This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.
Biography
Matilda Bridget Crawford was born possibly about 1710 in Ireland. She possibly married John N. Braselton, Sr. on Abt. 1732 in Baltimore, Maryland. [citation needed]
This profile is unsourced with a lot of "creative suggestions" provided by contributors.
Research Notes
Probably died between 1763 and 1788 as she signed a deed in 1763 and she was not mentioned in her husband's will dated 1788.[citation needed]
Possible children of Matilda Bridget Crawford and John N. Braselton, Sr. are:
Issac Brazelton, b. 1740, Frederick County, Maryland, d. 1812, Washington County, Kentucky.
John N. Brazelton, Jr., b. April 13, 1741, Little Pipe Creek, Prince Georges County, Maryland1365, d. March 14, 1781, Springfield, Guilford County, North Carolina1365.
Ann Brazelton, b. 1744, Little Pipe Creek, Frederick County, Maryland1366, d. 1824, Harrison County, Ohio1366.
Ester Brazelton, b. July 24, 1748, Frederick, Maryland.
Jacob Braselton, Sr., b. June 27, 1749, Little Pipe Creek, Frederick County, Maryland1366, d. September 22, 1835, Jackson County, Georgia1366.
Is Mary your relative? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
Crawford-11839 and Crawford-5828 are not ready to be merged because: These profiles are not ready to be merged. Sources are needed, not even sure if the relationships are accurated.
Crawford-11839 and Crawford-5828 appear to represent the same person because: Same relationships, dates, etc. Similar names/use of nickname. (This "Bridget" nickname paired with names that don't naturally lead to that is going to have to be worked out at some point - maybe there were two wives or something? But is common across many ancestry platforms. See also: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/L14Q-87M ). But either way these two profiles represent the same woman.
edited by Russell Butler