County (based partly on John b 1758 having a child named Coleman).
See Daughters of the American Revolution, DAR Genealogical Research Databases, database online, (http://www.dar.org/ : accessed 22 April 2018), "Record of John Cox", Ancestor # A027043.
<s>Also, based on that John's DAR record, I believe the location for this John's birth was intended to be Lunenburg Parish, not County.</s> I'll add a research note about that
update - added research note, but also changed my mind about Parish being correct. There's just not enough info for me to figure out what was intended.
See Daughters of the American Revolution, DAR Genealogical Research Databases, database online, (http://www.dar.org/ : accessed 22 April 2018), "Record of John Cox", Ancestor # A027043.
<s>Also, based on that John's DAR record, I believe the location for this John's birth was intended to be Lunenburg Parish, not County.</s> I'll add a research note about that
update - added research note, but also changed my mind about Parish being correct. There's just not enough info for me to figure out what was intended.