no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Crandall) Button (abt. 1654 - bef. 1695)

Sarah Button formerly Crandall aka Witter
Born about in Newport, Newport, Rhode Islandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1676 (to 26 Nov 1685) in Salem, Essex, Massachusettsmap
Wife of — married about 1686 (to before 1695) in Stonington, New London, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 41 in Stonington, Stonington, New London, Connecticut, British Colonial Americamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Alan Peet private message [send private message] and Todd Gross private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 7 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 2,402 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Contents

Biography

English flag
Sarah (Crandall) Button has English ancestors.

Sarah Crandall, daughter of Elder John Crandall and his first wife, married first before 1677, as his 2nd wife, Josiah Witter, son of William and Hannah Witter, formerly of Lynn, Massachusetts. She married second to Peter Button, son of Mathias and Teagle Button. Peter remarried in about 1695 to Mary Lanphear.[1]


Death

Sarah's second husband, Peter Button, remarried in 1696, and he and his new wife had their first child in 1697, therefore Sarah must have been dead by 1696.

Marriage

Husband: Josiah Witter
Wife: Sarah Crandall
Marriage:
Date: 1676
Place: Stonington, New London, Connecticut Colony
Husband: Peter Button[2]

Sources

  1. Gifford, Paul M., "The Probable Origins and Ancestry of John Crandall, of Westerly, Rhode Island (1618-1676)," published in Rhode Island Roots, vol. 32, no. 4, Dec 2006, pages 165-186. Online database of NEHGS - AmericanAncestors.org: John Crandall of Rhode Island pages 182-185.
  2. Torrey, Clarence Almon. New England marriages prior to 1700, New England Historic Genealogical Society, Film #929494, image 940 of 1964, FamilySearch. [1]

See also:





Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Crandall-2790 and Crandall-129 appear to represent the same person because: see profile of Crandall-129.
Crandall-895 and Crandall-129 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, similar dates, no conflicting relationship
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Death date needs confirmation.
posted by Vic Watt

C  >  Crandall  |  B  >  Button  >  Sarah (Crandall) Button

Categories: Stonington, Connecticut One Place Study | Stonington, Connecticut | Estimated Birth Date